Slashdot Mirror


User: Uberbah

Uberbah's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
9,862
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 9,862

  1. Re:There is no reason for any drought to continue on How California Is Winning the Drought · · Score: 1

    The real problem is that California's population has grown by about 30% in the past 20 years, and the water system hasn't kept up.

    Er, no. Residential use is barely over 10% of the state's water consumption, and much of that goes into swimming pools and golf courses for the 1%. 80% of the water is used by agriculture, which makes up 2% of the state's GDP.

    You could move out half the population tomorrow, and the other half could stop bathing entirely, and you wouldn't notice the difference.

  2. Re:You'll just steall their property, right? on How California Is Winning the Drought · · Score: 1

    Senior water right are property - like real estate, gold, food, houses, cars, home computers.

    In some other dimension where rain falls on an acre of land and stays there forever, sure. But not here. Farmers that think they can drill as much water as they want out of the ground and to hell with everyone else can pound sand.

  3. Re:People isn't the issue, farming is on How California Is Winning the Drought · · Score: 1

    If the shoe fits. One of my favorites is when you claimed an article said Iran was making bomb parts when it didn't come within a light year of a ten foot pool of suggesting that.

  4. Re:People isn't the issue, farming is on How California Is Winning the Drought · · Score: 1

    California produces a sizable majority of many American fruits, vegetables, and nuts: 99 percent of artichokes, 99 percent of walnuts, 97 percent of kiwis, 97 percent of plums, 95 percent of celery, 95 percent of garlic, 89 percent of cauliflower, 71 percent of spinach, and 69 percent of carrots (and the list goes on and on). Some of this is due to climate and soil

    The problem with this oft-repeated chestnut is that you can grow most of those crops just as well in Michigan as you can in California, as long as it's not during the winter. Spinach in particular is extremely tolerant of low temperatures.

    A sane ag policy would have the midwest growing less corn for livestock and ethanol, and more produce. California would grow produce when the northern part of the country could not, and otherwise plant fruit that cannot grow outside of sunny climates.

  5. Re:Agriculture uses way more water than residents on How California Is Winning the Drought · · Score: 1

    The best solution is to let the farmers sell the water to the residents instead of growing the crops. It's just a comparison of the profit from growing an almond vs. selling to residents at retail rates. Win-win right?

    If you believe in non-productive, rent seeking middle men and the right of the few to exploit the many, because capitalism and property rights, sure.

  6. Re:Agriculture uses way more water than residents on How California Is Winning the Drought · · Score: 1

    And if it wasn't dammed it would flow straight into the ocean with no net difference. Claiming that counts is Randian Dumbfuckery.

  7. Re:There is no "drought" in California on How California Is Winning the Drought · · Score: 1

    You can't install sunshine in the Great Plains.

    Red herring for most crops for much of the year. No, you cannot grow tomatoes in South Dakota in January. You can grow them just fine, though, spring through fall.

    So, rather than grow tomatoes year round in California, grow them during winter months when other states can't. Use that water instead for oranges or avocados, which cannot grow in northern climates.

  8. Re:There is no "drought" in California on How California Is Winning the Drought · · Score: 1

    Distinction without much of a difference. Greedy farmers are over-consuming the water supply far beyond sustainable levels.

  9. Re:A billion gallons isn't much. on How California Is Winning the Drought · · Score: 1

    So color me unimpressed that conservation by reduced human consumption results in 1/4 of that amount being saved.

    That's because human consumption makes up just over 10% of the state's water use, and much of that is for swimming pools and golf courses for the 1%. Half the population of California could move out of the state tomorrow, and other half could cease bathing, and you'd barely notice the difference.

    Time to get serious about desalination

    Why??? So taxpayers can keep up the capitalist facade that we live in a world of unlimited resources for unlimited exploitation? How about we reign in the batshit insanity of:

    The Sacramento Valley rice paddys flood to a depth of 5 inches. This utilizes 80B gallons of water, in order to irrigate the 600,000 acres under cultivation in rice. On top of this, it requires another 4B gallons of water a day to deal with the evaporation losses.

    Ban rice patties. Ban cattle ranching. Ban almond farms, that use one gallon of water to produce one almond. If those industries don't like it, let them build their own damn desalinization plant, not expect taxpayers to do it for them.

  10. Re:And yet, they are NOT winning on How California Is Winning the Drought · · Score: 1

    desalinating along their coast line

    More like subsidizing greedy farmers with taxpayer money. California has more than enough water for it's population. What it doesn't have is an unlimited supply of water to satiate the unlimited greed of almond farmers, in particular, abusing grandfathered water rights.

  11. Re:Global Warming brings more water overall on How California Is Winning the Drought · · Score: 1

    Ignores droughts, water sources from glaciers or snowpack melting, and climate change in general. If a region goes from 25 inches a rain to 15 inches, how is that 'more water'?

  12. Re:Or let us keep our hard-earned money on Clinton Promises 500 Million New Solar Panels · · Score: 1

    The only thing that has ever worked is to tie the hands of government and the framers knew it.

    That's putting your Randian clown shoes on. Pretending that banning lead paint is one step away from Soviet gulags is as sensible as saying that starting your own software consulting business is one step away from trafficking human sex slaves. Because what one business does, all businesses will do.

    As sensible....or as asinine.

  13. Re:Where in the US Constitution..... on Clinton Promises 500 Million New Solar Panels · · Score: 1

    I"m still trying to thumb through my US Constitution and find where within the enumerated responsibilities and rights of the Federal Govt. that it is charged with picking winners and losers in industry.

    It's in the Moran's appendix for Randians. Keep looking, you'll find it.

  14. Re:Yeah, be a man! on Two Years Later, White House Responds To 'Pardon Edward Snowden' Petition · · Score: 1

    Not the point, fuckwit. What part of "ignoring the felonies from the USG and the Oath of Office that Snowden took, which required him to do exactly what he did" did you have a hard time understanding?

  15. Re:Bridge to Nowhere! on Epic Mega Bridge To Connect America With Russia Gets Closer To Reality · · Score: 1

    No, she mentioned it to point out that she was governor of a state that's a lot closer to a semi-hostile foreign power

    Your American Exceptionalism is showing again.

    She wasn't presidential material

    She's a freaking moron who couldn't find her ass with both hands.

  16. Re:Anyone besides me think he's a criminal? on Two Years Later, White House Responds To 'Pardon Edward Snowden' Petition · · Score: 1

    So, it's

    • C) You're a fascist and an authoritarian shill

    as there is no D. Well, that and you DGAF about the infinitely greater lawbreaking revealed by Snowden. That kinda outs you.

  17. Re:Translation on Two Years Later, White House Responds To 'Pardon Edward Snowden' Petition · · Score: 1

    cold fjord & Rei must be on vacation. Either that or they are modding, as the fascist trolls and bootlicking authoritarians keep getting uprated.

  18. Re:I'd be more sympathetic if he weren't a doucheb on Two Years Later, White House Responds To 'Pardon Edward Snowden' Petition · · Score: 1

    Snowden was about advancing HIS image and person and not so much about exposing something that was wrong.

    20 pounds of fascist dumbfuck in a 5 pound shill sack.

  19. Re:Yeah, be a man! on Two Years Later, White House Responds To 'Pardon Edward Snowden' Petition · · Score: 4

    What Snowden did was no doubt wrong

    Only if you're a bootlicking fascist. A bootlicking fascist ignoring the billions of felonies committed by the USG with their warrantless spying. A bootlicking fascist ignoring the felonies from the USG and the Oath of Office that Snowden took, which required him to do exactly what he did.

  20. Re:No surprises there... on Two Years Later, White House Responds To 'Pardon Edward Snowden' Petition · · Score: 1

    I disagree that he is not liberal

    Not possible. Obama could have challenged any of his Republican predecessors from the right. The far right. Unless you're still an Obamabot in 2015, and believing the words coming out of his mouth while ignoring his actions.

  21. Re:"Jury of peers" on Two Years Later, White House Responds To 'Pardon Edward Snowden' Petition · · Score: 1

    Once his feet hit US soil, he will have a criminal trial just like anybody else.

    Not "just like anybody else", as the Espionage Act prevents Snowden from arguing his actions were justified. A U.S. trial is a one-way ticket to spending the rest of his life in prison.

  22. Re:Pardons are for guilty people. on Two Years Later, White House Responds To 'Pardon Edward Snowden' Petition · · Score: 1

    Definition of fascist bootlicker. Snowden took an oath to defend the Constitution - an oath that required him to do exactly what he did. You clowns also reveal yourself when you DGAF over the billions of felonies committed by the USG, but want Snowden strung up by his toenails.

  23. Re:As if America has a great track record either? on Iran Has Signed a Nuclear Accord · · Score: 1

    That it's ok for Iran to lie and get nuclear weapons because the US did bad stuff?

    On some other planet where even Mossad admits Iran wasn't running a nuclear weapons program?

    Wow, you're such a friendly moron I can't resist writing back.

    If you say so.

  24. Re:But what is the alternative, objectors? on Iran Has Signed a Nuclear Accord · · Score: 1

    A) continue the sanctions, even after they already achieved their goal
    B) Military intervention.. yet again.

    Or.....

    C) Stop being imperialistic shitbags

    As a signatory to the NPT, Iran already had the right to enrich uranium to any levels. And as even Mossad has been willing to tell you, for quite some time....Iran has no nuclear weapons program.

    Given the fact that Iran hasn't attacked another country in a couple hundred years, how does it many a wit of sense that the sanctions aren't being placed on the U.S. and Israel instead. The U.S., because it's ignoring the disarmament provisions of the NPT, and Israel for possessing ~200 nukes and a penchant for launching first strikes upon it's neighbors.

  25. Re:NEWSFLASH - Slimy politician is slimy on Barney Frank Defends Political Hypocrisy, Game Theory Explains It · · Score: 1

    Pretty much as I said: Hillary is a freakshow, and she is far out right-wing. All the fascism you could want, from signing the TPP to expanding the police state. Like Obama, the key is to ignore the words coming out of their mouths, the false promises to their base, and look at what they do.

    If you believe the words coming out of her mouth now that she's on the campaign trail, I have to ask if you think pron stars are naturally blonde and big boobed.