Sure you can make up some weird story that has nothing to do with the actual photographs (it is clear to anyone with any sense of perspective that the gun is not pointed at anyone in the photo) that makes the original more anti-military. But the fact is he digitally altered the original photo to make it appear more dramatic, that is to make it appear the BRITISH (not American, it is obvious that you did not read the article) soldier is reacting aggressively to an Iraqi citizen approaching him.
When used in CAN-SPAM it is part of an acronym thought up by Congress, thus there it must be in all caps.
Sure you can make up some weird story that has nothing to do with the actual photographs (it is clear to anyone with any sense of perspective that the gun is not pointed at anyone in the photo) that makes the original more anti-military. But the fact is he digitally altered the original photo to make it appear more dramatic, that is to make it appear the BRITISH (not American, it is obvious that you did not read the article) soldier is reacting aggressively to an Iraqi citizen approaching him.