actually, there is a major problem however with launcher able to lift really heavy payload : really heavy payload cost a lot of money and the launcher can just explode and blow all the really heavy & expensive stuff away.
Until such a really huge launcher would have proved itself reliable enough, the "expected cost" (cost times risk) would be higher than lifting a lot of small parts.
There is a need for slighty bigger launchers however.
There is nothing surgical into an object specifically designed to kill. Surgeons try to save any life whatever it is and at any cost. There is absolutely nothing linking the two.
Let's talk about precise missiles, which are a very good thing, indeed, but "surgical weapon" is self-contradicting and a pure propaganda term.
Slashdot Mirror
If you wanted a paradox you should have written : I am from Crete all Cretians are liars and all liars are Cretians.
and you look like someone who has been successfully spin-doctored. Usage of a medical-related word is certainly not innocent.
actually, there is a major problem however with launcher able to lift really heavy payload : really heavy payload cost a lot of money and the launcher can just explode and blow all the really heavy & expensive stuff away. Until such a really huge launcher would have proved itself reliable enough, the "expected cost" (cost times risk) would be higher than lifting a lot of small parts. There is a need for slighty bigger launchers however.
There is nothing surgical into an object specifically designed to kill. Surgeons try to save any life whatever it is and at any cost. There is absolutely nothing linking the two. Let's talk about precise missiles, which are a very good thing, indeed, but "surgical weapon" is self-contradicting and a pure propaganda term.