Security is really for the Paranoid with a Big 'P'.;-)
It doesn't matter whether one is paranoid or not... they're still out to get you!
Re:The future? Just like the past should be...
on
More on Columbia
·
· Score: 1
You'll note also that it took people outsid of NASA to subversively reveal the trouble with the O-rings. NASA itself ( as well as Morton-Thiokol) tried to everything they could to bury the whole thing under "spin." They're going about it now too, if you look carefully.
I suggest you take a look at these email messages released by NASA. Are they telling us everything they know? I doubt it. But this doesn't appear to be an attempt to bury the whole thing under "spin" either.
> 2) Randomize the response time
How about only randomizing the response time for error messages?
> 3) Maybe even: Compute everything even in case of early failure
That gives a boost to people waging denial of service attacks unless you also...
> 4) And of course the system should never ever accept more than N failures
Slashdot Mirror
It doesn't matter whether one is paranoid or not... they're still out to get you!
I suggest you take a look at these email messages released by NASA. Are they telling us everything they know? I doubt it. But this doesn't appear to be an attempt to bury the whole thing under "spin" either.
> 2) Randomize the response time How about only randomizing the response time for error messages? > 3) Maybe even: Compute everything even in case of early failure That gives a boost to people waging denial of service attacks unless you also... > 4) And of course the system should never ever accept more than N failures