Slashdot Mirror


User: Filthy+Rich+Bill

Filthy+Rich+Bill's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
5
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 5

  1. Re:Write State and Federal Lawmakers on Ask Slashdot: What can we do about UCITA? · · Score: 1

    I don't think you understand.
    There will be no free software
    since a large and critical mass
    of what makes a functional OS was
    and even is today being reverse-
    engineered. You won't have an option
    to use free software. That is what
    you are about to be deprived of.
    Read the UCITA carefully before
    commenting.

  2. Re:Ban on Reverse Engineering may be the worst par on Ask Slashdot: What can we do about UCITA? · · Score: 3

    I am not sure you people are
    aware of the magnitude of
    reverse-engineering that has
    taken place in Linux. In short,
    Samba is lossed but this is only
    the beginning. Much of the kernel
    code was and even is being reverse-
    engineered as well as very key
    hardware drivers. Also, some of the
    compiler coding was reverse engineered.
    To make matters worse, any exiting
    data/file format that is labeled
    proprietary would have to be reverse
    engineered to employ it. So, with no
    Samba, no kernel, no drivers, no compiler
    what is left of the open source
    movement. This is a clear reinforce
    existing monopoly law that affirms
    the government's ability to enforce
    anti-competitive behavior. Also, think
    about this, who would dare to use
    any proprietary software and be locked
    into proprietary formats forever.
    But with not alternative remaining
    what choice would anyone have.
    My point is don't be naive to think
    that you only lose Samba. There is
    reverse engineering at many levels
    which was in fact necessary as the
    coders did not have enough money to
    buy the protocols outright and release them.
    And even if they did this what would
    prevent an existing monopoly to change
    protocols after they sold out the
    rights to previous ones. Think of the
    ramifications of this law as it extneds
    not just to software but also to
    hardware as well. It really only serves
    to maintain the current anti-competitive
    status quo. The real question is why money
    is allowed to buy out this government
    despite its purported (but not actualized)
    obligations to its citizens.

  3. Re:Why would shareholders worry? Unless... on Red Hat IPO Fiasco Worries E*Trade Stock Holders · · Score: 1

    Don't you think this was all
    planned in advance by the BIG
    FISH eat LITTLE FISH capitalist
    mongrels?

  4. Re:Sun's position is not so tough on Netscape Out, iPlanet In · · Score: 1

    We haven't forgotten that
    Scott McNeily, head of Sun,
    has called GNULinux a commie
    OS. But, believe this: Our
    $299 GNULinux Servers from Pogo
    and others will destroy him in
    just a short time. He is trapped
    between the powerful MS monopoly
    that wants him destroyed and the
    GNULinux community that wants him
    gone. There is no where for the
    RAT to go except down with the
    sinking ship. Our $299 GNUlinux
    servers have plenty of iron already
    and we will have more iron at less
    cost with the Free Hardware Foundation
    underway. Sun is finished they
    are just lingering now. Scott will
    regret the day he called GNULinux
    a "commie" OS and we better not
    find our code being exploited in
    any of Sun's outrageously priced
    systems.

  5. Re:As is SGI, IBM, Oracle, and Sun on Cringley: Apple using Open Source to get Microsoft · · Score: 1

    What you don't seem to understand
    is that money rules everything.
    All these hardware companies work
    for us and they all share in our
    huge profits. They really have no
    interest in free software like Linux
    except to cherry-pick it for their
    own proprietary uses.