You are making conclusive statements ex post facto. As such, you are looking at the facts in a neatly arranged time line and making cause and effect conclusions with the biased benefit of hindsight.
The very popular and academically acclaimed British historian Niall Fergusson wrote following about the time period starting 33 years prior to WWI: "In particular, I ask why the outbreak of the First World War, an event traditionally seen as having been heralded by a series of international crises, was not apparently anticipated by investors."
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1468-0289.2005.00335.x/abstract
And as a counterpoint, which supports what fnj said: How often do you have superpowers build up their arsenal and "rattle their swords" but nothing happens. According to you North Korea should have started a nuclear war a long time ago.
Pfft.
If you look at the country and its civilization as an evolving system you would find that early on (during the early settlement period)
it was a very rudimentary system with very poor or non-existing infrastructure.
At that time, creating anything to satisfy immediate needs produced immediate results and great benefit. Examples: roads & highways, sewer systems, water treatment systems, power plants, railroads, ships, mass manufacturing & automation of heavy and laborious tasks.
At the current point in time, the system has become very efficient with its infrastructure, automation, and highly evolved sophisticated communication systems. The challenge at this stage is recognizing when it's more beneficial (think cost & creation of new opportunities) to throw away existing work done and create something completely new to replace it or merely maintain and incrementally improve the existing work. A very intensive multi-dimensional cost-benefit analysis would be required for the former.
Aside from that, the current system also represents an evolved complexity which poses another challenge, namely whether to attempt to integrate into the existing complexity or seek to reduce it with the new work done.
In some ways, this is similar to software development. =)
Apparently, Arben Kryeziu is really no deveoper of any kind.
As people already suspected, he stole the PearPC code for CherryOS, he most likely stole Java code for his VX streamer (see posts above). And now I have reason to suspect that he also did not develop the bumpnetworks.com website.
He posted an outsourcing bid for one of his web site developments (bumpnetworks.com?). Search on that page for the string "Hello Arben Kryeziu" and "Hello Bumpnetworks" to confirm this.
Now scroll to the winner's bid (will say "AWARDED" on the left). His location Donetsk, UA (Ukraine -> Russia). Now, go to bumpnetworks.com and follow the menu: "Company -> Partnerships." You will discover Site-Mechanics to be a partner. Go there and visit their clientele references. You will notice that most of the clients and work done was in Russia(n). Could it be that that guy developed bumpnetworks.com (and many other)?
That leaves us with the original question: what did he really develop or did he "outsource and share code" (LOL) for everything. He seems to be good at talking the language of "the suits" and seems to be better at being a manager than doing the actual work.
Well here is the answer, which is also my GRAND FINALE!!!
if you visit his Elance Feedback profile and scroll all the way to the end you will notice TWO bids he put up:
#1 "Web Programming
pdf to html conversion
Beaux
US$1,500.00"
AND...
#2 "Application Development
PowerPC Emulator
comsdev
US$2,700.00"
If you visit both bids (bid 1 and bid 2 you will notice that he actually paid OTHER teams at Elance.com to do the dirty work for him.
I have very strong reason to suspect that
he never wrote ANY part of any code of any kind! Instead, the people that actually STOLE the code from PearPC and PDF2HTML (read to verify) are the actual perpetrators!!!
How come nobody else established this connection?!
Slashdot Mirror
Utter nonsense boy.
You are making conclusive statements ex post facto. As such, you are looking at the facts in a neatly arranged time line and making cause and effect conclusions with the biased benefit of hindsight.
The very popular and academically acclaimed British historian Niall Fergusson wrote following about the time period starting 33 years prior to WWI: "In particular, I ask why the outbreak of the First World War, an event traditionally seen as having been heralded by a series of international crises, was not apparently anticipated by investors."
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1468-0289.2005.00335.x/abstract
And as a counterpoint, which supports what fnj said: How often do you have superpowers build up their arsenal and "rattle their swords" but nothing happens. According to you North Korea should have started a nuclear war a long time ago.
Pfft.
If you look at the country and its civilization as an evolving system you would find that early on (during the early settlement period) it was a very rudimentary system with very poor or non-existing infrastructure. At that time, creating anything to satisfy immediate needs produced immediate results and great benefit. Examples: roads & highways, sewer systems, water treatment systems, power plants, railroads, ships, mass manufacturing & automation of heavy and laborious tasks. At the current point in time, the system has become very efficient with its infrastructure, automation, and highly evolved sophisticated communication systems. The challenge at this stage is recognizing when it's more beneficial (think cost & creation of new opportunities) to throw away existing work done and create something completely new to replace it or merely maintain and incrementally improve the existing work. A very intensive multi-dimensional cost-benefit analysis would be required for the former. Aside from that, the current system also represents an evolved complexity which poses another challenge, namely whether to attempt to integrate into the existing complexity or seek to reduce it with the new work done. In some ways, this is similar to software development. =)
Here's a qualifying domestic contender http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/car/11q2/2012_chevrolet_sonic-first_drive_review
Arben Girlfriend's Private web site w/ photos!!!.
Be sure to check out Mr.Goofy with his new Porsche
What's really SAD is the fact that he could not even do his girflriend's site himself. He gave that "project" to others
W.
Apparently, Arben Kryeziu is really no deveoper of any kind.
As people already suspected, he stole the PearPC code for CherryOS, he most likely stole Java code for his VX streamer (see posts above). And now I have reason to suspect that he also did not develop the bumpnetworks.com website.
He posted an outsourcing bid for one of his web site developments (bumpnetworks.com?). Search on that page for the string "Hello Arben Kryeziu" and "Hello Bumpnetworks" to confirm this. Now scroll to the winner's bid (will say "AWARDED" on the left). His location Donetsk, UA (Ukraine -> Russia). Now, go to bumpnetworks.com and follow the menu: "Company -> Partnerships." You will discover Site-Mechanics to be a partner. Go there and visit their clientele references. You will notice that most of the clients and work done was in Russia(n). Could it be that that guy developed bumpnetworks.com (and many other)?
That leaves us with the original question: what did he really develop or did he "outsource and share code" (LOL) for everything. He seems to be good at talking the language of "the suits" and seems to be better at being a manager than doing the actual work.
Well here is the answer, which is also my GRAND FINALE!!!
if you visit his Elance Feedback profile and scroll all the way to the end you will notice TWO bids he put up:
#1 "Web Programming pdf to html conversion Beaux US$1,500.00"
AND...
#2 "Application Development PowerPC Emulator comsdev US$2,700.00"
If you visit both bids (bid 1 and bid 2 you will notice that he actually paid OTHER teams at Elance.com to do the dirty work for him.
I have very strong reason to suspect that he never wrote ANY part of any code of any kind! Instead, the people that actually STOLE the code from PearPC and PDF2HTML (read to verify) are the actual perpetrators!!!
How come nobody else established this connection?!
W.