You do know it's against the law in most states to stop your car on the highway except to avoid an accident or when required to do so by a police officer.
Then there are millions of criminals out on the road at least twice every weekday in every major city everywhere....
I found that interesting, and read through more of his work. He was only wrong in polflucht, as the mechanism wasn't strong enough. However, he was right on almost every other aspect, and the science community railed against their boat being rocked by the truth. This happened to Einstein and every other scientist that makes a truly groundbreaking discovery that upends a lot of lifework, as only a few can write off their life's work as a mistake and move on.
Considering that 4K monitors still aren't common, you've still got at least another year to go.
There's plenty of 4K "monitors" available, but 4K HDR quality monitors are just starting to show up as of last month. Sony has one but they don't make their own panels anyways so I'll get better quality from someone that doesn't actively hate their customers.
Two choices, cancel the layoff or go down in flames.
If I am reading you correctly I think that this is probably the time. Technologists don't need to picket....It should only take about 12 days of downtime for any business to be completely on it's knees and willing to negotiate with those who have worked hard to make that business function. 14 days and they will be offering pay rises for you to stay.
You think that would be the way it works. It doesn't. Watching the CEOs face as they realized they rolled the wrong dice as you walk out the door?... definitely worth the few weeks severance that might have been offered after training the replacements.
you'll note that "cool" and "quiet" were 2 requirements at 4K HDR. I doubt the 260x will meet either of those requirements running near 80C under full load. 4K isn't exactly going to be a low load situation. I'd even prefer a fanless GPU if possible.
I rip all my discs, and still occasionally, when the artist actually puts together a complete disc, buy one. Why? Because the quality is far better than any streaming service. Oh, and *owning* my music is far better than an ongoing payment system leaching money from your wallet every month.
What did you do with them? Use them as coasters? Play frisbee with them? I have disks dating back to at least 1986 that still play fine. One suffered disk rot and likely won't rip anymore (took quite a long time and a few attempts to fully rip a quality rip years ago), and a couple that have scratches when loaned but still play.
Regarding Calendar, Google has done a lot of work to make their calendaring solution incompatible with iCal standards. Then again, so has MS, Apple, and probably everyone else.
It's not an edge case wrt to music, given the large large catalog of remixes and mashups people have locally, along with multiple releases over time of any popular song or even bootleg recordings. In fact, for large collections, I'd say the edge case would be the simple matches that Apple Music appears to have done, as any large collection is bound to have oddities in it.
or that people have finally understood that pseudo-random code is deterministic and fail to see how to address it.
or, perhaps, I could have added a time stamp seed in the original post. I still would have had some of the remaining posts to address the time aspects, never mind how to remove all aspects of deterministic behavior, even within the generation of random numbers. Making non-deterministic randoms is relatively trivial in multi-threaded multi-cored systems under load, it just performs poorly.
Read the rest of the posts. We already covered it. For all intents and purposes, we can create effectively random input. Gaming it with special conditions to make it not random is like saying we'll only watch the coin flip from a determined point in a known flip sequence retroactively.
but there is effectively a unique seed for the domain in question. Time is ever increasing, and by using time as a seed, Math.random() is effectively for the purposes being discussed here random as it should not be repeatable on a single machine running a single thread utilizing Math.random(). Can the results be duplicated? Of course. Can we determine what the list of numbers will be? Certainly. Can we state what they will be without knowing the seed? The chances are exceedingly small. Should we use some permutation of the time, such as reversing the digits and use them as the initial half, or using a second source and slip it into the first, while increasing the potential for duplicate seeds, the ability to determine the sequence will be vanishingly small so as to make winning the lottery a certainty by comparison. There are all sorts of ways to make the pseudo random code less deterministic to the point that for all intents and purposes it is random enough as to be indistinguishable from something truly random, if anything like that exists.
Does it? If I seed it with time (seconds, ms, ns or permutations) I can be pretty sure that 2 runs will never return the same values, likely with more than 99.999% guarantees.
That is the only option, and should be done, with no exclusions. Imports get taxed at least twice. Solves numerous issues and seriously streamlines all tax codes.
Slashdot Mirror
You do know it's against the law in most states to stop your car on the highway except to avoid an accident or when required to do so by a police officer.
Then there are millions of criminals out on the road at least twice every weekday in every major city everywhere....
You know, that little electrostatic bag really has multiple good uses.
He didn't find a city he found a corn field. Hardly boat rocking.
Alfred Wegener found a corn field? I'm interested, that wasn't in the stuff I read!
I found that interesting, and read through more of his work. He was only wrong in polflucht, as the mechanism wasn't strong enough. However, he was right on almost every other aspect, and the science community railed against their boat being rocked by the truth. This happened to Einstein and every other scientist that makes a truly groundbreaking discovery that upends a lot of lifework, as only a few can write off their life's work as a mistake and move on.
Considering that 4K monitors still aren't common, you've still got at least another year to go.
There's plenty of 4K "monitors" available, but 4K HDR quality monitors are just starting to show up as of last month. Sony has one but they don't make their own panels anyways so I'll get better quality from someone that doesn't actively hate their customers.
Two choices, cancel the layoff or go down in flames.
If I am reading you correctly I think that this is probably the time. Technologists don't need to picket. ...It should only take about 12 days of downtime for any business to be completely on it's knees and willing to negotiate with those who have worked hard to make that business function. 14 days and they will be offering pay rises for you to stay.
You think that would be the way it works. It doesn't. Watching the CEOs face as they realized they rolled the wrong dice as you walk out the door?... definitely worth the few weeks severance that might have been offered after training the replacements.
you'll note that "cool" and "quiet" were 2 requirements at 4K HDR. I doubt the 260x will meet either of those requirements running near 80C under full load. 4K isn't exactly going to be a low load situation. I'd even prefer a fanless GPU if possible.
I'd just like a low power quiet 4K HDR card for regular work at a $200 price point. :)
I rip all my discs, and still occasionally, when the artist actually puts together a complete disc, buy one. Why? Because the quality is far better than any streaming service. Oh, and *owning* my music is far better than an ongoing payment system leaching money from your wallet every month.
besides, streaming limits you to whatever "they" want you to hear. I likely want to hear something else.
None of my old CDs work anymore.
What did you do with them? Use them as coasters? Play frisbee with them? I have disks dating back to at least 1986 that still play fine. One suffered disk rot and likely won't rip anymore (took quite a long time and a few attempts to fully rip a quality rip years ago), and a couple that have scratches when loaned but still play.
Regarding Calendar, Google has done a lot of work to make their calendaring solution incompatible with iCal standards. Then again, so has MS, Apple, and probably everyone else.
Java is written in... wait for it.... Java.
The JVM, OTOH.....
iTunes allows for keeping your music as is or moving it to the Library. So there are at least 2 workflows....
Or Google (mail & calendaring) or any other large software company, for that matter.
It's not theft if you agree to give something away. Always always keep backups of your stuff.
It's not an edge case wrt to music, given the large large catalog of remixes and mashups people have locally, along with multiple releases over time of any popular song or even bootleg recordings. In fact, for large collections, I'd say the edge case would be the simple matches that Apple Music appears to have done, as any large collection is bound to have oddities in it.
or that people have finally understood that pseudo-random code is deterministic and fail to see how to address it.
or, perhaps, I could have added a time stamp seed in the original post. I still would have had some of the remaining posts to address the time aspects, never mind how to remove all aspects of deterministic behavior, even within the generation of random numbers. Making non-deterministic randoms is relatively trivial in multi-threaded multi-cored systems under load, it just performs poorly.
Read the rest of the posts. We already covered it. For all intents and purposes, we can create effectively random input. Gaming it with special conditions to make it not random is like saying we'll only watch the coin flip from a determined point in a known flip sequence retroactively.
Evince version 3.18.2 and Okular: 0.24.2 [...] I was able to fill the forms
not only to fill in the form but also submit the form through the PDF reader. I wonder whether there's a way to test submission.
Sure - print and mail.
but there is effectively a unique seed for the domain in question. Time is ever increasing, and by using time as a seed, Math.random() is effectively for the purposes being discussed here random as it should not be repeatable on a single machine running a single thread utilizing Math.random(). Can the results be duplicated? Of course. Can we determine what the list of numbers will be? Certainly. Can we state what they will be without knowing the seed? The chances are exceedingly small. Should we use some permutation of the time, such as reversing the digits and use them as the initial half, or using a second source and slip it into the first, while increasing the potential for duplicate seeds, the ability to determine the sequence will be vanishingly small so as to make winning the lottery a certainty by comparison. There are all sorts of ways to make the pseudo random code less deterministic to the point that for all intents and purposes it is random enough as to be indistinguishable from something truly random, if anything like that exists.
That was kind of the point - by choosing a potentially random seed (effectively) the net result is not deterministic.
Does it? If I seed it with time (seconds, ms, ns or permutations) I can be pretty sure that 2 runs will never return the same values, likely with more than 99.999% guarantees.
Math.random()
or the fed's pass a national sales tax
That is the only option, and should be done, with no exclusions. Imports get taxed at least twice. Solves numerous issues and seriously streamlines all tax codes.