The article is long on President's salary breakdown's, but short on CEO data. Follow the links and see that the "CEO" data was from a very selective list. From the study:
"...This year’s study examined the compensation practices at 3,946 mid to large sized U.S. based charities that de-pend on support from the public...."
I am not certain this is even a fair comparison. Apples & oranges?
Sharing a cake - what a poor analogy.
The path to mediocrity is guaranteed by spending more of a precious resource on those who are the furthest behind.
Resources distributed equally across all gives each an equal chance to achieve to the best of their abilities.
Slashdot Mirror
The article is long on President's salary breakdown's, but short on CEO data. Follow the links and see that the "CEO" data was from a very selective list. From the study: "...This year’s study examined the compensation practices at 3,946 mid to large sized U.S. based charities that de-pend on support from the public...." I am not certain this is even a fair comparison. Apples & oranges?
I used to look here (http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1738.txt) for this kind of thing...
Sharing a cake - what a poor analogy. The path to mediocrity is guaranteed by spending more of a precious resource on those who are the furthest behind. Resources distributed equally across all gives each an equal chance to achieve to the best of their abilities.