I wrote a book nearly 200 pages long on super-symmetrical umm... things!, you'd be surprized and terrified of what looking into "zero" could bring you. First off, imaginary numbers appear to look like zero. Ummmmm, what's the square root of imaginary? think of that for a start! -if you're interested. --Sonnie
What do you think about a waveform particle accelerating to near the speed of light? It has been proven with atomic clocks that the faster something approaches the speed of light, the slower it's "clock_ticks" go. Could the speed of light just be an appearance of a "zero" in relativity to our own "frequency"?--in which as an object/waveform_particle approaches the speed of light, it's "frequency" decreases?, and that light it'self has no frequency,--it only appears to be having frequency due to it's appearance, and it's actually a result of a relationship between our frequency and the "concentration of energy" deposited into the electromagnetic wave in relativity to us?
I read the story, and when i came across ZERO, it reminded me of a notebook i wrote when i was in 10th grade high school, nearly 200 pages long. I have the book "ZERO". The book sparked my interest in imaginary numbers, but later led my interests into things far beyond what my own brain could handle. first i was curious about the square root of imaginary, and the square root of that, and so on.. until basicaly we're saying Something to the power of zero. i thot it would no longer be a value of any charge, but rather a neutral charge, not positive, not negative, not zero, but neutral. I thot of it to be another Zero, much like zero it'self, but a zero of higher order,. then i thot about an infinity of higher order. Eventually, i almost successfully mapped out the pattern of all symmetry, and i realized there were infinite orders, and infinite sets of those orders,. and there seemed to be possibilities of realities of higher orders and of lower orders, lower orders below that of numbers and charges, or orders lower than dimension(direction) or magnitude, still consisting of value, but not able to be defined by any known algebraic mean. Infinite realities "less real" than our own, and infinite realities "more real" than our own. Yet we are subject to those "lower" realities and to those "higher" realities. But the key to all of it, is within a single singularity, zero!, yet just zero alone already "contains" infinite "tunnels" to far out realities even beyond infinity. Our entire universe can be just a singularity containing infinite possibilities, yet all following simple pattern saying that all equals each other, all is within one point. This brings up a thot i once had, that a blackhole might look like it "dips" into a point where everything is crushed, but that's just from our point of view(ourside the blackhole), but at that singularity of the blackhole actually lies infinite realities. It's like a wormhole to other universes, but yet all equally real to our own also containing blackholes. You might think of the blackholes to be as gateways to either lower or higher sets of realities, and that we ourselves might be contained within one blackhole of a higher reality. I make this sound like we're living in endless Hell. But, this whole idea was born from some math thing i was doing, however, in the end i closed my book and wrote the final conclusion "Anything and Everything is possible, and exists somewhere"--be it just in our minds, which i'm also trying to impress that our minds are just as real as the universe we're in, it's just at a lower or higher order of reality than our own.
Einstein said "Science without religion is blind, but religion without science is blind", sometimes when you try soo hard to find out your depest origins, you might not realize you're just trying to look for God, and God's looking at you right in your face thru the things you look into, but you don't know it. your concious hopes are only to find your origins, not God. and when you see God, it looks like something else to you, so you ignore God... ummmm, where am i trying to go now?, i think i'm lost... God knows....
Just recently we(humans) been able to transport some matter faster than the speed of light, but still not at the speed of light. E=mc^2 works with m = relative mass to you, but if you wanted it to work in reletivity to velocity, it needs to be in the form of the equation: E = m c^2/(1 - v^2/c^2)^(1/2); where m = absolute mass or rest mass; Hence, m' = m/(1 - v^2/c^2)^(1/2), where m = absolute mass, and m' = relative mass to you, and v = velocity of mass relative to you the equation allows matter to travel below or above the speed of light, but not at the speed of light, unless it is light it'self; E=mc2 is not all useless after all, it's useful in opening up some possible "doors" to tachyon physics. what do you think about that?
I wrote a book nearly 200 pages long on super-symmetrical umm... things!, you'd be surprized and terrified of what looking into "zero" could bring you. First off, imaginary numbers appear to look like zero. Ummmmm, what's the square root of imaginary? think of that for a start! -if you're interested. --Sonnie
What do you think about a waveform particle accelerating to near the speed of light? It has been proven with atomic clocks that the faster something approaches the speed of light, the slower it's "clock_ticks" go. Could the speed of light just be an appearance of a "zero" in relativity to our own "frequency"?--in which as an object/waveform_particle approaches the speed of light, it's "frequency" decreases?, and that light it'self has no frequency,--it only appears to be having frequency due to it's appearance, and it's actually a result of a relationship between our frequency and the "concentration of energy" deposited into the electromagnetic wave in relativity to us?
I read the story, and when i came across ZERO, it reminded me of a notebook i wrote when i was in 10th grade high school, nearly 200 pages long. I have the book "ZERO". The book sparked my interest in imaginary numbers, but later led my interests into things far beyond what my own brain could handle. first i was curious about the square root of imaginary, and the square root of that, and so on.. until basicaly we're saying Something to the power of zero. i thot it would no longer be a value of any charge, but rather a neutral charge, not positive, not negative, not zero, but neutral. I thot of it to be another Zero, much like zero it'self, but a zero of higher order,. then i thot about an infinity of higher order. Eventually, i almost successfully mapped out the pattern of all symmetry, and i realized there were infinite orders, and infinite sets of those orders,. and there seemed to be possibilities of realities of higher orders and of lower orders, lower orders below that of numbers and charges, or orders lower than dimension(direction) or magnitude, still consisting of value, but not able to be defined by any known algebraic mean. Infinite realities "less real" than our own, and infinite realities "more real" than our own. Yet we are subject to those "lower" realities and to those "higher" realities. But the key to all of it, is within a single singularity, zero!, yet just zero alone already "contains" infinite "tunnels" to far out realities even beyond infinity. Our entire universe can be just a singularity containing infinite possibilities, yet all following simple pattern saying that all equals each other, all is within one point. This brings up a thot i once had, that a blackhole might look like it "dips" into a point where everything is crushed, but that's just from our point of view(ourside the blackhole), but at that singularity of the blackhole actually lies infinite realities. It's like a wormhole to other universes, but yet all equally real to our own also containing blackholes. You might think of the blackholes to be as gateways to either lower or higher sets of realities, and that we ourselves might be contained within one blackhole of a higher reality. I make this sound like we're living in endless Hell. But, this whole idea was born from some math thing i was doing, however, in the end i closed my book and wrote the final conclusion "Anything and Everything is possible, and exists somewhere"--be it just in our minds, which i'm also trying to impress that our minds are just as real as the universe we're in, it's just at a lower or higher order of reality than our own.
oops!, typo!, science without religion is LAME*, religion without science is blind... ;-)*****
Einstein said "Science without religion is blind, but religion without science is blind", sometimes when you try soo hard to find out your depest origins, you might not realize you're just trying to look for God, and God's looking at you right in your face thru the things you look into, but you don't know it. your concious hopes are only to find your origins, not God. and when you see God, it looks like something else to you, so you ignore God... ummmm, where am i trying to go now?, i think i'm lost... God knows....
Just recently we(humans) been able to transport some matter faster than the speed of light, but still not at the speed of light.
E=mc^2 works with m = relative mass to you, but if you wanted it to work in reletivity to velocity, it needs to be in the form of the equation:
E = m c^2/(1 - v^2/c^2)^(1/2); where m = absolute mass or rest mass;
Hence, m' = m/(1 - v^2/c^2)^(1/2), where m = absolute mass, and m' = relative mass to you, and v = velocity of mass relative to you
the equation allows matter to travel below or above the speed of light, but not at the speed of light, unless it is light it'self; E=mc2 is not all useless after all, it's useful in opening up some possible "doors" to tachyon physics. what do you think about that?