There, that is correct! Seriously, dude, for the sake of brevity can I catch a break? Trust me, I've produced much more incorrect shit than this but you only get so many characters in the title.
Leaving out some details because of character limitations is one thing, but the headline is just plain wrong. I don't know what the character limit is, but based on another of today's headline's (about the Canadian DMCA) it is at least 80 characters:
Funnyjunk's lawyer sues owner of The Oatmeal for "Incitement to Cyber-Vandalism"
If they do, then the government can't do anything with those 12 kiddy porn pics
Not true. While warrants do require a clear indication of what is being searched for, any other evidence that is stumbled across during the execution of the warrant is absolutely usable and admissable.
To use a more extreme example, if cops are executing a search warrant to look for a gun in your house and they stumble across that 50 plant grow operation in the basement while they're searching, you're in a heap of hurt.
Slashdot Mirror
There, that is correct! Seriously, dude, for the sake of brevity can I catch a break? Trust me, I've produced much more incorrect shit than this but you only get so many characters in the title.
Leaving out some details because of character limitations is one thing, but the headline is just plain wrong. I don't know what the character limit is, but based on another of today's headline's (about the Canadian DMCA) it is at least 80 characters:
Funnyjunk's lawyer sues owner of The Oatmeal for "Incitement to Cyber-Vandalism"
How fucking hard is that?
Not true. While warrants do require a clear indication of what is being searched for, any other evidence that is stumbled across during the execution of the warrant is absolutely usable and admissable. To use a more extreme example, if cops are executing a search warrant to look for a gun in your house and they stumble across that 50 plant grow operation in the basement while they're searching, you're in a heap of hurt.