I suspect that Longhorn is less dangerous to your PC than say Mandrakes ability to kill your harddrive or OS X 10.3 ability to wipe your external firewire drive
I worked with Novell. As long as you just wanted file and print services they were ok. If you wanted to run an application, it was a complete waste of time.
As soon as NT 4.0 was in SP2 there was no point in wasting time with Novell.
SUSE is toast. So is Novell.
Linux? Bye Bye.
By June of 2001, according to Google's Zeitgeist, NT had 25% of the market.
http://www.google.com/press/zeitgeist/zeitgeist-ju ne.html
I'm assuming Windows 2000 and NT are lumped together.
In January of 2001, it was 24%.
We use SUS. Its free. It works. All machines on have been fine. The biggest problems were people on holidays. Their machines hadn't got the updates or the newest McAfee DATS.
Slashdot Mirror
Break into Savannah - 1 month Break into GNU - 4 months
I suspect that Longhorn is less dangerous to your PC than say Mandrakes ability to kill your harddrive or OS X 10.3 ability to wipe your external firewire drive
I worked with Novell. As long as you just wanted file and print services they were ok. If you wanted to run an application, it was a complete waste of time. As soon as NT 4.0 was in SP2 there was no point in wasting time with Novell. SUSE is toast. So is Novell. Linux? Bye Bye.
Liar. Windows does NOT and NEVER HAS split threads. Typical Slashdot moron lying about Windows.
By June of 2001, according to Google's Zeitgeist, NT had 25% of the market. http://www.google.com/press/zeitgeist/zeitgeist-ju ne.html
I'm assuming Windows 2000 and NT are lumped together.
In January of 2001, it was 24%.
We use SUS. Its free. It works. All machines on have been fine. The biggest problems were people on holidays. Their machines hadn't got the updates or the newest McAfee DATS.
According to Google zeitgeist, its been 1% for the last three years.