I'm no legal scholar, but this latest claim from SCO seems to not only not make sense but also to undermine their previous claims. I think this is just a little more evidence to support my claim that this whole operation is nothing more than a smear campaign aimed at injecting confusion and doubt in the OS marketplace. I wonder who would benefit from such a campaign.
I'm no legal scholar, but this latest claim from SCO seems to not only not make sense but also to undermine their previous claims. I think this is just a little more evidence to support my claim that this whole operation is nothing more than a smear campaign aimed at injecting confusion and doubt in the OS marketplace. I wonder who would benefit from such a campaign.