Observations are not reproduced, analysis is and that is the easiest part of publishing. You really don't understand this but are stuck on arguing a false point. Read more.
You don't seem to understand the difference between science with designed experiment and science through observational study. In ecology and most other life sciences as well as geology and climatology the observational study is in fact the only way to validate results. Read de Vaus "Survey's in Social Science" - in particular chapter 2 interaction of theory and research where "The development of good explanations involves two related processes: theory construction and theory testing. These two processes are not alternative ways of arriving at good theories but represent two stages with different starting points." This is the point where observational research is science because observations are made, connections theorized, and then connections are compared to the expected results based on the model. The final step is modification of the model to better explain the data. This is the final step of theory testing that loops back to the start, and the entire cycle is repeated and documented. That documentation is what gets published and reviewed by other trained scientists, and it is when they agree with the collection and interpretation that it is called "consensus".
You're confusing the interpretations resulting from two different environmental pollutants. Particulates in the upper atmosphere directly block sunlight and reduce temperatures, as well as the decades long threat of global nuclear war inducing nuclear winter. CO2 is a greenhouse gas absorbing heat and reflecting it back to the surface raising temperatures. For some time both effects were active. Particulates are now under more control, and the true trend increase in global average temperatures is certain. Amounts vary by model but the validity of the model foundation is solid. Humans burning fossil fuels for energy are releasing geologically stored carbon at a faster rate than it can be reabsorbed by the environment, and that is producing more free CO2 in the atmosphere exacerbating the green house effect. Kids often get these things confused so it isn't your fault.
Somebody needs to go back and grab up that damn Sports Almanac, or at least burn it before Trump finds it.
Or, maybe we shot/sabotaged the time traveler meant to protect us from this future.
Unless we ARE the fucked up alternate universe doomed to WW3, and our future is the one to fix the past.
The problem is the overall pattern. That type isn't acceptable as headline for a news outlet anywhere in the world that lives in the daylight. AppNexus has active policy for diversity so it is not only not in their interest to tolerate it, it damages their brand to tolerate it.
Look at the BBC article for several examples. Human testing means there isn't a log, it was a judgement call to uphold the value of their firm for their actual customers.
In deceptive practice wikipedia "cites" a reprinted article from 1960, ignoring the legal development and definition by limited application and overwhelming successful prosecutions since. Overview meaning is that the rights of those targeted are worth more as they are the innocent party, the ones acting to incite violence are the ones committed crimes.
You are a fucking idiot, read all of it you god damn retard. The presentation in the opening paragraphs dismisses the historical foundation and necessity for the law.
The principle of free speech doesn't apply to a company enforcing the terms of service for distributing their customer's ads for display. There are such things as morals, and there are such things as laws against hate speech - see Volksverhetzung.
You are a fucking idiot kid, you're not even a neo-nazi you're a shit-stain the underwear of the man who lit your decaying leader's body on fire after he shot himself.
Life is not a fucking debate, I'm bluntly telling you that you are mentally retarded for not understanding this situation. It doesn't take a commercial law expert to understand TOS and that service stops when there is any violation.
So... you're trying to say your ~feelings~ get hurt by the use of language, while you disclaim the capacity for harm from the speech and action of others especially provocateurs who instigate violence against targeted groups?
Slashdot Mirror
Observations are not reproduced, analysis is and that is the easiest part of publishing. You really don't understand this but are stuck on arguing a false point. Read more.
You don't seem to understand the difference between science with designed experiment and science through observational study. In ecology and most other life sciences as well as geology and climatology the observational study is in fact the only way to validate results. Read de Vaus "Survey's in Social Science" - in particular chapter 2 interaction of theory and research where "The development of good explanations involves two related processes: theory construction and theory testing. These two processes are not alternative ways of arriving at good theories but represent two stages with different starting points." This is the point where observational research is science because observations are made, connections theorized, and then connections are compared to the expected results based on the model. The final step is modification of the model to better explain the data. This is the final step of theory testing that loops back to the start, and the entire cycle is repeated and documented. That documentation is what gets published and reviewed by other trained scientists, and it is when they agree with the collection and interpretation that it is called "consensus".
You're confusing the interpretations resulting from two different environmental pollutants. Particulates in the upper atmosphere directly block sunlight and reduce temperatures, as well as the decades long threat of global nuclear war inducing nuclear winter. CO2 is a greenhouse gas absorbing heat and reflecting it back to the surface raising temperatures. For some time both effects were active. Particulates are now under more control, and the true trend increase in global average temperatures is certain. Amounts vary by model but the validity of the model foundation is solid. Humans burning fossil fuels for energy are releasing geologically stored carbon at a faster rate than it can be reabsorbed by the environment, and that is producing more free CO2 in the atmosphere exacerbating the green house effect. Kids often get these things confused so it isn't your fault.
Somebody needs to go back and grab up that damn Sports Almanac, or at least burn it before Trump finds it. Or, maybe we shot/sabotaged the time traveler meant to protect us from this future. Unless we ARE the fucked up alternate universe doomed to WW3, and our future is the one to fix the past.
You need to learn about human dignity because it is the core of German law and the foundation for the valid definition of hate speech.
You're a fucking idiot, seriously.
The problem is the overall pattern. That type isn't acceptable as headline for a news outlet anywhere in the world that lives in the daylight. AppNexus has active policy for diversity so it is not only not in their interest to tolerate it, it damages their brand to tolerate it.
You are a fucking idiot. In Germany it is normal with conscription.
Look at the BBC article for several examples. Human testing means there isn't a log, it was a judgement call to uphold the value of their firm for their actual customers.
Go to hell you ignorant son of a bitch.
You are retarded. Either a kid or a paid idiot. Either way you're a failure in life.
In deceptive practice wikipedia "cites" a reprinted article from 1960, ignoring the legal development and definition by limited application and overwhelming successful prosecutions since. Overview meaning is that the rights of those targeted are worth more as they are the innocent party, the ones acting to incite violence are the ones committed crimes.
You are a fucking idiot, read all of it you god damn retard. The presentation in the opening paragraphs dismisses the historical foundation and necessity for the law.
Sure. I have actual military training faggot, so you're going to die if we fight.
I hope your mother loves you. She is the only one who will. Hitler is burning in hell and you can join him anytime you like.
The principle of free speech doesn't apply to a company enforcing the terms of service for distributing their customer's ads for display. There are such things as morals, and there are such things as laws against hate speech - see Volksverhetzung.
No, Trump's scheme is to trash the USA as a whole as fuel for his new line of swastika embroidered undergarments.
You are a stupid fucking idiot. Got outside. Learn something. Try school. You fucking need it!
You are a fucking idiot kid, you're not even a neo-nazi you're a shit-stain the underwear of the man who lit your decaying leader's body on fire after he shot himself.
Fuck off you ignorant son of a bitch. Another poster identified your rants as those belonging to a kids website. Go back and play there!
No, but the legal challenge is an example of an early enforcement of TOS policy.
Perfect, this makes the grand coalition a fruit salad.
Life is not a fucking debate, I'm bluntly telling you that you are mentally retarded for not understanding this situation. It doesn't take a commercial law expert to understand TOS and that service stops when there is any violation.
Read the BBC article. It has several.
So... you're trying to say your ~feelings~ get hurt by the use of language, while you disclaim the capacity for harm from the speech and action of others especially provocateurs who instigate violence against targeted groups?