Once again you avoided the question: "If your "enhanced" story and the victim card to try to force it through without criticism was not to support the "they are all crying wolf" agenda then what was it for?"
Trying to get me to write about my career by calling my ability in it into question is a bit of a slimy evasion.
Again with the personal attacks and attempted doxxing. At least it was short and not pages of whining that would not fit without clicking the "read more" link. You have never answered. If your "enhanced" story and the victim card to try to force it through without criticism was not to support the "they are all crying wolf" agenda then what was it for?
I very carefully worded it so that anyone actually reading and understanding what I had written would not jump to the wrong conclusion and fly off the handle. Try reading more than the key words! They are nothing like the Mafia but they are an org that is setting out to commit what are currently crimes in a very methodical way. Because of that the normal very heavy handed approach to organised crime does not seem appropriate so they are getting away with it. That is by design. It's working. Some of those laws they have broken are getting repealed in some places. Making sense yet?
deliberately obtuse and dishonest misinterpretation of my reply
You misunderstood what I wrote and I clarified - nothing more than that.
Why else would you continue to communicate with me for so long instead of just letting it slide as a difference of opinion? The alternative is a wish to childishly insult, but make up your mind for yourself which it was.
It's things like that which make a moonbase or space station as a step to Mars a good idea. Attaching Earth built propulsion systems and a crew module to rock that you didn't have to launch is another idea. It a situation where you have to first ask why are you going to Mars and is it going to happen a lot.
Until we have the technology to get to mars in a matter of only a few days or less
Incredibly unlikely for a long list of reasons, but what is likely given time is having several things going there per year. You need food next week? Here's a shipment sent last year that's arriving next week.
NASA, unlike Musk PR (or whatever is really happening), is doing things the right way by carefully building the pieces of the puzzle over time - eg. experiments growing food at the south pole and all the hundreds of little things required to have a colony. They don't want it to turn out like the first settlement of Australia where they brought the wheat but forgot the bees. Really odd story, but people where very hungry until the first beekeeper and his bees were sent out. The Australian native bees were too small so got the nectar without spreading the pollen.
It's the same thing with the so-called 'War On (some) Drugs' or the failed Prohibition days of the 1920s. People as a population will not obey laws/regulations/policies when the majority oppose them and also (usually due in large part directly to those very laws/regulations/policies) perceive them to be vastly unjust/unfair/unwarranted/undesired/etc etc. All such laws do is turn otherwise law-abiding people into criminals and also stifle innovation and societal progress across multiple areas of civilization.
Hence my words "that looks more like civil disobedience" above.
Please read posts in full before crying "bullshit". Uber's business model involves challenging taxi laws by breaking them. They may be unjust laws in some cases but it's what they are doing just the same.
Furthermore, you're the one calling my accounts "proof".Not only have I never called them "proof"
Now you are not only pretending to be far more stupid than you clearly are but also playing word games. You have not managed to convince me to withdraw my accusation about you pushing the "not many rapists but lots of women crying wolf" agenda by now despite all kinds of petty and annoying tricks so I suggest you just give up.
The reflexive anti-government attitudes of many is particularly puzzling in a democracy
They want a "strong" leader like King George back. Koch is available. It's all about being naive and having no clue how utterly fucked over they will be if they end up with a "strong" leader. Rand and her book about how wonderful it would be to have a Tsarist nobility in the USA (so long as you are a jailbait princess screwing your way to the top that is) helped add to the delusion.
Piecework is innovative? Tax avoidance is innovative?
Uber/Lyft/etc made the mistake of not making sure they paid off the right "good old boy network" people
With political donations etc that is exactly who they are paying off and is why they were not driven out of town the second they showed up to challenge the taxi company/government arrangement designed to prevent competition so long as the governments get something.
The thing that confuses so many and another reason they have been able to work their way in is that it's organised crime that looks more like civil disobedience than what governments are used to with co-ordinated rulebreaking.
Seriously. Why the fuck should NASA be sucking up to guys who were half a notch below 'desert savages' fifty years ago when we were already in space
Because NASA has had it's funding cut since then and they are following the example of half the Presidents in the last few decades who have been sucking up to 'desert savages'. Working Bush, vacation Bush, Reagan and even Clinton would do whatever the House of Saud wanted and the UAE bunch are closely connected.
How many of NASA's rockets so they even produce themselves?
Does it matter? The spacecraft called Eagle that landed on the moon was build by Grumman in New York State and not next to the launch pad by NASA themselves. Why should they change now to doing everything internally when they didn't do that at their peak?
Also historically the bandsmen and various others got the wounded out. It takes a lot of people to being a fight and some of those that are not actual combat troops can drop everything while combat continues. That staggering amount of ammo used now has to be carried in by someone for instance.
How would changing the personnel of the agency affect its directive? They are all following orders.
Orders from highly unprofessional but well connected idiots (eg. Star Trek set thing that was a fuckup on every level - the designer should never have been let on site for security reasons for a start) and plenty of anecdotes about unprofessional staff before even the outsourcing to the bunch that employed Snowden got out. Even that outsourcing was a bit of nepotism that never should have happened but a former employee (Booz or the other guy) was thought to be deserving of a reward at the expense of the taxpayer - thus in-house secrets were outsourced.
I can only imagine your shattered view of reality that you've constructed from TV and movies.
I wish. It turns out that the way things were run in "Dr Strangelove" is far more professional than the reality with these toy soldiers
seems that you're implying that I should back down, sir. You see, as I'm right
Right when you wrote about me "quite possibly a serial rapist and abuser, possibly even involving children"?
You've made my point about "false rape accusations" very clearly. For you the bar appears to be set so low that even somebody that has annoyed you in a trivial online discussion gets to be accused.
Meanwhile the rest of us, including the guy you defended with your "proof", were discussing the incredibly rare accusations that land people in jail for no reason.
Slashdot Mirror
Yes because your story changed after that.
Why post such a convenient "enhanced" story? Nothing but whining and denials with no answer in sight.
Think of when the ban was put in place and I'll bet you'll find that it was referring to the older gun.
So what were you doing?
I've got no idea how many times I've asked that but you keep on evading the question.
Once again you avoided the question: "If your "enhanced" story and the victim card to try to force it through without criticism was not to support the "they are all crying wolf" agenda then what was it for?"
Trying to get me to write about my career by calling my ability in it into question is a bit of a slimy evasion.
Again with the personal attacks and attempted doxxing. At least it was short and not pages of whining that would not fit without clicking the "read more" link.
You have never answered. If your "enhanced" story and the victim card to try to force it through without criticism was not to support the "they are all crying wolf" agenda then what was it for?
It's working. Some of those laws they have broken are getting repealed in some places.
Making sense yet?
You misunderstood what I wrote and I clarified - nothing more than that.
There were European bees on the second fleet.
Why else would you continue to communicate with me for so long instead of just letting it slide as a difference of opinion? The alternative is a wish to childishly insult, but make up your mind for yourself which it was.
Still whining?
Have you learned something from this tedious exercise about putting up fake "proof" to defend rapists?
It's things like that which make a moonbase or space station as a step to Mars a good idea. Attaching Earth built propulsion systems and a crew module to rock that you didn't have to launch is another idea.
It a situation where you have to first ask why are you going to Mars and is it going to happen a lot.
Incredibly unlikely for a long list of reasons, but what is likely given time is having several things going there per year. You need food next week? Here's a shipment sent last year that's arriving next week.
NASA, unlike Musk PR (or whatever is really happening), is doing things the right way by carefully building the pieces of the puzzle over time - eg. experiments growing food at the south pole and all the hundreds of little things required to have a colony.
They don't want it to turn out like the first settlement of Australia where they brought the wheat but forgot the bees. Really odd story, but people where very hungry until the first beekeeper and his bees were sent out. The Australian native bees were too small so got the nectar without spreading the pollen.
Ok.
b3c4u53 n454 h45 h4d 175 fund1n6 cu7 51nc3 7h3n 4nd 7h3y 4r3 f0ll0w1n6 7h3 3x4mpl3 0f h4lf 7h3 pr351d3n75 1n 7h3 l457 f3w d3c4d35 wh0 h4v3 b33n 5uck1n6 up 70 'd353r7 54v4635'. w0rk1n6 bu5h, v4c4710n bu5h, r3464n 4nd 3v3n cl1n70n w0uld d0 wh473v3r 7h3 h0u53 0f 54ud w4n73d 4nd 7h3 u43 bunch 4r3 cl053ly c0nn3c73d
Apostrophe fixed!
Hence my words "that looks more like civil disobedience" above.
Please read posts in full before crying "bullshit".
Uber's business model involves challenging taxi laws by breaking them. They may be unjust laws in some cases but it's what they are doing just the same.
Good reason to shut them down and go back to the sort of professional military intelligence that they replaced some decades back.
Really? Try actually reading posts before writing something so STUPID in response. Your strawman was never here.
Now you are not only pretending to be far more stupid than you clearly are but also playing word games. You have not managed to convince me to withdraw my accusation about you pushing the "not many rapists but lots of women crying wolf" agenda by now despite all kinds of petty and annoying tricks so I suggest you just give up.
They want a "strong" leader like King George back. Koch is available.
It's all about being naive and having no clue how utterly fucked over they will be if they end up with a "strong" leader. Rand and her book about how wonderful it would be to have a Tsarist nobility in the USA (so long as you are a jailbait princess screwing your way to the top that is) helped add to the delusion.
With political donations etc that is exactly who they are paying off and is why they were not driven out of town the second they showed up to challenge the taxi company/government arrangement designed to prevent competition so long as the governments get something.
The thing that confuses so many and another reason they have been able to work their way in is that it's organised crime that looks more like civil disobedience than what governments are used to with co-ordinated rulebreaking.
Because NASA has had it's funding cut since then and they are following the example of half the Presidents in the last few decades who have been sucking up to 'desert savages'. Working Bush, vacation Bush, Reagan and even Clinton would do whatever the House of Saud wanted and the UAE bunch are closely connected.
Does it matter? The spacecraft called Eagle that landed on the moon was build by Grumman in New York State and not next to the launch pad by NASA themselves. Why should they change now to doing everything internally when they didn't do that at their peak?
Asimove? Who the fuck is that?
Similar to a dick move but trademarked by Apple.
Also historically the bandsmen and various others got the wounded out. It takes a lot of people to being a fight and some of those that are not actual combat troops can drop everything while combat continues.
That staggering amount of ammo used now has to be carried in by someone for instance.
As someone who once fired at a very large wild pig with a .22 bolt action I can see why the ban is in place.
Right tool for the job kids.
There is a little icon next to the UID that marks that poster as an editor.
Orders from highly unprofessional but well connected idiots (eg. Star Trek set thing that was a fuckup on every level - the designer should never have been let on site for security reasons for a start) and plenty of anecdotes about unprofessional staff before even the outsourcing to the bunch that employed Snowden got out. Even that outsourcing was a bit of nepotism that never should have happened but a former employee (Booz or the other guy) was thought to be deserving of a reward at the expense of the taxpayer - thus in-house secrets were outsourced.
I wish. It turns out that the way things were run in "Dr Strangelove" is far more professional than the reality with these toy soldiers
Right when you wrote about me "quite possibly a serial rapist and abuser, possibly even involving children"?
You've made my point about "false rape accusations" very clearly. For you the bar appears to be set so low that even somebody that has annoyed you in a trivial online discussion gets to be accused.
Meanwhile the rest of us, including the guy you defended with your "proof", were discussing the incredibly rare accusations that land people in jail for no reason.