I found the article well written but I would prefer a more rigid solution than what the author suggests:
I think a better idea, than to make Microsoft publish their "Office" file formats 6 months in advance, would be to make them reviewed, discussed, specified and published through a standardization body (Subcommittee of ISO, IEEE, ect...).
I found the article well written but I would prefer a more rigid solution than what the author suggests:
I think a better idea, than to make Microsoft publish their "Office" file formats 6 months in advance, would be to make them reviewed, discussed, specified and published through a standardization body (Subcommittee of ISO, IEEE, ect...).