According to this site http://www.iol.unh.edu/training/fc/fc_tutorial.htm l Fibre, or other places called Fiber, Channels could offer,in theory, a speed of over 4 Gigabit a second. I remember an add in some computer mag offering 2 Gig/s Fibre Hard drives... btw...at these speeds real-time tv-to-mpeg writing could be accomplished with no loss, that is if you could get a card to do some real time encoding.
@home has not done it jobs to the Usenet community and should be punished, why should @home get all of this pity because their users wouldn't have Usenet access. Maybe the users should have thought about how bad @home's spam policy was when they signed up, then they could have expected this and could only blame themselfs. Or they could sue @home for not providing a service they payed for...I would if my ISP got a death sentence( or at least drop my account)
According to this site http://www.iol.unh.edu/training/fc/fc_tutorial.htm l Fibre, or other places called Fiber, Channels could offer,in theory, a speed of over 4 Gigabit a second. I remember an add in some computer mag offering 2 Gig/s Fibre Hard drives... btw...at these speeds real-time tv-to-mpeg writing could be accomplished with no loss, that is if you could get a card to do some real time encoding.
@home has not done it jobs to the Usenet community and should be punished, why should @home get all of this pity because their users wouldn't have Usenet access. Maybe the users should have thought about how bad @home's spam policy was when they signed up, then they could have expected this and could only blame themselfs. Or they could sue @home for not providing a service they payed for...I would if my ISP got a death sentence( or at least drop my account)
"Ignorance is Strength" --1984 *Ajax*