Slashdot Mirror


User: cylock

cylock's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
6
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 6

  1. and nothing about security algorithms? on Top Ten Algorithms of the Century · · Score: 2

    And why would you leave out Diffie-Hellman
    asymmetrical key encryption algorithms?
    Any hope you have of privacy now or in the
    near future is going to be based on this.

  2. Re:grad school... on Ask Slashdot: Comp-Sci Graduate Schools · · Score: 1

    And obviously I don't deserve it based on
    grammar and memory...
    I meant to say "from THE University of
    Southern California." ;-)

  3. grad school... on Ask Slashdot: Comp-Sci Graduate Schools · · Score: 2

    My Ph.D. is from University of Southern Carolina.
    But if you are planning on a Ph.D. (Most of the
    top schools will actually pay you to geta Ph.D.
    getting funding at the masters level is usually
    improbably or impossible.) My advice would be
    that your selection of advisor is as, or more,
    important than your selection of school.
    You can go to the best school with the fanciest
    labs but if the professor in charge of the
    lab isn't your advisor chances are you aren't
    ever going to see that lab except for maybe
    course work.

    Your advisor also determines the topics of
    research that you work on. You'll start by
    doing work related to their interest, not yours
    (Its what you get paid for.) This will ultimately
    lead to your Dissertation topic.

    So the advisor has an extreme amount of inffluence
    on what you have access to and what your topics
    will be.

    I would also suggest trying to pick an advisor
    that already has tenure. I didn't and my
    advisor picked up in the middle of my dissertation
    and switched schools leaving me without a lot of
    fundamental support. And the school didn't have
    any protocol for what to do with a fifth year
    grad. student with a thesis topic and no advisor
    so I felt I was left out to dry. I think a
    professor with tenure and a well established lab
    is less likely to leave you hanging.

    my $0.02

  4. Re:IPO = Important People Only [n/t] on "The Word" from E*Trade About the RH IPO · · Score: 1

    I didn't get any. How about anybody else?
    I also had to jump through a dozen hoops to
    get in.
    Hey E*Trade!!!... Watch my account tomorrow!
    You can kiss a five significant figure account
    bye bye.
    I've got three other online brokerages, *ALL*
    of which have a better site, more useful info
    and treat me better.

  5. Even if you were in apparently you aren't... on "The Word" from E*Trade About the RH IPO · · Score: 1

    I'm an affinity invitee. I didn't get any eMail but I got the phone call at 9:00am. I sent the eMail as directed to. I even called a broker and changed the number of shares I was interested in (to match my available funds.)

    But checking my account I see that I didn't get
    a single damn share.

    E*Trade can watch about $50K leave their brokerage tomorrow. I've had such a horrible experience dealing with my first IPO (even when invited!) that I can't think of a single reason to have an account with them at all.

  6. Ineligibility stuff... on Barred from Red Hat IPO? · · Score: 1

    I'm sure somebody has mentioned this:
    The "Oracle" is not E*Trade (nor RedHat).
    It has something to do with SEC/NASD or so
    I've been told.

    I think what E*Trade did screw up was in not
    providing clearly definitions for the questions.

    In particular such questions like:
    "What do you feel your overall expertise at
    trading is?" Excellent? Good? Fair? Poor?
    That is highly suggestive. Compared to just
    about everybody else where I work I'm a genius
    at investing. But compared to Tom and Dave
    Gardner, Alan Greenspan or Peter Lynch I pretty
    much suck.

    E*Trade should have a *very* easy to find,
    must-read FAQ on exactly what the questions
    mean. As in definitions for what "Good
    experience" is.

    And for those out I would recommend placing
    your indication of interest directly through
    a human broker at E*Trade. I did and he
    cleared up several points such as that.

    For one: "What is the amount of liquid assets
    you own?" Silly me: I thought "liquid" meant
    "cash" or anything that you can directly write
    a check against without incurring debt. Well
    I've I'ld have answered that I'ld have killed
    myself. I don't keep more than a couple
    thousand in such accounts (checking mostly).
    But what "liquid" really means is: "Cash or
    *anything* that can quickly and easily be
    converted to cash." This includes any mutual
    funds you may have, stock securities, checking,
    savings... Basically it turns out to be my
    entire portfolio minus my house, automobiles
    and IRA/401Ks.

    If you don't have a large amount of liquid
    worth then the SEC will mark you ineligible
    because you cannot afford the high risk of
    IPOs. If it were to go very badly for you it
    would wipe out just about everything you own
    except the roof over your head.

    I know it sucks, I really do. I learned these
    lessons the hard way before. I encourage anybody
    who went through this to write a simple letter
    to E*Trade asking them to make available much
    clearer documentation on the IPO process and
    questions.