I'm not sure if there was a division of labor between the projects - if so, then the parent will suffer.
Right now on android-x86 home page, I see:
2016-10-12: Remix OS for PC version: 3.0.206 is available for download.
2016-08-17: Remix OS for PC - Android M rc2 (version: 3.0.201) on Android-x86 project is available for download.
2016-07-26: Remix OS for PC - Android M Version on Android-x86 project is available for download.
2016-07-06: Remix OS for PC - Latest version built (version: 2.0.402) on Android-x86 project is available for download.
I would not be surprised if Android-x86 releases slowed. They were stuck on KitKat for a LONG time.
...but you will never get a dime from me to remove ads.
I decided to stop buying HTC when they completely refused to unlock the device. I likewise absolutely refuse to run their (poor quality) stock, and we all see the consequences of their OTAs/updates.
Sunshine appears to do quite the business with HTC.
...for the sole reason that it is unlocked and 64-bit capable. It will be supported for a long, long time by the AOSP rerolls.
With the surprising speed that Google has dragged it's phones to the guillotine, LineageOS on the 6p will likely outlast several Pixel models.
At least some Pixels will also die a forced death, since the Verizon model's bootloader is locked. Google would have every reason to similarly lock the entire line at the final update.
Intel is not breaking up Qualcomm's exclusive access to Verizon, Sprint, and U.S. Cellular.
These are CDMA carriers, and they belong to Qualcomm.
Apple started out using the Infineon/Intel modems, and was AT&T only. Even then the WCDMA in GSM that was used by the old Infineon modems accessed FRAND IP owned by Qualcomm. GSM was originally TDMA.
Apple has ignored patents and plundered tech before (Samsung comes to mind - 5,579,239, 6,226,449).
Qualcomm is likely to have sufficient legal standing to prevail where Samsung failed - Qualcomm is a domestic company with stronger patents and a stronger legal department, and not quite so much corporate scandal.
I also hope that Qualcomm wins. An Apple victory limits the market and drives up costs. While Qualcomm has its problems, it helps the market much more than Apple does. Between them, Apple should suffer before Qualcomm.
If you trust the quality and security of MS products and the business practices of the company enough to endorse them by using their products (or if you're too damned oblivious to have put a moment's thought into it, American-style) then you're already using Windows 10 and maybe Edge as well.
There are some coders at Microsoft who are the very best in the business. If Microsoft releases their code for practical applications, why would we discriminate against it merely for the name of the originator?
Before Dave Cutler designed the kernel for Windows NT, he had previously lead the VAX VMS kernel design team. He produces tight and beautiful code, and ignoring any open-source practical contributions from him would be quite foolish.
That said, it's unlikely that Cutler has anything to do with Win10, and it shows.
I have used various versions of the FWTK to isolate test networks. There is an independent version of the code here.
If you (can find and) use the old version, beware of the author's reflections on his code.
As this has long been abandonware, I'd say that all of this code should be running in a chroot() as nobody should you use it. Also note that you'll need the -m32 compiler flag (in addition to many other changes) to get a clean build.
Unlike a greenhouse earth, an icehouse earth has ice sheets present, and these sheets wax and wane throughout times known as glacial periods and interglacial periods. During an icehouse earth, greenhouse gases tend to be less abundant, and temperatures tend to be cooler globally. The Earth is currently in an icehouse stage, as ice sheets are present on both poles and glacial periods have occurred at regular intervals over the past million years.
The above client is a 3rd-party open source wrapper. It will not update itself automatically without asking. It will not suddenly drain your battery dry. It will not access any sensors on your device without your approval. It will not gather your contacts and upload them for recruiting and advertising.
Facebook does all of these things and more. Burn it off your phone with a blowtorch.
I actually traveled the country for Deere & Co., installing SCO Xenix running on 286s in dealerships. Most(/all) of the development was done in RM COBOL.
The hardware was made by Texas Instruments, and the motherboard was in three sections attached by ribbon cables. TI later dumped x86 Xenix and moved to a 68000/nubus (Mac clone?) running their own port of SysV.
I really don't miss any of those machines. HP bought TI's UNIX line and shot it in the head.
In Eldred v. Ashcroft, the court affirmed that Congress is sovereign in settings patent and copyright terms.
If Congress is sovereign in lengthening the term(s), would not Congress be sovereign in setting any terms they choose to zero?
From the wiki: "However, the major argument for the act that carried over into the case was that the Constitution specified that Congress only needed to set time limits for copyright, the length of which was left to their discretion."
Assuming that the House, Senate, and the President agree to make an example of a particularly badly-behaved corporation, are they able to place some or all of the effected patents into the public domain?
Before you go any further with your criticism of SMB, you might want to disable NFSv4 functionality in any Linux kernels that you are running, as this version was heavily influenced by developments in SMB.
Theo de Raadt has particularly harsh things to say about the v4 protocol, but it is in wide use and it solves a number of problems.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wik...
Previous models suggested that massive collisions somehow ejected a large amount of Jupiter's core, leaving it undersized compared to Saturn. Those models are likely getting some updates with this new data.
https://www.newscientist.com/a...http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sci...
Slashdot Mirror
I'm not sure if there was a division of labor between the projects - if so, then the parent will suffer.
Right now on android-x86 home page, I see:
I would not be surprised if Android-x86 releases slowed. They were stuck on KitKat for a LONG time.
I haven't tried PhoenixOS yet. They've brought out Android 7 Nougat since I last browsed their site.
I wonder what will rise from the ashes of Remix?
...but you will never get a dime from me to remove ads.
I decided to stop buying HTC when they completely refused to unlock the device. I likewise absolutely refuse to run their (poor quality) stock, and we all see the consequences of their OTAs/updates.
Sunshine appears to do quite the business with HTC.
We have known this has been happening for over a year.
Still, this is approved, accepted and endorsed behavior, while AdNauseam is not.
Do no evil - not.
...for the sole reason that it is unlocked and 64-bit capable. It will be supported for a long, long time by the AOSP rerolls.
With the surprising speed that Google has dragged it's phones to the guillotine, LineageOS on the 6p will likely outlast several Pixel models.
At least some Pixels will also die a forced death, since the Verizon model's bootloader is locked. Google would have every reason to similarly lock the entire line at the final update.
Intel is not breaking up Qualcomm's exclusive access to Verizon, Sprint, and U.S. Cellular.
These are CDMA carriers, and they belong to Qualcomm.
Apple started out using the Infineon/Intel modems, and was AT&T only. Even then the WCDMA in GSM that was used by the old Infineon modems accessed FRAND IP owned by Qualcomm. GSM was originally TDMA.
Apple has ignored patents and plundered tech before (Samsung comes to mind - 5,579,239, 6,226,449).
Qualcomm is likely to have sufficient legal standing to prevail where Samsung failed - Qualcomm is a domestic company with stronger patents and a stronger legal department, and not quite so much corporate scandal.
I also hope that Qualcomm wins. An Apple victory limits the market and drives up costs. While Qualcomm has its problems, it helps the market much more than Apple does. Between them, Apple should suffer before Qualcomm.
Apple also has it coming.
The nation simply cannot support a wholesale migration of the U.S. technology sector - the threat is comparatively small.
...if you are a kernel or systems contributor to a major platform.
As I remember, there were compromises in the kernel architecture that were evoked deep "regret" in the commentary.
There are some coders at Microsoft who are the very best in the business. If Microsoft releases their code for practical applications, why would we discriminate against it merely for the name of the originator?
Before Dave Cutler designed the kernel for Windows NT, he had previously lead the VAX VMS kernel design team. He produces tight and beautiful code, and ignoring any open-source practical contributions from him would be quite foolish.
That said, it's unlikely that Cutler has anything to do with Win10, and it shows.
Apple does not allow browsers on that platform that do anything other than wrap Webview.
Tell me why I need Windows 10 again?
http://www.tedunangst.com/flak/post/efficient-music-players-remain-elusive
...is open source Edge.
Microsoft, you must abandon hope that you will regain any market share with a closed source browser locked to Windows 10. It will never, never happen.
When independent ports of Edge emerge on OSX, Ubuntu, Dragonfly, and Haiku, then perhaps there will be hope - and not one day before.
I have used various versions of the FWTK to isolate test networks. There is an independent version of the code here.
If you (can find and) use the old version, beware of the author's reflections on his code.
As this has long been abandonware, I'd say that all of this code should be running in a chroot() as nobody should you use it. Also note that you'll need the -m32 compiler flag (in addition to many other changes) to get a clean build.
As I understand it, this uses the Android system WebView with a few of the privacy controls from Firefox (but without the Gecko rendering engine).
There is already an existing product that does this (and likely offers more features).
KitKat users should be particularly careful with WebView browsers, since their engine (likely) hasn't been updated since XP went out of support.
The question that we should be asking: is the transition point to Greenhouse Earth under 700ppm of CO2? If so, there is likely no stopping it.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greenhouse_and_icehouse_Earth
I have discussed all of this in another place. Microsoft is unambiguous on this issue, and for good reason.
His advice? In no uncertain terms, delete your account immediately.
This is far from a unique opinion.
Here is a handy Facebook client for Android that provides access to Messenger:
F-Droid Face Slim
The above client is a 3rd-party open source wrapper. It will not update itself automatically without asking. It will not suddenly drain your battery dry. It will not access any sensors on your device without your approval. It will not gather your contacts and upload them for recruiting and advertising.
Facebook does all of these things and more. Burn it off your phone with a blowtorch.
I actually traveled the country for Deere & Co., installing SCO Xenix running on 286s in dealerships. Most(/all) of the development was done in RM COBOL.
The hardware was made by Texas Instruments, and the motherboard was in three sections attached by ribbon cables. TI later dumped x86 Xenix and moved to a 68000/nubus (Mac clone?) running their own port of SysV.
I really don't miss any of those machines. HP bought TI's UNIX line and shot it in the head.
A quick google of "The UNIX Programming Environment PDF" shows several available sources. Archive.org has a few other titles.
The AWK Programming Language
The C Programming Language - First Edition (useful for old systems, HP-UX bundled K&R compiler), Second Edition.
Practice of Web Programming (audio), also CBC Spark
DMR final web page mirror
The UNIX Time-Sharing System (C Programming Language alternate text)
Why do you think it could be challenged?
In Eldred v. Ashcroft, the court affirmed that Congress is sovereign in settings patent and copyright terms.
If Congress is sovereign in lengthening the term(s), would not Congress be sovereign in setting any terms they choose to zero?
From the wiki: "However, the major argument for the act that carried over into the case was that the Constitution specified that Congress only needed to set time limits for copyright, the length of which was left to their discretion."
If zero doesn't work, how about 3 months?
Assuming that the House, Senate, and the President agree to make an example of a particularly badly-behaved corporation, are they able to place some or all of the effected patents into the public domain?
Before you go any further with your criticism of SMB, you might want to disable NFSv4 functionality in any Linux kernels that you are running, as this version was heavily influenced by developments in SMB. Theo de Raadt has particularly harsh things to say about the v4 protocol, but it is in wide use and it solves a number of problems. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wik...
Previous models suggested that massive collisions somehow ejected a large amount of Jupiter's core, leaving it undersized compared to Saturn. Those models are likely getting some updates with this new data. https://www.newscientist.com/a... http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sci...