Slashdot Mirror


User: ekilfeather

ekilfeather's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
4
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 4

  1. Re:This is not enough on Photoshop CS Adds Banknote Image Detection, Blocking? · · Score: 1

    Found this oldish article which seems to describe the same currency 'protection' in colour copiers; which I presume is implemented in firmware.

  2. Re:Don't you get protections with a licensed produ on Fight Woodworking Piracy: Add EULA Restrictions · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Actually I went and looked at the manufacturer's " User Manual " and at the back there is a form to get a replacement jig if you do break it. It uses a hilarious mixure of boy scout honour system and legalise to ensure that the woodworker isn't breaking the EULA and has actually broken the jig. I don't know if this is an attempt to satisfy the oxymoronic (or should that just be moronic?) licencing agreement or is indicative of Mr. Stots' largesse.

  3. Re:Overkill on AMD Athlon XP 3200+ Released · · Score: 1

    >I honestly don't see why someone would need a three Gigahertz processor to run today's popular software.
    >... like VisiCalc back in '79

    Dammit he's right Doom 4 will NEVER be as popular as VisiCalc

  4. Re:Not Pro-Spam, but.... on Spamhaus Responds To Spammers' Lawsuit · · Score: 1

    > So, spammers, you're a pain in the ass.
    > Blackhole list people, you're just as bad.
    > People who use blackhole lists to *BLOCK* (not tag) spam, you're the worst.
    > MailScanner users, and other people who only tag suspicious messages as "SPAM", you're the only ones acting responsibly.

    Right Spammers are a pain in the ass. However to uncritically lump blackhole maintainers into similar categories is frankly ridiculous. Crucially many of these people are volunteers giving their skills and services to the community. After all the Spamhaus project issues an "advisory" and leaves it to mail admins to act as you put it "responsibly" guided by that advice. In the case of open relay lists I think it is entirely appropriate to block mail (albeit on a host by host and not network basis) as it is one of the few ways to tighten up lax relay protection.