Elvis @Home? Imagine millions of computers, all searching for Elvis. We're guaranteed to find him, and then we can end the rumors of his death by causing it.
T@lk3n der Smacken & Pass the sauce
on
Linux on Jeopardy
·
· Score: 1
I actually don't care either way how to say it. Years ago when I was Installing Linux no-one I knew cared. Some said it one way, others another. I'll actually say it both ways mattering on my mode/mood.
What bakes my noodle
Is when some corp Type Bandwagon $Grubber, who _HAS NEVER INSTALLED LINUX_ corrects me. Besides that call it what you will
>He did get right the part about how there's no >common code of ethics -- an attribute he might >find is shared by many sectors of street criminals, >marketing executives and politicians.
Good Point. But that's sorta mean to politicians to group them with marketing. *grin*
After reading many more Posts I start to get the idea about whats up with this guy.I allways get a little touchy when Media takes the attitude of My this and we need to, in such a possessive tone.
On the bight side; * one can't control what he/she doesn't understand * DefCon is meant to be Fun + Informative, so if he left concerned and confused, then he missed the point!
So, in the meantime, we must find a way to require our hackers to be ethical. For me,this was the real message of DEF CON: dangerous knowledge and tools, in the hands of people without ethics, are dangerous. We need a Hippocratic Oath for hackers, and perhaps some Guardian Angels to sniff out the bad apples. And we really, really need to know whom we can trust. Otherwise, we have little hope of making the mean streets of the Internet safe for all of us.
Our hackers ?? As in the people we/I own or control ?? what a kook! Sorry but I had to say it...... End_Vent=true
Elvis @Home? Imagine millions of computers, all
searching for Elvis. We're guaranteed to find him, and then we can end the rumors of his death by causing it.
I actually don't care either way how to say it.
Years ago when I was Installing Linux no-one I knew cared. Some said it one way, others another. I'll actually say it both ways mattering on my mode/mood.
What bakes my noodle
Is when some corp Type Bandwagon $Grubber, who _HAS NEVER INSTALLED LINUX_ corrects me. Besides that call it what you will
JustBe
_Chunk
>common code of ethics -- an attribute he might
>find is shared by many sectors of street criminals,
>marketing executives and politicians.
Good Point.
But that's sorta mean to politicians to group them with marketing. *grin*
After reading many more Posts I start to get the idea about whats up with this guy.I allways get a little touchy when Media takes the attitude of My this and we need to, in such a possessive tone.
On the bight side;
* one can't control what he/she doesn't understand
* DefCon is meant to be Fun + Informative, so if he left concerned and confused, then he missed the point!
_Chunk
--Results may vary
So, in the meantime, we must find a way to require our hackers to be ethical. For me,this was the real message of DEF CON: dangerous knowledge and tools, in the hands of people without ethics, are dangerous. We need a Hippocratic Oath for hackers, and perhaps some Guardian Angels to sniff out the bad apples. And we really, really need to know whom we can trust. Otherwise, we have little hope of making the mean streets of the Internet safe for all of us.
Our hackers ??
As in the people we/I own or control ??
what a kook!
Sorry but I had to say it......
End_Vent=true