$150,000 for a song??? How do they come up with ridiculous figures like that? I guess some RIAA hotshot's armcandy needs three pairs of new tits and p2p clients are supposed to pay for it. It is disgusting the way judicial system spends their time and taxpayers' money making SOBs richer than the whole world. Meanwhile there are more pressing issues in the country besides RIAAs "holy war on piracy". It is interesting though that the RIAA is hunting regular folks instead of asking themselves a question - how on Earth do screening tapes and other stuff end up on the Internet loooong befor the actual release date? How do they prove they don't have moles at studios who deliberately post movies and music on the Internet, so that the RIAA could sue the pants off the users?
What the hell do they think they are doing? Issuing subpoenas, whining about "losses", meanwhile there are more serious problems to be solved. $150,000 for a song? Damn it, I guess some hotshot's arm-candy desperately needs three pairs of new tits and p2p clients are the ones to pay for it. I can't believe judicial system spends their time and taxpayers' money to make those SOBs richer than the world. It's disgusting the way RIAA is making ISPs release actual names of the users thus violating their privacy. Their primary concern should be how on Earth screening tapes and other stuff end up on the Internet long before the release dates. It's sure as hell easier to try tracking their own moles rather than throwing shit on the fan.
Slashdot Mirror
$150,000 for a song??? How do they come up with ridiculous figures like that? I guess some RIAA hotshot's armcandy needs three pairs of new tits and p2p clients are supposed to pay for it. It is disgusting the way judicial system spends their time and taxpayers' money making SOBs richer than the whole world. Meanwhile there are more pressing issues in the country besides RIAAs "holy war on piracy". It is interesting though that the RIAA is hunting regular folks instead of asking themselves a question - how on Earth do screening tapes and other stuff end up on the Internet loooong befor the actual release date? How do they prove they don't have moles at studios who deliberately post movies and music on the Internet, so that the RIAA could sue the pants off the users?
What the hell do they think they are doing? Issuing subpoenas, whining about "losses", meanwhile there are more serious problems to be solved. $150,000 for a song? Damn it, I guess some hotshot's arm-candy desperately needs three pairs of new tits and p2p clients are the ones to pay for it. I can't believe judicial system spends their time and taxpayers' money to make those SOBs richer than the world. It's disgusting the way RIAA is making ISPs release actual names of the users thus violating their privacy. Their primary concern should be how on Earth screening tapes and other stuff end up on the Internet long before the release dates. It's sure as hell easier to try tracking their own moles rather than throwing shit on the fan.