Slashdot Mirror


User: dillkvast

dillkvast's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
33
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 33

  1. Re:Go China! on China Proposes Rival Video Format · · Score: 0

    But not everything is open. I think of "the great firewall of China" among other things. But adding 6 billon people to the OSS movement might be a good thing.

  2. For more computing power... on In-Dash DIN-form-factor Car PC · · Score: 0

    ... one migt want to look at the BriQ instead. Not DIN formfactor but you should be able to fit it in a dashboard.

  3. Re:Actually it may be sooner than you expect. on Will Humanoid Robots Take All the Jobs by 2050? · · Score: 0

    Each transistor can perform at 2.000.000.000 calculations per second

    Wrong

    These CPU's uses complementary logic, so even the inverter, the simplest logic gate, uses two transistors. The NAND and XOR uses four and so on. The Rule of Thumb(tm) is two transistor per gate input. A 1-bit fulladder will use some 24-30 transistors. And the adder is the simplest aritmetic module. The transistors operate faster than this anyway, since several logical operations is performed serially i each pipeline step.

  4. Re:Render the HTML then use OCR on The Growing Field Guide To Spam Techniques · · Score: 0

    You are right... But, how can you see if there is a message in the image, or if its just your sombody sending you some picures from yeaterdays party or a screenshot? If you have "non-geek"- friends, chance is they will be using (iack)Outlook which happily sends HTML.

  5. Re:Render the HTML then use OCR on The Growing Field Guide To Spam Techniques · · Score: 1

    This may actually be something worth looking into. A lot of todays spam embed the message into images as well. This makes traditionally bayesian filtering impossible, because the rest of the mail can be "poisioned" with ligitimate words.

    However combining i.e. Clara OCR with a HTML renderer and a bayesian filtering suit might work. Of course this will require a lot more computing power.

  6. Re:Does making this public help spammers? on The Growing Field Guide To Spam Techniques · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Don't agree. This is sorta the same as the idea behind "full disclosure" of security issues. The underground know all the tricks, and thus it is better that the sysadmins out there also have some idea of whats going on. This keeps us (the filtermakers more exactly) one step closer. Alot of these filters are OSS anyway. So the spammers can design there spam to circumvent the filters. They can even buy properitary filters and just test against them when designing spam.

  7. Re:"Tricks?" on The Growing Field Guide To Spam Techniques · · Score: 5, Funny

    And for crying out loud, "spam" is not an acronym so stop writing it in upper case!

    Actually writing it uppercase suggests that you are crying it out loud.

  8. Re:and no posting of the exploit code? on Major Flaw Found In Cisco IOS Devices · · Score: 3, Funny

    what the hell do you call CiscoWorks???

    Today "CiscoWorks" would probably be a contradiction in terms.