Why is SCO charging so much for the right to use SCO IP in Linux when most of the code in the Linux distribution is not SCO IP?
SCO has invested hundreds of millions in the development of UNIX and is therefore entitled to a reasonable return on its investment. SCO believes that major portions of the 2.4 and later versions of the Linux kernel are unauthorized derivative works of SCO UNIX IP.
I think this is all just a bunch of crap. I have no clue what they are thinking....
I bought my 15 gig iPod Friday morning to make sure I could secure one, and then picked it up at 6pm. I have not had an issue with this 'popping' Audio is crystal clear and the iTunes music store rocks!
Slashdot Mirror
Copied right from their Site....
Why is SCO charging so much for the right to use SCO IP in Linux when most of the code in the Linux distribution is not SCO IP?
SCO has invested hundreds of millions in the development of UNIX and is therefore entitled to a reasonable return on its investment. SCO believes that major portions of the 2.4 and later versions of the Linux kernel are unauthorized derivative works of SCO UNIX IP.
I think this is all just a bunch of crap. I have no clue what they are thinking....
I bought my 15 gig iPod Friday morning to make sure I could secure one, and then picked it up at 6pm. I have not had an issue with this 'popping' Audio is crystal clear and the iTunes music store rocks!