Dr. Robert Park has some fair commentary on the matter of "bogus science", however, his perspective causes him to categorically reject (without inquiry) that which he does not understand or have laws with which to explain. That he thinks that we humans in the year 2003 should have scientific laws to explain everything that exists, or else it "doesn't" exist, makes me laugh. I'm sure a few hundred years ago he would have insisted that the earth was flat. Take a look at an intelligent viewpoint of the scientific process, Dr. Edmund Storms
Dr. Robert Park has some fair commentary on the matter of "bogus science", however, his perspective causes him to categorically reject (without inquiry) that which he does not understand or have laws with which to explain. That he thinks that we humans in the year 2003 should have scientific laws to explain everything that exists, or else it "doesn't" exist, makes me laugh. I'm sure a few hundred years ago he would have insisted that the earth was flat. Take a look at an intelligent viewpoint of the scientific process, Dr. Edmund Storms