"No, the industrial capitalists just found new ways to put us (and now our wives too, who are no longer required for housework thanks to all these appliances) to work for their own insatiable greed."
You sir, have that utterly backwards. People's desire for stuff drives them to work. One worker families abound in areas (usually not cities) because the people there don't need $250K dollar houses and new cars every year. The "Big, Bad Capitalists" are just selling the stuff people want. An example is your computer. You really don't need it for a happy and productive life, but you have it. Many people have it primarily to play games. Certainly not needed.
Don't want to be a "slave"? Don't have so much stuff.
Flippantly, how many buggy whips are in your collection?
Seriously, Google Maps would be a bitch to use that way. I use a site frequently that displays a raft of photos to select from. These are categorized by some feature. Again, it would be a bitch to pop up forty-eight different pics in order to select the one I want.
Yeah, but unfortunately for your argument, FOSS engineering software catch-up is *exactly* the linch-pin that this particular foray depends from. They're not looking to develop CAD software, they're looking to develop rockets. FOSS is only good for those who want to develop something while it's underway. It's only good for everyone else after it works and has sufficient functionality. Life - it's a bitch.
Trite and may have been a good argument around 1875, possibly 1900.
Lines one and two constitute a good point, humorously delivered. Three on are a pompous screed directed at your perception that Americans are pompous. Good humor there as well, albeit irony.
No, it could mean the person in IT with the AOL account hasn't changed, has multiple accounts or has another reason you don't know about. You can't read minds, you know.
Apparently, it has been too hard for the average person in America to organize vote changing rationale so that certain possession laws get struck down. That is the fulcrum.
And just why aren't those engineers getting into the bucket and launching themselves at a target? Oh, they don't have a fanatical belief to die for. Love of project != wanting to die.
You say that as if it were true rather than an opinion of yours. You do understand the fundamentalist Muslims are the primary killers and mass-killers of and in the Muslim world, right?
Says the pasty white out of shape, late teenage boy living in mom's basement and typing on his provided computer and connection whist in his underwear.
All of whom are trying to advance a hundred years to get out of their wretched existences. Discussion resumed.
"No, the industrial capitalists just found new ways to put us (and now our wives too, who are no longer required for housework thanks to all these appliances) to work for their own insatiable greed."
You sir, have that utterly backwards. People's desire for stuff drives them to work. One worker families abound in areas (usually not cities) because the people there don't need $250K dollar houses and new cars every year. The "Big, Bad Capitalists" are just selling the stuff people want. An example is your computer. You really don't need it for a happy and productive life, but you have it. Many people have it primarily to play games. Certainly not needed.
Don't want to be a "slave"? Don't have so much stuff.
Flippantly, how many buggy whips are in your collection?
Seriously, Google Maps would be a bitch to use that way. I use a site frequently that displays a raft of photos to select from. These are categorized by some feature. Again, it would be a bitch to pop up forty-eight different pics in order to select the one I want.
Agreed. I once had a man who restored old Victrolas tell me that they actually produced a more accurate sound.
"It works like this for you, for me, and for everybody."
Do not project. Advertising doesn't work on everybody. All you're saying is it works on you and therefore you think it must work on everybody. Untrue.
Yeah, but unfortunately for your argument, FOSS engineering software catch-up is *exactly* the linch-pin that this particular foray depends from. They're not looking to develop CAD software, they're looking to develop rockets. FOSS is only good for those who want to develop something while it's underway. It's only good for everyone else after it works and has sufficient functionality. Life - it's a bitch.
That may be the classic reply, but the more standard response is "Check the dead projects file."
..."
"contribute a couple hours a week
It is more time and cost effective for an accountant to purchase a professional package.
"chances are in the process the time spent in the trenches will gain you a much better insight into the fundamental nature of your craft."
He would gain insights into the fundamental nature of accountancy by contributing a couple of hours of slack labor a week? Explain please.
"you being such a new country"
Trite and may have been a good argument around 1875, possibly 1900.
Lines one and two constitute a good point, humorously delivered. Three on are a pompous screed directed at your perception that Americans are pompous. Good humor there as well, albeit irony.
Holy Christ, I hope you were being funny.
Actually, it only became something someone *called* art.
CGI won't, but a robot could. With sufficiently developed software.
Which he murdered by making the Unobtanium unobtain.... ium.
"If that is what you'll have to deal with in the future, you will have to learn the necesary social skills for virtual meetings."
Or you could use video conferencing. Oh wait, we already do that. Ain't "cutting edge".
No, it could mean the person in IT with the AOL account hasn't changed, has multiple accounts or has another reason you don't know about. You can't read minds, you know.
*godaddy*? I'd toss that one immediately.
"... any bias that the sorter has will ..."
Sounds like the people you describe also reject anyone with a name that sounds to "different".
They can do 30mph pretty much all day. They are the most efficient flier amongst the insects.
Self-idolatry is a religion too.
Apparently, it has been too hard for the average person in America to organize vote changing rationale so that certain possession laws get struck down. That is the fulcrum.
"our system already provides a mechanism (a warrant) to get that information"
Our system has two mechanisms. A request which can be followed by a warrant.
"protected information about someone"
Are you sure this data was legally protected against the kind of release that happened?
And just why aren't those engineers getting into the bucket and launching themselves at a target? Oh, they don't have a fanatical belief to die for. Love of project != wanting to die.
You say that as if it were true rather than an opinion of yours. You do understand the fundamentalist Muslims are the primary killers and mass-killers of and in the Muslim world, right?
Says the pasty white out of shape, late teenage boy living in mom's basement and typing on his provided computer and connection whist in his underwear.
Only welfare and corporate welfare fall within his definition. Schools, military, government and roads are taxes for the sum, not an individual.
He said legitimate moral, not legal.