Nuclear power nationalization (France) allows controlled enrichment and reprocessing of direct fuel-waste for reuse. What remains has a minor storage requirement.
The most surprising and disappointing aspect of Trump is his allegiance to Russia over the USA. I'm daily amazed that he not only got away with it but bragged about it routinely.
Notice the doubling in nuclear generation capacity, that is supplemental to the previous charts on non-nuclear renewal energy production. China is the dominant power now, not the USA. China is building more energy production than any other country, and is actively avoiding coal and fossil fuel sources due to pollution.
Not really significant, because China's objective and energy policy is directed at multiple nuclear technologies from not included in those charts and is actively building reactors while researching continued advancements.
Coal isn't the cheapest fuel and has multiple logistical challenges renewable generation avoids. Nuclear is profitably run by French state (85% ownership), and is increasing in Finland. Germany is increasingly involved in Energy trade due to its central position in Europe, so the eventually outcome may be 100% renewable which work for industry - Porsche has a solar-powered factory in Berlin-Adlershof.
You need to learn more about economics, especially spatial economics and the impact of technological change. That is far beyond your primary school curriculum.
Coal is obsolete due to technological change and is a vastly inferior good. Look it up. Claiming conspiracy as alternate explanation is putting your head in the sand.
Variety is entirely possible without using coal. Finland uses relatively little coal, and even when you consider peat burning equivalent it has a minor share in energy production.
Heavy industry like manufacturing and mining can't operate when prices for products are too low. In that situation the LAC = price so there is no profit.
Where is the official statement of his energy policy making the claims you've attributed to it? Trump apologists make up the most reasonable explanations for the ranting of der Führer against the Jews...er... Mexicans, and vilify criticism worse than the official Italian censorship and control by Ordine dei giornalisti.
You'll kill yourselves with pollution then, and when you are dying the rest of us must come save you for humanitarian reasons. USA is the new African continent.
Except they are not aiming for a full recount. This targeted recount is to investigate the discrepancy between paper and electronic results and identify sources of fraud. This is about process improvement itself.
Also since you demand explicit statements, read this, linked from the other article and using even more explicit statements about the fire in the car and from the battery pieces as distinct, and preventing responders action.
The fact that you characterize a person not based on their decisions but on your impressions of them shows that you have no awareness of your personal bias. Your training to not think needs to be undone. I recommend education.
Nuclear power nationalization (France) allows controlled enrichment and reprocessing of direct fuel-waste for reuse. What remains has a minor storage requirement.
The most surprising and disappointing aspect of Trump is his allegiance to Russia over the USA. I'm daily amazed that he not only got away with it but bragged about it routinely.
Notice the doubling in nuclear generation capacity, that is supplemental to the previous charts on non-nuclear renewal energy production. China is the dominant power now, not the USA. China is building more energy production than any other country, and is actively avoiding coal and fossil fuel sources due to pollution.
Read!
Not really significant, because China's objective and energy policy is directed at multiple nuclear technologies from not included in those charts and is actively building reactors while researching continued advancements.
You need to fucking learn about time series analysis. Data must be stationary to apply probability models to the error. Go learn something idiot.
Also read this.
You're still wrong about everything that you claimed.
China has more renewable generation than any other country, and is expanding it faster than any other country.
Compound lies. There is nothing to respond to because nothing you wrote is accurate. Go back to school. You need it.
Coal isn't the cheapest fuel and has multiple logistical challenges renewable generation avoids. Nuclear is profitably run by French state (85% ownership), and is increasing in Finland. Germany is increasingly involved in Energy trade due to its central position in Europe, so the eventually outcome may be 100% renewable which work for industry - Porsche has a solar-powered factory in Berlin-Adlershof.
Now and since before there was a USA.
You need to learn more about economics, especially spatial economics and the impact of technological change. That is far beyond your primary school curriculum.
Coal is obsolete due to technological change and is a vastly inferior good. Look it up. Claiming conspiracy as alternate explanation is putting your head in the sand.
Where is Trump's official energy policy statement? You can't just make shit up because it makes him sound good. Where is the implementation plan?
Variety is entirely possible without using coal. Finland uses relatively little coal, and even when you consider peat burning equivalent it has a minor share in energy production.
Heavy industry like manufacturing and mining can't operate when prices for products are too low. In that situation the LAC = price so there is no profit.
Where is the official statement of his energy policy making the claims you've attributed to it? Trump apologists make up the most reasonable explanations for the ranting of der Führer against the Jews ...er... Mexicans, and vilify criticism worse than the official Italian censorship and control by Ordine dei giornalisti.
You'll kill yourselves with pollution then, and when you are dying the rest of us must come save you for humanitarian reasons. USA is the new African continent.
Except they are not aiming for a full recount. This targeted recount is to investigate the discrepancy between paper and electronic results and identify sources of fraud. This is about process improvement itself.
So now after 3 articles, 2 of which explicitly state that there was a unique and larger fire in the car, you refuse to acknowledge it? Fuck off!
Also since you demand explicit statements, read this, linked from the other article and using even more explicit statements about the fire in the car and from the battery pieces as distinct, and preventing responders action.
It was obvious. Read this.
The fact that you characterize a person not based on their decisions but on your impressions of them shows that you have no awareness of your personal bias. Your training to not think needs to be undone. I recommend education.
Perhaps this is clearer for your to understand.