Wouldn't new strains of bacteria be evidence for variation within a kind according to natural selection - like Darwin's finches? If you are calling this 'evolution' then I agree. If you are talking about "The Theory of Evolution" or macroevolution, this requires different evidence.
You don't need billions for support, just a few. Like the dinosaur/bird and Lucy.
Not so. Darwinism claims that species transform into new ones over long periods of time with gradual changes. Each intermediate form would have to be viable. This would result in many more transitional species than we see in the fossil record.
New strains of bacteria which are resistent to antibiotics spring up every day.
This actually proves natural selection, not evolution.
The fossil record, coupled with carbon dating and other evidence, is in strong support of the theory of evolution.
How exactly does the fossil record support evolution? Where are the billions of transitional forms which would need to be present to support this theory?
Slashdot Mirror
The key word here, folks, was "new".
Wouldn't new strains of bacteria be evidence for variation within a kind according to natural selection - like Darwin's finches? If you are calling this 'evolution' then I agree. If you are talking about "The Theory of Evolution" or macroevolution, this requires different evidence.
You don't need billions for support, just a few. Like the dinosaur/bird and Lucy.
Not so. Darwinism claims that species transform into new ones over long periods of time with gradual changes. Each intermediate form would have to be viable. This would result in many more transitional species than we see in the fossil record.
New strains of bacteria which are resistent to antibiotics spring up every day.
This actually proves natural selection, not evolution.
The fossil record, coupled with carbon dating and other evidence, is in strong support of the theory of evolution.
How exactly does the fossil record support evolution? Where are the billions of transitional forms which would need to be present to support this theory?
It would be cool if I didn't even have to take out my wallet; I could just get within 3 feet of the sensor and it would open the door for me
You don't have to take out your wallet, just wave your butt in front of the reader. Looks really cool too.