>personal experience generally turns int personal >prejudice. >Example: how many slashdot >users have used/developed on more than one OS? >And the *nix world counts, essentially, as 1 OS, >btw.
Some of us have. I used Macintosh computers for 4 years, then I primarily used windows for four years(95 for three years, 98 for about one), and I recently switched to linux, as I had gotten sick of windows crashing multiple times an hour. I also occasionally have used DOS, although that would probably be considered windoze by your definitions. Personal experience is not necessarily synonomous with prejudice-I consider linux the best operating system I have tried so far, but still intend to try other operating systems, and I have used windows, but I am not claiming that it is a superior operating system.
irrelevant note-I call myself newbie, because I've been using linux since last sunday/monday.
>Technological solutions combined with civil >disobedience (both overt and covert) are >preferred, at least until martial law is >declared. Ditto, but don't forget education and propaganda-they can be effective as well.
Yes, there have been several proponents of anarcho-capitalism. However, anarchist theory has strong anti-capitalist roots. I believe the general consensus among anarchists is that capitalism is a contradiction or a right wing theory instead of a form of anarchism. For a more detailed discussion of this I recommend checking out the anarcho-capitalist section of the anarchist FAQ (it can be found at spunk press, which has a lot of anarchistic material). In general, anarcho-capitalism relies more on the dictionary root of the word anarchism (greek an-without archos-government, chief, ruler) rather than the past of the theory. Still, anarchism does encourage individual thought. The history is the past, and for the present new ideas are needed. If you can make an arguable case that anarcho-capitalism isn't inherently hierarchal, than I for one consider it a form of anarchy. I am an anarchist.
Anarchism without adjectives (anarchism without adjectives is a theory that anarchists should get along instead of dissmissing the ideas of other anarchists with different ideas as impossible or statist).
Slashdot Mirror
>personal experience generally turns int personal
>prejudice.
>Example: how many slashdot
>users have used/developed on more than one OS?
>And the *nix world counts, essentially, as 1 OS,
>btw.
Some of us have. I used Macintosh computers for 4 years, then I primarily used windows for four years(95 for three years, 98 for about one), and I recently switched to linux, as I had gotten sick of windows crashing multiple times an hour. I also occasionally have used DOS, although that would probably be considered windoze by your definitions. Personal experience is not necessarily synonomous with prejudice-I consider linux the best operating system I have tried so far, but still intend to try other operating systems, and I have used windows, but I am not claiming that it is a superior operating system.
irrelevant note-I call myself newbie, because I've been using linux since last sunday/monday.
>Technological solutions combined with civil
>disobedience (both overt and covert) are
>preferred, at least until martial law is
>declared.
Ditto, but don't forget education and propaganda-they can be effective as well.
Are you sure that someone downloaded the Anarchists Cookbook? To the best of my knowledge, only the chapter on explosives is available online.
Yes, there have been several proponents of anarcho-capitalism. However, anarchist theory has strong anti-capitalist roots. I believe the general consensus among anarchists is that capitalism is a contradiction or a right wing theory instead of a form of anarchism. For a more detailed discussion of this I recommend checking out the anarcho-capitalist section of the anarchist FAQ (it can be found at spunk press, which has a lot of anarchistic material). In general, anarcho-capitalism relies more on the dictionary root of the word anarchism (greek an-without archos-government, chief, ruler) rather than the past of the theory. Still, anarchism does encourage individual thought. The history is the past, and for the present new ideas are needed. If you can make an arguable case that anarcho-capitalism isn't inherently hierarchal, than I for one consider it a form of anarchy.
I am an anarchist.
Anarchism without adjectives (anarchism without adjectives is a theory that anarchists should get along instead of dissmissing the ideas of other anarchists with different ideas as impossible or statist).