They also just want to look at the problem of pollution coming from gas cars but not the pollution created during the manufacturing of electric cars
Typically the entire point is to not have the pollution in mid-city so that's not considered anything other than a triviality for better or worse. You do have a point but it will usually be dismissed as irrelevant or scraping the barrel to find something wrong somewhere. It's better to argue on cost versus performance or other things that people consider more relevant.
Actually they are. I'm not sure where I read the article but if you look up the number of wells operating in the USA two years ago versus today it's a massive drop, something like 75% or more shut down.
Yes I know it's sarcasm above but it's worth looking up the number of wells running in the USA versus two years ago.
The Saudis have won.
The attempt at energy independence via shale etc failing due to the Saudis dumping oil has resulted in a lot of people getting driven out of business and a lot of jobs lost because they cannot compete against a cartel that has already paid for a lot of infrastructure and could afford to drive the oil price down to rock bottom for a while. It's a kingdom showing that an entire wealthy country under autocratic control can tell capitalism to fuck off and die - a ridiculous situation but that's why the jobs are gone and your post is a bit out of date.
Back to the main topic, having things such as electric cars in the mix puts us less at the mercy of foreign powers. If we do nothing it's not just the Saudis but the Iranians and Russians could have us by the balls in the long run.
Personally I think voting should be compulsory since it is the duty of a citizen, however those superdelates do skew things at the stage of the primaries. It means Sanders needs to be as popular as Obama was to deal with it.
If you've come in late suggest you follow it from when the suggestion was made to call it LiGnuX and you'll get a clearer idea of what was behind the suggested renaming. Don't take it from me, use google and track down those FSF newsletters.
There's the party machinery and reserved votes that means the popular vote in the primaries has far less impact than you would normally think in a democracy. That's why Sanders is given a low chance despite filling stadiums.
is a Trump nomination which induces the spark that burns the whole party to the ground, and then it can be rebuilt from the ashes
People said that sort of thing about Reagan. It got worse. I've got no idea why Trump isn't just being mocked by everyone about the obvious and stupid wall lie along with all the other obvious lies. What he's really do is a bit of a mystery.
Old money Trump is an incubated and hatched Republican Party reptile who relied on Party connections to pull him back from the brink four times. Just because he has not run for an office before does not make him an "outsider". Maybe not "inner circle" so not what you are calling a *real* Republican, but I would call use a different and far broader definition for a "real Republican". I get what you mean but he's no independent. He's just another aspect of the Republican Party that we are not used to seeing so close to the top of the tree.
I'd just like to point out that when Sarah Palin was caught using her personal email for State business there were a lot of people on the Republican side who argued that it was not a big deal. That's probably one reason Hillary is getting away with it. Besides, it's trivial compared with some of the other things she has done that came out from the cable leaks. She ordered that credit card details of diplomats should be obtained so that they could be framed or blackmailed among other things. It's probably her anger over the leaks that led to the ridiculous situation Assange is in where he fears rendition from Sweden.
Yes but the leader is supposed to be doing what is best for the people and not just dictating their own view. That was supposed to be the difference between Washington and King George.
When some people push to be a "strong leader" and speak of the "tyranny of the masses" it's a thinly disguised move to roll things back towards having a King and let even Magna Carta be damned.
Reagan was a symptom. The Republican Party invited in a pile of evangelicals of a very strange type (money worshippers really - merchants in the temple that Jesus would have thrown out) and that skewed the party towards the far side of crazy. You know the sort - like that Enron guy who said he was doing "God's work" by gaming electricity markets.
I would say Ford. He even took a bribe (OK then, well timed "donation" that he picked up personally in Jakarta - looks very much like an outright bribe to me) from Indonesia FFS over the goings on in East Timor. He made even Nixon look like a saint. On the D side - maybe Johnson.
The single biggest problem I have with trade agreements like NAFTA and the TPP is the Investor-State Dispute Settlement provisions. They are an abrogation of national sovereignty
An example of how much they are is an ongoing Investor-State Dispute over warning labels on cigarette packets. A government should just be able to tell a cigarette company to fuck off and be happy we let you sell your lethal drugs at all instead of wasting taxpayers money in court.
They could but the indecent ones have far more money to burn and run out the clock.
I find it very strange that an old money incubated and hatched Republican reptile who has been dragged back from failure four times due to Party connections is an "outsider" who is going to stop crony capitalism. He's almost as inside as you can get and only has more money than a homeless person due to crony capitalism.
Now that I think of it, consider all those coal seam gas and shale gas projects where the well is drilled sometimes many months before the infrastructure to collect the gas (which often comes up full of water). There's a lot of stuff flaring off or even just getting vented.
You can boot off it, use it for scratch storage, use it for an OS disk, keep software on it - a lot of stuff in datacentres does not need to last forever or be spread over a raidz2 array or whatever. You comment is about as over the top as saying that there is no place for a cheap keyboard in a workplace and we should all have an IBM Model M.
I use ZFS a lot but I'm not so blinkered as to think it has to be used everywhere even in situations where it really does not matter.
I think their aim is to try to get software under rival licences under theirs instead. That was ultimately behind the gtk VS qt (gnome VS KDE) storm in a teacup and what was telling is the fight didn't stop when the complaints were addressed and the qt licence changed, the fight continued until the rival licence was abandoned and the GPL was adopted. So I think it's more of the same of that tired old fight.
It also potentially dilutes the authority of the FSF and some leading members of that like to imply they own linux - even going as far as putting "gnu" in front of the name of something that is not a gnu or FSF project. Having another non-GPL thing in the mix, after X, apache, nvidia and so on annoys them. It would be a non-story without such agitation.
There is a part compiled on installation that is just a wrapper to make sure the binary hooks in properly to whatever kernel you have - a translation layer really. Some distros do that for you for their standard kernels.
Slashdot Mirror
Typically the entire point is to not have the pollution in mid-city so that's not considered anything other than a triviality for better or worse. You do have a point but it will usually be dismissed as irrelevant or scraping the barrel to find something wrong somewhere. It's better to argue on cost versus performance or other things that people consider more relevant.
Actually they are. I'm not sure where I read the article but if you look up the number of wells operating in the USA two years ago versus today it's a massive drop, something like 75% or more shut down.
It's not really a free market. It's a medieval kingdom telling capitalism to go fuck itself.
Yes I know it's sarcasm above but it's worth looking up the number of wells running in the USA versus two years ago.
The Saudis have won.
The attempt at energy independence via shale etc failing due to the Saudis dumping oil has resulted in a lot of people getting driven out of business and a lot of jobs lost because they cannot compete against a cartel that has already paid for a lot of infrastructure and could afford to drive the oil price down to rock bottom for a while. It's a kingdom showing that an entire wealthy country under autocratic control can tell capitalism to fuck off and die - a ridiculous situation but that's why the jobs are gone and your post is a bit out of date.
Back to the main topic, having things such as electric cars in the mix puts us less at the mercy of foreign powers. If we do nothing it's not just the Saudis but the Iranians and Russians could have us by the balls in the long run.
Personally I think voting should be compulsory since it is the duty of a citizen, however those superdelates do skew things at the stage of the primaries.
It means Sanders needs to be as popular as Obama was to deal with it.
If you've come in late suggest you follow it from when the suggestion was made to call it LiGnuX and you'll get a clearer idea of what was behind the suggested renaming. Don't take it from me, use google and track down those FSF newsletters.
There's the party machinery and reserved votes that means the popular vote in the primaries has far less impact than you would normally think in a democracy.
That's why Sanders is given a low chance despite filling stadiums.
People said that sort of thing about Reagan. It got worse.
I've got no idea why Trump isn't just being mocked by everyone about the obvious and stupid wall lie along with all the other obvious lies. What he's really do is a bit of a mystery.
Old money Trump is an incubated and hatched Republican Party reptile who relied on Party connections to pull him back from the brink four times. Just because he has not run for an office before does not make him an "outsider". Maybe not "inner circle" so not what you are calling a *real* Republican, but I would call use a different and far broader definition for a "real Republican". I get what you mean but he's no independent. He's just another aspect of the Republican Party that we are not used to seeing so close to the top of the tree.
I'd just like to point out that when Sarah Palin was caught using her personal email for State business there were a lot of people on the Republican side who argued that it was not a big deal.
That's probably one reason Hillary is getting away with it.
Besides, it's trivial compared with some of the other things she has done that came out from the cable leaks. She ordered that credit card details of diplomats should be obtained so that they could be framed or blackmailed among other things. It's probably her anger over the leaks that led to the ridiculous situation Assange is in where he fears rendition from Sweden.
Yes but the leader is supposed to be doing what is best for the people and not just dictating their own view. That was supposed to be the difference between Washington and King George.
When some people push to be a "strong leader" and speak of the "tyranny of the masses" it's a thinly disguised move to roll things back towards having a King and let even Magna Carta be damned.
Reagan was a symptom. The Republican Party invited in a pile of evangelicals of a very strange type (money worshippers really - merchants in the temple that Jesus would have thrown out) and that skewed the party towards the far side of crazy.
You know the sort - like that Enron guy who said he was doing "God's work" by gaming electricity markets.
I would say Ford. He even took a bribe (OK then, well timed "donation" that he picked up personally in Jakarta - looks very much like an outright bribe to me) from Indonesia FFS over the goings on in East Timor. He made even Nixon look like a saint.
On the D side - maybe Johnson.
An example of how much they are is an ongoing Investor-State Dispute over warning labels on cigarette packets. A government should just be able to tell a cigarette company to fuck off and be happy we let you sell your lethal drugs at all instead of wasting taxpayers money in court.
So after being pulled back from the brink four times by Party connections he's his own man? Seriously?
They could but the indecent ones have far more money to burn and run out the clock.
I find it very strange that an old money incubated and hatched Republican reptile who has been dragged back from failure four times due to Party connections is an "outsider" who is going to stop crony capitalism. He's almost as inside as you can get and only has more money than a homeless person due to crony capitalism.
Now that I think of it, consider all those coal seam gas and shale gas projects where the well is drilled sometimes many months before the infrastructure to collect the gas (which often comes up full of water). There's a lot of stuff flaring off or even just getting vented.
Nigeria get most of their electricity now from a flare like that that had previously been running for decades with the heat wasted.
You can boot off it, use it for scratch storage, use it for an OS disk, keep software on it - a lot of stuff in datacentres does not need to last forever or be spread over a raidz2 array or whatever. You comment is about as over the top as saying that there is no place for a cheap keyboard in a workplace and we should all have an IBM Model M.
I use ZFS a lot but I'm not so blinkered as to think it has to be used everywhere even in situations where it really does not matter.
I think their aim is to try to get software under rival licences under theirs instead.
That was ultimately behind the gtk VS qt (gnome VS KDE) storm in a teacup and what was telling is the fight didn't stop when the complaints were addressed and the qt licence changed, the fight continued until the rival licence was abandoned and the GPL was adopted.
So I think it's more of the same of that tired old fight.
Currently yes, it only gets criticism because it's a bit behind the other ZFS ports.
Since you can have ext4 on top of ZFS and just use ZFS as RAID it may, but it's probably easier just to have one or the other.
Linux is not an FSF or gnu project.
They are shooting at somebody else's feet.
I thought too until I starting using it.
Many of which run - guess what?
It also potentially dilutes the authority of the FSF and some leading members of that like to imply they own linux - even going as far as putting "gnu" in front of the name of something that is not a gnu or FSF project.
Having another non-GPL thing in the mix, after X, apache, nvidia and so on annoys them.
It would be a non-story without such agitation.
There is a part compiled on installation that is just a wrapper to make sure the binary hooks in properly to whatever kernel you have - a translation layer really. Some distros do that for you for their standard kernels.