Not true. First of all Einstein states that nothing can accelerate faster than light. Secondly because of quantum uncertainty, objects can actually briefly accelerate faster than light (at least on a subatomic level)
So, with a sufficient quantity of well placed probes, couldn't a person hypotheticaly send a signal just across the event horizon to another probe which would relay the signal angd amplify it to a third probe (etc.). Then in theory could one not send a signal from the inside of a black hole to the outside universe?
If scientists can cure cancer in rats and fix paralysis in rats then they can probably help them recover from that. Besides, they were going to kill the rats to examine their bodies anyway.
The sun has LOTS of energy not just in the visible spectrum. Presumably this would aid the destruction of tumor cells. If a normal Lightbulb could do that, why would we have lasers?
Slashdot Mirror
Not true. First of all Einstein states that nothing can accelerate faster than light. Secondly because of quantum uncertainty, objects can actually briefly accelerate faster than light (at least on a subatomic level)
So, with a sufficient quantity of well placed probes, couldn't a person hypotheticaly send a signal just across the event horizon to another probe which would relay the signal angd amplify it to a third probe (etc.). Then in theory could one not send a signal from the inside of a black hole to the outside universe?
If scientists can cure cancer in rats and fix paralysis in rats then they can probably help them recover from that. Besides, they were going to kill the rats to examine their bodies anyway.
The sun has LOTS of energy not just in the visible spectrum. Presumably this would aid the destruction of tumor cells. If a normal Lightbulb could do that, why would we have lasers?