Thanks for pointing this out to me. I had noticed his turn of the words, "It's almost as if a Grand Designer had it all figured out.", which had reminded me of the up and coming "Intelligent Design" theory of creationism to be taught is school as a competing "scientific" theory to Evolution. In describing his agenda, you've explained that, to some degree. I am much supported in my personal stance by the Scientific American article on the "Multiverse". Paul Davies article seemed somewhat dismissive, and without logic to support that dismissal.
Thanks again for the insight!
-caleb
Slashdot Mirror
Thanks for pointing this out to me. I had noticed his turn of the words, "It's almost as if a Grand Designer had it all figured out.", which had reminded me of the up and coming "Intelligent Design" theory of creationism to be taught is school as a competing "scientific" theory to Evolution. In describing his agenda, you've explained that, to some degree. I am much supported in my personal stance by the Scientific American article on the "Multiverse". Paul Davies article seemed somewhat dismissive, and without logic to support that dismissal. Thanks again for the insight! -caleb