Your point is what?
A general block would be to prevent spoofing with non-Latin chars, so you seem to be arguing that, *despite the spoofing danger*, you want to be able to mix language symbols in the domain.
To what end, other than personal satisfaction?
There are some things we don't need because they facilitate bad or criminal behavior. Mixing language chars in order to decieve someone, we can live without IMO. Unless you can show a good cause to keep them anyway.
1. No, when they kill civilians indescriminatly, they are called terrorists.
2. No, when they blow up the OK building, or bomb PP, they are called terrorists.
Just waving guns and quoting some old book doesn't cut it in either case.
Right. And the prehistoric vulture-worshipers were there before them. So what?
Keep fighting the wars of thousands of years ago and you'll keep their mentality too.
"most of the heart of the Arab world was once Jewish"
You apparently have no problem in making false statements. Back it up with links to good documentation.
In this instance, that implication would be correct.
This particular reported was being sheltered by the editor because of his race. That makes it relevant.
If you asked your question, the answer would have to be preceeded by "Which reporter?"
Don't take my word for it. There are a number of good dissections of what went on at NYT.
If students regularly cheat in written exams, it's a good sign that the exams are pointless. The proper response is to ask "why are students so unmotivated that they don't bother to make an original contribution", not "how can we catch and punish the bastards one more time."
Sadly it's always simpler to turn complex questions into easy "wrong and right" issues.
The "teacher/official should be the one paying". And pass on the cost to the student, just like books, paper, pencils......
'Grading and detection'. Which are paid for by the student.
'their students are not trustworthy' Since students cheat, they're not trustworthy. Merely checking for plagerism is assumption of guilt by default.
'attempting to fail' All grades are an attempt to pass/fail. You would do what, let them go their merry way with no indication that they learned, did not learn, cheated?
Shame on you for not understanding what teaching is.
Bullshit.
First, the professor has chosen his method of detecting cheating. If it is personal perusal, fine; if it is automated, fine. The student is charged for anything that pertains to the class, moot.
Second, you appear to have a low view of humans. If I think you are pompous, will you act pompous?
*You* may believe 'that if you expect certain behavior' you get it, but that is only *your* opinion. I don't think an honest person would cheat because anti-cheating (like a professor hand-checking a paper) it in effect.
It *is* pervasive. Where is your head?
That's because scientists who are Christians do not rely on "poof". And, Christians who are scientists usually DO believe in evolution. Only a few don't.
Yep. The prey on smaller insects that fall on the water surface. If you have a 1/2" strider, give it a surface of about 4'sq. Put a lid on the tank, they can fly.
His titles all start with "A Revolution in Family Values" or "The Ultimate Guide to Family Values".
Folks, this is just another end-run by the ultra-right Christian assholes who are busy screwing up society for all of us.
My guess is no one will *wish* to use his ethical chart. They'll no doubt have a better version of their own.
"Finally, here's a little exercise for you."
None of which is done at the business place. That's a bullshit argument.
The machine belongs to the company, not you. Your time for those eight hours belong to the company, not you. When you communicate on their dime, it should be for that dime, not your personal self.
Right. So let's continue using coal. Oh, yeah. Carbon emissions, acid rain, heat dumping, chat disposal. Ever so much better.
Right. So let's use dams. Oh, yeah. River blockage, flooding, bursting dangers. Ever so much better.
Right. So let's burn wood. Oh, yeah. Deforestation, carbon emissions, heat dumping, ash disposal. Ever so much better.
Right. So let's....... let's......
Lack of tech is more dangerous, nimrod.
At first I thought, "What a sad state to get your ego boosted by cheating at a virtual game".
Then I though, "What a sadder state to hold those who do in high regard".
Cheating is the automatic admission that you are not competent.
What makes you think mainframes are all "50 year old stuff"?
When you purposefully ignore a given arena, it is no wonder you don't know what's going on inside it.
Slashdot Mirror
"Unfortunately some people are simply bloody morons"
How very true. Your post supports your argument. Filled with fabrications and crap.
Your point is what?
A general block would be to prevent spoofing with non-Latin chars, so you seem to be arguing that, *despite the spoofing danger*, you want to be able to mix language symbols in the domain.
To what end, other than personal satisfaction?
There are some things we don't need because they facilitate bad or criminal behavior. Mixing language chars in order to decieve someone, we can live without IMO. Unless you can show a good cause to keep them anyway.
1. No, when they kill civilians indescriminatly, they are called terrorists.
2. No, when they blow up the OK building, or bomb PP, they are called terrorists.
Just waving guns and quoting some old book doesn't cut it in either case.
No, it is not; and no, it does not.
Terrorism is the use of terror. It will not work against a competent army, only against civilians.
Right. And the prehistoric vulture-worshipers were there before them. So what?
Keep fighting the wars of thousands of years ago and you'll keep their mentality too.
"most of the heart of the Arab world was once Jewish"
You apparently have no problem in making false statements. Back it up with links to good documentation.
In this instance, that implication would be correct.
This particular reported was being sheltered by the editor because of his race. That makes it relevant.
If you asked your question, the answer would have to be preceeded by "Which reporter?"
Don't take my word for it. There are a number of good dissections of what went on at NYT.
Those who have a conspiracy theory about the death of Dr.Kelly at the hands of the gov need also consider the theory of his death at Gilligan's hands.
Same evidence. None.
In full effect here. The student is innocent until a plagerism is caught, showing guilt. Your point?
Sadly it's always simpler to turn complex questions into easy "wrong and right" issues.
Can you say ironic?
'Grading and detection'. Which are paid for by the student.
'their students are not trustworthy' Since students cheat, they're not trustworthy. Merely checking for plagerism is assumption of guilt by default.
'attempting to fail' All grades are an attempt to pass/fail. You would do what, let them go their merry way with no indication that they learned, did not learn, cheated? Shame on you for not understanding what teaching is.
Bullshit. First, the professor has chosen his method of detecting cheating. If it is personal perusal, fine; if it is automated, fine. The student is charged for anything that pertains to the class, moot. Second, you appear to have a low view of humans. If I think you are pompous, will you act pompous? *You* may believe 'that if you expect certain behavior' you get it, but that is only *your* opinion. I don't think an honest person would cheat because anti-cheating (like a professor hand-checking a paper) it in effect. It *is* pervasive. Where is your head?
That's because scientists who are Christians do not rely on "poof". And, Christians who are scientists usually DO believe in evolution. Only a few don't.
Yep. The prey on smaller insects that fall on the water surface. If you have a 1/2" strider, give it a surface of about 4'sq. Put a lid on the tank, they can fly.
I agree wish your conclusions. Would not a granular space accomplish the same thing, and with much less problems?
Highly abstract, he really says nothing about how to *do* anything. He should have a copyright instead.
His titles all start with "A Revolution in Family Values" or "The Ultimate Guide to Family Values". Folks, this is just another end-run by the ultra-right Christian assholes who are busy screwing up society for all of us. My guess is no one will *wish* to use his ethical chart. They'll no doubt have a better version of their own.
No. Just don't use his ethical connections.
Half a decade? Jeezuz. That's been known for what, 35 years?
"literally thousands of tons of hot waste" Not true.
"Finally, here's a little exercise for you." None of which is done at the business place. That's a bullshit argument. The machine belongs to the company, not you. Your time for those eight hours belong to the company, not you. When you communicate on their dime, it should be for that dime, not your personal self.
Right. So let's continue using coal. Oh, yeah. Carbon emissions, acid rain, heat dumping, chat disposal. Ever so much better. Right. So let's use dams. Oh, yeah. River blockage, flooding, bursting dangers. Ever so much better. Right. So let's burn wood. Oh, yeah. Deforestation, carbon emissions, heat dumping, ash disposal. Ever so much better. Right. So let's....... let's...... Lack of tech is more dangerous, nimrod.
Why the comment about trusting the government when the story is not about the government?
At first I thought, "What a sad state to get your ego boosted by cheating at a virtual game". Then I though, "What a sadder state to hold those who do in high regard". Cheating is the automatic admission that you are not competent.
What makes you think mainframes are all "50 year old stuff"? When you purposefully ignore a given arena, it is no wonder you don't know what's going on inside it.
The acronyms you used indicate you are behind the times.