Slashdot Mirror


User: Uberbah

Uberbah's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
9,862
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 9,862

  1. Re:A win for freedom on U.S. Supreme Court Upholds Religious Objections To Contraception · · Score: 1

    They put their profits into humanitarian endeavors.

    Also known as tax write-offs, free PR, expanding marketshare, or setting an agenda. Like when Microsoft gets press for giving away "millions" in software to schools, or the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation backs Common Core, which is part of turning public education into a profit center.

    You obviously have to clue what is actually the case here, with this corporation.

    Watching out for falling shards of glass when throwing rocks. Hobby Lobby is invested in the pharmaceutical companies that makes these drugs, imports most of their products from mandatory-abortion China, and like any Christofascist group, doesn't give a rat's ass that IFV clinics throw away far more fertilized embryos than have ever been denied implantation via Plan B.

  2. Re:No right to breech, pollute, destroy, ... on U.S. Supreme Court Upholds Religious Objections To Contraception · · Score: 1

    Boring straw man is boring.

  3. Bzzzzzt yourself on U.S. Supreme Court Upholds Religious Objections To Contraception · · Score: 1

    Individuals can be sued of fraud or criminal intent can be proven, not matter what protection the corporation has for it's assets.

    In theory - but in practice that's a joke. No executives have gone to jail or personally finned for blowing up that fertilizer plant, dumping oil all over the gulf, toxic chemicals into that river in West Virginia, Countrywide from stealing people's homes, or the major banks for crashing the economy.

  4. Re:A win for freedom on U.S. Supreme Court Upholds Religious Objections To Contraception · · Score: 1

    There is no justification for forcing anyone to pay for anything.

    Health insurance is part of a employees compensation, so take that Randian bullshit somewhere else.

  5. Re: A win for freedom on U.S. Supreme Court Upholds Religious Objections To Contraception · · Score: 1

    wouldn't pay for pills that cause the abortion of an embryo

    Repeating Big Lies doesn't make them true, it just makes the person repeating it a bigger liar.

  6. Re:A win for freedom on U.S. Supreme Court Upholds Religious Objections To Contraception · · Score: 1

    It's someone's choice to work there as well as someone's choice to offer them a job.

    Yes, that's the self-contradicting right-wing storyline. Contradicting, because every right winger well tell you it's your god given responsibility to go out and get a job. Which means it's not a choice.

  7. amoritized vs up front on U.S. Supreme Court Upholds Religious Objections To Contraception · · Score: 1

    You got that backward, though. An IUD is considerably cheaper than the pill.

    Because $5 out of your payday is the same thing as $400 out of your payday, when you're living paycheck to paycheck.

  8. Re:Gee Catholic judges on U.S. Supreme Court Upholds Religious Objections To Contraception · · Score: 1

    Personal responsibility. Some don't believe in it, they think it's the Government's job to use your money and mine to help people who aren't capable of engaging in it.

    And some people know that's irrelevant Randian whining in when the subject is health insurance that is a part of an employees compensation.

    The GP isn't worth replying too

    Translation: you don't actually have a response, so you're going to troll instead.

    Last time I checked you can't cure AIDS with a visit to the abortion clinic....

    Last time I checked, you aren't going to get AIDS in a monogamous relationship after you've both been tested, troll.

  9. Re:Gee Catholic judges on U.S. Supreme Court Upholds Religious Objections To Contraception · · Score: 1

    Then you're an evil, greedy person who wants the poor to pay a higher percentage of their meager incomes, while you pay less despite getting more out of taxpayer funded services. The Income Tax is by far the most fair form of taxation ever devised.

  10. Re:Gee Catholic judges on U.S. Supreme Court Upholds Religious Objections To Contraception · · Score: 1

    The analogies are no more or less absurd

    Your analogies were crap, deal.

    because it is predicated on the absurd idea that it makes sense for people to get their health insurance from their employer

    Calling that absurd is absurd when it's how most people in the U.S. get their health insurance. Whereas no one is forced to eat bacon sandwiches, or whatever other nonsense you've decided to cook up.

  11. Re:Bad media coverage on U.S. Supreme Court Upholds Religious Objections To Contraception · · Score: 1

    No, the problem was that Dan Cathy expressed an unpopular opinion and THEN (and only then) his charity organization came under fire.

    Events or people given more media exposure get more attention: this and other shocking developments at 11.

  12. Re:Bad media coverage on U.S. Supreme Court Upholds Religious Objections To Contraception · · Score: 1

    It was his comments that set it off, and his comments were no different than those expressed by Obama and Clinton (both) over the years. The difference is that he's an evil "conservative" and they're "Democrats".

    Right, don't let hard facts about donations get in the way of a good false equivalency. And I say that as a person who spent years trashing Obama for his homophobia and broken promises.

  13. Re:Bad media coverage on U.S. Supreme Court Upholds Religious Objections To Contraception · · Score: 1

    Obama--for all of his many problems--has done more than any other president to support equal protection under law for people who are LGBT.

    By likening homosexuality to bestiality in federal court? Obama had to be dragged, kicking and screaming, into supporting some of his campaign promises on LGBT rights. It wasn't until boycotts of his re-election campaign started to take off before he decided to get off his ass and....sign legislation passed by Congress.

  14. Re:Bad media coverage on U.S. Supreme Court Upholds Religious Objections To Contraception · · Score: 1

    I'm a gay man. I give to groups promoting atheism because I consider Christianity to be immoral. Are you going to persecute me as well in the name of tolerance?

    Then you're a gay man with a pathetic attempt at a false equivalency. However, as a gay man, you would have faced bigotry for your sexuality, with a good chunk of that bigotry based on religion, and thus wouldn't try to pull stupid BS like pretending atheism is equivalent to Christianist nonsense. So it's more likely that you're a heterosexual troll.

  15. Re:Bad media coverage on U.S. Supreme Court Upholds Religious Objections To Contraception · · Score: 1

    No they weren't, idiot.

    Other than giving large sums of money to homophobic organizations to block gay rights.

    People like you need to pull their head out of their ass.

    You were saying?

  16. Re:Bad media coverage on U.S. Supreme Court Upholds Religious Objections To Contraception · · Score: 1

    It's as stupid and disgusting as wanting to forbid medical treatment to former smokers on moral grounds.

    Good thing that's just a straw man, then.

  17. Re:slippery slope argument on U.S. Supreme Court Upholds Religious Objections To Contraception · · Score: 0

    IMO, this whole fuss on Plan B is kind of a crock. It costs about $50 at a drug store

    Your crock. First, because health insurance is a part of an employee's compensation, so you're asking them to double pay. Secondly, because $50 might make the difference between having a place to stay next month or getting an eviction notice. And skip the Puritanical abstinence response, since that's another crock in itself.

  18. Re:Bad media coverage on U.S. Supreme Court Upholds Religious Objections To Contraception · · Score: 1

    tl;dr version:

    If keeping a fertilized egg from emplanting is "abortion", then why isn't Operation Rescue trying to shut down IVF clinics, since they throw away tens of thousands of unused fertilized eggs in the trash.

  19. Re:We are doomed on U.S. Supreme Court Upholds Religious Objections To Contraception · · Score: 1

    A significant minority of men then fail to contribute to those expenses.

    And the vast majority of those men are behind because they are unable, not unwilling to pay. Same thing for non-custodial mothers behind on their child support payments.

  20. Re:Companies don't pay for healthcare, workers do on U.S. Supreme Court Upholds Religious Objections To Contraception · · Score: 1

    And contrary to the previous poster's statement which you seem to think is correct, this is not about anyone telling you what health care services you can have.

    Of course it is, for people of limited means. Which applies to most of Hobby Lobby's workers, since they don't get paid much.

    It is about the government forcing someone to violate their faith.

    Bullshit:
    1) Hobby Lobby was fine with covering these meds before it was mandatory
    2) They're invested in the pharmaceutical companies selling said meds
    3) All their products come from China with it's mandatory abortions
    4) Arguing you have the right to to mess around with other people's lives, cuz religion, is always bullshit, whether it's contraceptives, gay rights, or segregation.

    You can still have all the abortions you want, you can still have all the birth control you want.

    While having to double pay for it, since health insurance is part of your compensation. Hobby Lobby is still happy to cover Viagra and vasectomies, though.

    It seems your problems with religion has clouded your thought process to the point you cannot see logic. Maybe it is time to step back and take a deep breath.

    Maybe you could stop being a dumbass for five seconds. Under the same logic in this ruling, if your company is owned by Jehovah's Witnesses, they could deny you coverage for blood transfusions. Or if you work for a Scientologist, any kind of psychiatric medication. Of course, SCOTUS tied themselves into pretzels to avoid that exact sort of outcome, which means they're favoring one religious sect over another, which means this is all buuuuuuuuuuuuuuuullshit.

  21. Re:Companies don't pay for healthcare, workers do on U.S. Supreme Court Upholds Religious Objections To Contraception · · Score: 1

    Someone doesn't have the slightest clue about how employer-provided healthcare works?

    Since health insurance is part of an employee's compensation, that person seems to be you.

  22. Re:Bad Precedence on U.S. Supreme Court Upholds Religious Objections To Contraception · · Score: 1

    The law requires the government to make an effort to avoid forcing people to do things they object to religiously.

    And the Scientologists have just as sincere objections to mental health care.

    If you actually read the court decision, instead of spewing forth ignorant inanity, then you'll find the answer. It's a fairly well designed two-part test

    It's the most nakedly bullshit ruling from a bunch of partisan hacks since Bush v Gore. They carved out a ruling for a very specific set of "sincere beliefs" while the rest can pound sand. Until JW's and Scientologists and Christian Scientists start filing their own cases based on the same "sincere beliefs" standard the Court just laid out, and the whole mess becomes an even bigger farce than it already is.

    But no need for you to worry about it. Go on shopping at Hobby Lobby, where 99.9999% of their products come from the People's Republic of Force Abortions in China.

  23. Re:Insurance and Employment on U.S. Supreme Court Upholds Religious Objections To Contraception · · Score: 1

    So what might have cost a family (then) $50/mo, would cost the company $25/mo.

    That and it creates a barrier for employees to freely move between jobs, when you have to wait six months for your next insurance to kick in, fight with the insurance company for pre-existing conditions, etc. Which makes it easier to take employees for granted, or even abuse them.

  24. Re:my jimmies are clearly rustled. on U.S. Supreme Court Upholds Religious Objections To Contraception · · Score: 1

    No it doesn't......the court decision is fairly clear why this reducto ad absurdum would be ruled out under the law.

    Nothing absurd about it. Either companies owned by Jehovah's Witnesses are free to deny blood transfusions for their "sincerely held beliefs", or one religious sect is getting blatant favoritism over others, something the 1st Amendment was supposed to prevent.

    Pick one.

  25. Re:We are doomed on U.S. Supreme Court Upholds Religious Objections To Contraception · · Score: 1

    Stop with the butthurt.

    Stop with the willful obtuseness.

    Pay for your own Plan B. This decision doesn't take that away.

    Health insurance is part of an employee's compensation. You're asking the employee to pay for their medication twice - unlike the corporate stooges with their Viagra.