Opera has been a leader in many key browser innovations, why not patent protect them and start charging the companies who add them them to their product.
Its about time Opera got its due credit and got paid for it!
Its about time, but a switch to AMD makes more sense. Tables have turned indeed.
AMD CPUs are more expensive faster/better.
Intel has reduced prices, performance lacks....and now this. BTW I recently bought a P4 3.2 Ghz Prescott, so I'm on the side of facts, but the facts are obvious aren't they.
How about by investing in TWO lower spec systems rather than one, and CLUSTERING them.
Active-Passive Cluster or Active-Active Cluster
If its a Windows Server (Win2kAS not necassary) environment, Legato's Co-Standby Server software, is pretty reliable, but LEGALLY the cost is the Issue.
The reason I mentioned Co-Standby server is, cause its only wants the OS to be be identical, Win2k Server X2 or Win2kAD X2, unlike Windows Advanced Server where it NEEDS identical OSes & hardware to cluster.
Two systems P4 1.7 Ghz 256 MB RAM (RAID)
Still I'd say if you can do the Active-Passive or even Active-Active Cluster with Linux go for it, might even come in handy for some load balancing.
[Note to Self: Go research on Linux Clustering;-)]
Slashdot Mirror
Opera has been a leader in many key browser innovations, why not patent protect them and start charging the companies who add them them to their product. Its about time Opera got its due credit and got paid for it!
Its about time, but a switch to AMD makes more sense. Tables have turned indeed. AMD CPUs are more expensive faster/better. Intel has reduced prices, performance lacks. ...and now this. BTW I recently bought a P4 3.2 Ghz Prescott, so I'm on the side of facts, but the facts are obvious aren't they.
How about by investing in TWO lower spec systems rather than one, and CLUSTERING them.
;-)]
Active-Passive Cluster
or
Active-Active Cluster
If its a Windows Server (Win2kAS not necassary) environment, Legato's Co-Standby Server software, is pretty reliable, but LEGALLY the cost is the Issue.
The reason I mentioned Co-Standby server is, cause its only wants the OS to be be identical, Win2k Server X2 or Win2kAD X2, unlike Windows Advanced Server where it NEEDS identical OSes & hardware to cluster.
Two systems
P4 1.7 Ghz
256 MB RAM
(RAID)
Still I'd say if you can do the Active-Passive or even Active-Active Cluster with Linux go for it, might even come in handy for some load balancing.
[Note to Self: Go research on Linux Clustering