It's all a conspiracy by large computer manufacturers to be able to dazzle and impress you with large numbers and obscure illogical alien like acronyms in order to sell you more products that will aid you and your family throughout the technological world of today, and tomorrow!
It's backed by HP, Compaq, SCO, MS and aliens that are in league with the US Government so that they can obtain their resolve of using human beings as batteries for their new amusement park located on the inside of our moon.
It's lucky I have my tinfoil hat and my rubber boots.
I wish they would come around to my apartment and *enforce* this curfew on me, personally.
Games should have a playing limit; If you play for more than 24 hours, it enforces you to shower, shave and eat something. You would have to present fresh evidence that these tasks have been done before unlocking the next level.
IMHO he's right, although I don't think NS 4.5, was the cut off point for such innovation. What he's talking about is large and dramatic innovation, not add-ons and great expansions (like Tab's, Gestures etc).
But this isn't necessary a bad thing, everyone who uses the net is currently used to using a web browser and its heuristically defined layout, back, forward, reload, home and stop. It doesn't really need (currently) to be changed, the same applies to the controls of a car, the way a book works or even mobile phone interfaces. It works this way, billions of people use it such and changing it would have to be for dramatic purposes.
It doesn't stop us refining it though (again, Tabs, Gestures), just like a car (ABS, Sat Nav, Power Steering etc).
I think Microsoft use the term innovation in a rather (semantically) different manner to everyone else. I don't mean to bash MS because that's been done to death, but it would seem that they use innovation to mean something along the lines of:
Take existing ideas, streamline them, dumb them down and support them to the masses.
Its rare that you see something new come from MS, although I'm sure it must of happened a couple of times (clippy anyone?).
This isn't necessary a bad thing, but their not unique in doing such. They innovate by taking known idea's, and giving them to everyone.
Of course this is how most things are done, it's just that MS have the audience to do it rather more dramatically than anyone else. Unfortunately that also means that the majority of the audience aren't CS graduates etc. And the innovation seems such that it's real innovation. Which is a shame.
You have to admire his persistence with the GNU/label, but I would have to disagree with one of the statements:
"Linux itself is no longer essential"
Which is just egotistical masturbation, the very nature of OSS/FS at this moment in time is focused around Linux almost exclusively in terms of press and business marketing, GNU/hurd or anything else right now could in no way compete with anything Linux has achieved, in terms of market share, popularity and rate of growth.
Not that I don't appreciate what GNU has done, and will continue to-do, it's just that Linux is essential to the community, and OSS in general, hence the amount of heated debate.
Slashdot Mirror
It's all a conspiracy by large computer manufacturers to be able to dazzle and impress you with large numbers and obscure illogical alien like acronyms in order to sell you more products that will aid you and your family throughout the technological world of today, and tomorrow!
It's backed by HP, Compaq, SCO, MS and aliens that are in league with the US Government so that they can obtain their resolve of using human beings as batteries for their new amusement park located on the inside of our moon.
It's lucky I have my tinfoil hat and my rubber boots.
I wish they would come around to my apartment and *enforce* this curfew on me, personally.
Games should have a playing limit; If you play for more than 24 hours, it enforces you to shower, shave and eat something. You would have to present fresh evidence that these tasks have been done before unlocking the next level.
It would be for my own good :/
IMHO he's right, although I don't think NS 4.5, was the cut off point for such innovation. What he's talking about is large and dramatic innovation, not add-ons and great expansions (like Tab's, Gestures etc).
But this isn't necessary a bad thing, everyone who uses the net is currently used to using a web browser and its heuristically defined layout, back, forward, reload, home and stop. It doesn't really need (currently) to be changed, the same applies to the controls of a car, the way a book works or even mobile phone interfaces. It works this way, billions of people use it such and changing it would have to be for dramatic purposes.
It doesn't stop us refining it though (again, Tabs, Gestures), just like a car (ABS, Sat Nav, Power Steering etc).
I think Microsoft use the term innovation in a rather (semantically) different manner to everyone else. I don't mean to bash MS because that's been done to death, but it would seem that they use innovation to mean something along the lines of: Take existing ideas, streamline them, dumb them down and support them to the masses. Its rare that you see something new come from MS, although I'm sure it must of happened a couple of times (clippy anyone?). This isn't necessary a bad thing, but their not unique in doing such. They innovate by taking known idea's, and giving them to everyone. Of course this is how most things are done, it's just that MS have the audience to do it rather more dramatically than anyone else. Unfortunately that also means that the majority of the audience aren't CS graduates etc. And the innovation seems such that it's real innovation. Which is a shame.
You have to admire his persistence with the GNU/label, but I would have to disagree with one of the statements:
"Linux itself is no longer essential"
Which is just egotistical masturbation, the very nature of OSS/FS at this moment in time is focused around Linux almost exclusively in terms of press and business marketing, GNU/hurd or anything else right now could in no way compete with anything Linux has achieved, in terms of market share, popularity and rate of growth.
Not that I don't appreciate what GNU has done, and will continue to-do, it's just that Linux is essential to the community, and OSS in general, hence the amount of heated debate.