Wait! Hold on, back up. HTML is XML, so it obviously is working for the majority of data transfers. Secondly, why would anyone give direct access to a DB? The slow connections of a DB are not suitable for presenting data to the public. I am sure many of the Web Services, extract the data, then cache it, or write it to disk, then present the same data to the world.
Sure a better solution to XML may exist, but it is not reading directly from a DB. For now, Vive Le XML.
Although they deem it ok to do business with illegal gambling, they do not deem it okay to do business with anti-war sites.
I boycotted Paypal since I found out they are not supporting anti-war sites. Also, their affiliated company, eBay will release your buying habits and information to the gov't without a subpeona or telling you. I stay away from them also.
Until they are considered a public service, Google has the right to censor as a private company, just as Disney does. The question we should be asking is, "Is google producing relevant searches and if not, what are our alternatives?"
Obama's greatness is yet to come. Judge him in four years.
Many textbooks can cost upwards or exceed $100.
Wait! Hold on, back up. HTML is XML, so it obviously is working for the majority of data transfers. Secondly, why would anyone give direct access to a DB? The slow connections of a DB are not suitable for presenting data to the public. I am sure many of the Web Services, extract the data, then cache it, or write it to disk, then present the same data to the world. Sure a better solution to XML may exist, but it is not reading directly from a DB. For now, Vive Le XML.
Although they deem it ok to do business with illegal gambling, they do not deem it okay to do business with anti-war sites.
I boycotted Paypal since I found out they are not supporting anti-war sites. Also, their affiliated company, eBay will release your buying habits and information to the gov't without a subpeona or telling you. I stay away from them also.
Until they are considered a public service, Google has the right to censor as a private company, just as Disney does. The question we should be asking is, "Is google producing relevant searches and if not, what are our alternatives?"
try http://www.epitonic.com