The installation program worked fine for me under WINE. The IDE ran as well, but I ran into some problems when trying to compile simple C projects (both from the IDE and command line). My experience with the Watcom IDE and compilers are fairly limited, so it may well be my fault that it wouldn't work.
Has there been any word about how difficult it would be to add support for such features to GCJ? Any word regarding how long it'd take for such support to be added?
It should also be noted that there is an addendum to the LGPL licence covering FOX that clarifies several issues. Unmodified versions of the FOX library can be statically linked to applications without causing licensing headaches, however, any changes to the library must be made available.
This may be attractive to developers who wish to simplify the distribution of their software by statically linking in FOX, but without putting their work under the LGPL as well.
Is there any word about the inclusion of Objective-C++ support for GCC within the near future? Would this new parser allow for the easier or quicker inclusion of Objective-C++ support?
While considered ugly by some, Objective-C++ would allow for the easier creation of Objective-C bindings for C++ libraries under platforms supporting the GCC Objective-C compiler. I would sure look forward to Objective-C bindings to libraries such as wxWindows and FOX.
Slashdot Mirror
The installation program worked fine for me under WINE. The IDE ran as well, but I ran into some problems when trying to compile simple C projects (both from the IDE and command line). My experience with the Watcom IDE and compilers are fairly limited, so it may well be my fault that it wouldn't work.
Has there been any word about how difficult it would be to add support for such features to GCJ? Any word regarding how long it'd take for such support to be added?
It should also be noted that there is an addendum to the LGPL licence covering FOX that clarifies several issues. Unmodified versions of the FOX library can be statically linked to applications without causing licensing headaches, however, any changes to the library must be made available.
This may be attractive to developers who wish to simplify the distribution of their software by statically linking in FOX, but without putting their work under the LGPL as well.
It's also good to see newer scripting languages like Ferite progressing as well.
Is there any word about the inclusion of Objective-C++ support for GCC within the near future? Would this new parser allow for the easier or quicker inclusion of Objective-C++ support?
While considered ugly by some, Objective-C++ would allow for the easier creation of Objective-C bindings for C++ libraries under platforms supporting the GCC Objective-C compiler. I would sure look forward to Objective-C bindings to libraries such as wxWindows and FOX.