Actually, I have been using IPv6 on my computer for awhile, and I got my/48 block from freenet6, and will do that too, but I still need something for IPv4. And besides, IPv4 numbers are easier to remember than IPv6
Do you think girls with all that make up caked on their face is pretty? I don't. I think the uncovered human face is beauty in itself.
So why should I clutter up a pretty 10. address with all that 192.168 makeup.
Are we ready for 64-bit on the desktop? yes. Do we need it? No, but that isn't the point of a lot of computer hobbyists. Most of us don't really need the latest video card from ATi or nVidia. Mose of us don't need the latest processor from AMD or Intel. But we still buy the latest and the greatest. Why? Could be a matter of manhood, or for the woman, womanhood. Whatever reason it is for this phenomenon, there is no doubt that it happens.
Yes, we are ready, and no, we don't need it, but the hobbyist will still buy them if the average computer consumer won't.
In my experience with many GUI toolkits. There just isn't any one that works well accross all platforms. Those that come close are just lacking of features.
If you have the time and knowledge, the best thing is to use each OS's standard toolkit. Whether it be MFC, QT/GTK, Cocoa/Carbon, or whatever, if you want it to look good and feel good, you can't really have cross platform.
Despite this, I do not discourage using cross-platform toolkits. On appliactions that the GUI isn't really that important, or it is placed elsewhere (OpenGL, etc), cross-platform toolkits work great.
Slashdot Mirror
Actually, I have been using IPv6 on my computer for awhile, and I got my /48 block from freenet6, and will do that too, but I still need something for IPv4. And besides, IPv4 numbers are easier to remember than IPv6
Do you think girls with all that make up caked on their face is pretty? I don't. I think the uncovered human face is beauty in itself. So why should I clutter up a pretty 10. address with all that 192.168 makeup.
Are we ready for 64-bit on the desktop? yes. Do we need it? No, but that isn't the point of a lot of computer hobbyists. Most of us don't really need the latest video card from ATi or nVidia. Mose of us don't need the latest processor from AMD or Intel. But we still buy the latest and the greatest. Why? Could be a matter of manhood, or for the woman, womanhood. Whatever reason it is for this phenomenon, there is no doubt that it happens. Yes, we are ready, and no, we don't need it, but the hobbyist will still buy them if the average computer consumer won't.
In my experience with many GUI toolkits. There just isn't any one that works well accross all platforms. Those that come close are just lacking of features.
If you have the time and knowledge, the best thing is to use each OS's standard toolkit. Whether it be MFC, QT/GTK, Cocoa/Carbon, or whatever, if you want it to look good and feel good, you can't really have cross platform.
Despite this, I do not discourage using cross-platform toolkits. On appliactions that the GUI isn't really that important, or it is placed elsewhere (OpenGL, etc), cross-platform toolkits work great.
Just my 2 cents