cccp, here we come!:)
no, I mean, we should seek those spammers, with baseballbats instead!
that would be the "right" thing to do..
though, from a enviromental point of view, I guess it's better to spam the email, than mail anyway..
i'd rather have my mail free, and with the isp letting someone spam me, for say, valium or some other drug.. (wonder why they always spam me with that!!?? that, and naked woman..:)
ah, well spam, apparently you can't live without it..
tax, you can live without!
Br,
seb
well, i think what you are pointing out is what allready is the problem with "democracy".
people have strong opinions, but rarely know enough, to support them.
in europe we have for each country this yes/no to the european-union-membership question, that i think is a perfect example.
i am not shure that anyone, can tell the full consequence of yes, or no!
but regardless of that fact, NOBODY in media, or at lunch ever recognize this fact.
it is more a question of "culture" (lunch), and "interest(s)" (politics).
this is democracy in a nutshell..
let a bunch of people deside, on something they havent given a second thought, or ever read even one single article about (and if they have read a single article about it, you can bet they know what they talk about!).:)
Slashdot Mirror
echelon... http://www.echelonwatch.org/ -Bruce Lee ;)
cccp, here we come! :)
no, I mean, we should seek those spammers, with baseballbats instead!
that would be the "right" thing to do..
though, from a enviromental point of view, I guess it's better to spam the email, than mail anyway..
i'd rather have my mail free, and with the isp letting someone spam me, for say, valium or some other drug.. (wonder why they always spam me with that!!?? that, and naked woman.. :)
ah, well spam, apparently you can't live without it..
tax, you can live without!
Br,
seb
well, i think what you are pointing out is what allready is the problem with "democracy". people have strong opinions, but rarely know enough, to support them. in europe we have for each country this yes/no to the european-union-membership question, that i think is a perfect example. i am not shure that anyone, can tell the full consequence of yes, or no! but regardless of that fact, NOBODY in media, or at lunch ever recognize this fact. it is more a question of "culture" (lunch), and "interest(s)" (politics). this is democracy in a nutshell.. let a bunch of people deside, on something they havent given a second thought, or ever read even one single article about (and if they have read a single article about it, you can bet they know what they talk about!). :)