the problem is end to end transparency. and also the fact that IPsec and other protocols need cant really work behind a natted system.
for complete utilization of a network protocol (capabilities that it has to offer) natted system acts as a hinderance.
i personally believe natted only helps in the short run.
This is wierd.
So now the hacker will set his evil bit to 1 because he is evil? and who will make sure he dont send it as 0.
The only use I see of this is to distinguish to a server in a autonomous system that the packet originated internally or its an external packet. So the server can make distinction based on the bit to its behaviour.
Is that what this bit is intended for??
the problem is end to end transparency. and also the fact that IPsec and other protocols need cant really work behind a natted system. for complete utilization of a network protocol (capabilities that it has to offer) natted system acts as a hinderance. i personally believe natted only helps in the short run.
This is wierd. So now the hacker will set his evil bit to 1 because he is evil? and who will make sure he dont send it as 0. The only use I see of this is to distinguish to a server in a autonomous system that the packet originated internally or its an external packet. So the server can make distinction based on the bit to its behaviour. Is that what this bit is intended for??
Just heard on ABC news, the price of war as of now is already 1.1 Trillion $$.. that is a big figure I think..