Why does a physical machine need to be rebooted less often than a VM?
Because it's not running unstable shit so an abstraction that is there is order to stop and start unstable shit (for that purpose of VM) is not required.
Your lack of a suggested alternative speaks louder than anything else...
Do you really know so little of email, calenders etc that you cannot think of many yourself? Even if stuck in a monoculture that's no excuse for not reading about other developments.
We manage several hundred Exchange servers... If your people can't maintain Exchange
With respect, go ask your "people" and you'll hear something like the above complaints. Maybe even the one about the patch that set MS Exchange to be an open relay by default no matter how it was set before - the spammers really loved that one.
If your people can't maintain Exchange
Who said anything about failure? It was about how success is difficult, vast resources required (extra machines for failover plus just getting enough performance) - hence your "several hundred Exchange servers" under the adult supervision of whatever is running the easily rebootable virtual machines instead of a small number of big boxes running on bare metal with less overhead because they don't need to be rebooted all the time.
We haven't had a single FNG that didn't install and maintain Exchange within 6 months
"Easy" takes 6 months? You've made my point about how much of a mess it is with just that, let alone the ecosystem of third party addons or adult supervision of real mail servers upstream to keep it virus free, do faxes and so on.
Quantity and sugar type are the issue. Corn syrup doesn't taste as sweet as refined sugar so more is used. It's also mostly fructose which is more fattening for the same quantity than cane sugar. So 1 litre of Coke per day is going to make you fat but if it uses corn syrup it's going to make you fatter and work your liver much harder than if it was sucrose. That's a nasty unintended consequence especially if kids with relatively small livers are drinking it.
The attack on the messenger is amusing since I don't even drink Coke or similar and avoid sugary processed foods (bread full of sugar? WTF? It's not a cake). What inspires such stupid attacks anyway?
The name is all the advice of what to do with it that you need. It took about a decade before all that you would have expected in version 1 was going. All the fun of configuration by registry hack, a fifty step bare metal recovery procedure with possible showstoppers at every step and memory leaks that meant a scheduled reboot once a week to avoid the thing freezing up.
So, to those that say "no other single thing can replace MS Exchange"? MS Exchange itself is a suite of applications so why insist on replacing many with one?
Yet a gun owners union is fine. Even when one of the people running it had to be pardoned to be saved from execution for treason, selling weapons to the terrorists that had killed over a hundred marines less than a year earlier and embezzling money for a convertible plus house airconditioning. So why are unions who do not do overt political manipulation devil spawn but a gun owners union in all but name is something to be praised from the rooftops? It makes no sense so I'm curious as to the answer.
Don't blame the unions for what trust-fund babies running daddies company did to the US car industry. If the guy on the shop floor could see the Japanese coming what could he do? Requisition a few hundred million for a new assembly line for a new model? It's really funny how anti-union some Americans are when they vocally support the extremist union tactics of the NRA, which can be accurately described as a very political gun owners union.
Where on earth did you hear that from? Australia has less import tarriffs than the USA. The US tarriffs on sugar and steel are on the other hand a case study of unintended consequences due to protectionist economics. The first has you all getting fat on expensive corn syrup instead of very cheap cane sugar from a choice of many of your southern neighbours, the second resulted in manufacturing moving offshore to where competition has driven down the steel prices. Australia's economic problems are due to completely different reasons - such as ignoring nearly everything apart from selling dirt to countries with more money and being run by a bunch of used car salesmen.
Get it right - try instead "Something the Saudis are working hard to reverse by bringing the oil price down low enough to drive the US producers out of the market". Fracking costs more than a shallow well in a desert.
So your strategy for discussion is to attribute the opinions of people to the things they describe? You must really hate journalists that report on murders.
The recent Mad Max is pretty well Monster Trucks plus Guns - then fullon video game action starts and barely slows down at any time until the credits. That's why the comment by epyT-R calling it "feminist" was so utterly ridiculous - but he's really just parroting some blogger that lost his kids to his ex-wife in court, blames the world, and ranted about Mad Max.
Which is something that can be forced and is pretty well the only useful bit of Network Address Translation left if you have enough IP addresses. A proxy on a bridge is another option but less trivial to set up.
I really don't get the point of all your verbiage since IPv6 can also do NAT and a firewall is far more effective at doing the other tasks described anyway. There's no real security with NAT as shown with some of the NAT traversal hacks demonstrated over the years and even featured here. Relying on hiding instead of actual blocking is not a wise action, especially when the outright blocking is trivially accomplished.
I really cannot see any advantage of IPv4 plus NAT apart from the obvious of it already being in place - an advantage that vanishes with new installations that may have to be behind multiple layers of NAT that make it hard for the things you want to make it through.
I hadn't either until I did a very quick IPv6 course. iTunes is another offender with an incredibly large number on connections on port 80 for each user. It doesn't take a lot of people behind an IP address for it to hit the limit of 64k connections if a single page is doing well over 500 on a one minute refresh cycle to make sure the users have up to date advertisements.
The only reason that people have to create nasty hacks to work around NAT
NAT is the nasty hack itself and was a pain in the neck when it came in. As for a local IP being visible or not being orthogonal to a firewall - NO - that has always been the firewalls job and is utterly trivial to implement on a firewall. Don't want incoming connections to anything apart from host X - no problem. Want outgoing from Y and Z and replies from everything they send out - no problem.
the men are either made into insecure, bumbling fools
Like Max who saves the fucking day? I know you got this shit from some guy who thinks the entire fucking world is out to get him because he lost his kids to a court decision, so he's willing to even blame some guy half way around the fucking world making a testosterone fuelled action movie despite how utterly fucking STUPID that is - but why are you letting his shit dribble out of your mouth? You have not been hurt enough for sanity to no longer matter so why expose us to such stupidity deliberately? What agenda do you think is so fucking important that you are lying to the kiddies to push it? What is making you sink so fucking low?
I'll bet some loser demanded realtime monitoring and/or control from his office and MS Windows PC instead of maintaining the careful airgap specified by the people who designed the systems in place. The main point in the past of having the "remote interface" as a telephone to the guy in the control room was so the guy on the spot could see which instructions were utterly stupid before they could be implemented.
I thought the first half was better, and the speculation mostly seemed plausible.
Agree. It's like two different books, almost two different genres.
I find I don't get a clear picture of what's going on often which makes action scenes really rather confusing
Greg Egan suggests pencil and scratch paper to follow some of his stuff and Stevenson is getting close to that at times:)
How did they not cook from the heat generated by their plant growing machinery?
Rock still conducts even though it doesn't do it well. So long as there was somewhere colder it's not impossible if they have enough surface area to spread it around. With vast resources I'd do it by dumping the heat into a huge underground lake in contact with a LOT of cool rock so the heat can conduct out of the water. No cool rock? Not even a bit above 30C? You die unless you can radiate it out on the surface or something.
Why did the pingers get sea-creature colouration. The sea had only been usable for 500 years. Not remotely long enough
Unless I mis-remember the sea was only at pre-impact depths for 500 years but didn't entirely vanish, hence the pingers and deep sea stuff living - so "usable" just not covering enough ground as desired for terraforming.
After what Abrams did to Trek I suppose we should not expect different with the current effort. Replace "Wars" with "Trek" and your comment works, I'll soon see if it applies to both, preferably on a day when the cinema airconditioning will make it worth it whether the movie is worth seeing or not.
Except reality was a guy handing a script to a woman who also works in the movie industry and asking her opinion - just like what happens with many scripts only this time you somehow think the woman was pushing a feminist agenda instead of doing a job. It's no more feminist than "Dukes of Hazard" and written by a guy that grew up in the country shooting huge wild pigs as a kid and has more balls than you will ever grow. You saw all those eye-candy girls and still thought it was feminist? Or are you just parroting some family court victim that hates women who pretended a road chase movie was somehow feminist?
Deliberate pretended stupidity to push some wacky party line is something that really pisses me off, hence the rant. Please don't mislead the kiddies just to push your very petty little crusade against women in IT or whatever the fuck has got you acting like a person ten times worse than you really are.
Ahoy there! Maties I'd say foorsooth that there Pirate Bay has prior art hard to starboard.
Also software patents are of course far more stupid than even this post. Boiled down and removing "on a computer" maybe even the Enigma machine would be prior art to sending coded messages without going through a central point after being told how to send the messages by the central point.
I've been keeping up and I'm pretty sure that "IP address does not equal person" is going to be overturned after accurate logs are seized and released a few times. You may want to ignore the trend but it's happening and the MPAA just keeps on spamming the court systems of multiple countries to get their way. It'd not about IPv6 only persistance of lawyers and the very consumer unfriendly, downright draconian laws they are trying to ram through to get access to all our "metadata".
Very long way to go with that, but in some situations yes, probably into the double digits of percentage by now. As the coal power generation units age that replacement will increase. Steel production is down (economic hassles) so coal use is down in that area where natural gas does not work because the coal is needed for a chemical reaction as well as the heat.
Slashdot Mirror
Because it's not running unstable shit so an abstraction that is there is order to stop and start unstable shit (for that purpose of VM) is not required.
Do you really know so little of email, calenders etc that you cannot think of many yourself? Even if stuck in a monoculture that's no excuse for not reading about other developments.
With respect, go ask your "people" and you'll hear something like the above complaints. Maybe even the one about the patch that set MS Exchange to be an open relay by default no matter how it was set before - the spammers really loved that one.
Who said anything about failure? It was about how success is difficult, vast resources required (extra machines for failover plus just getting enough performance) - hence your "several hundred Exchange servers" under the adult supervision of whatever is running the easily rebootable virtual machines instead of a small number of big boxes running on bare metal with less overhead because they don't need to be rebooted all the time.
"Easy" takes 6 months? You've made my point about how much of a mess it is with just that, let alone the ecosystem of third party addons or adult supervision of real mail servers upstream to keep it virus free, do faxes and so on.
It's in far better shape than it was in 1980 and it was called a "superpower" then.
Go ask a lobby group and they will laugh at how naive you are.
The difference between the two places is how far down the ladder the rot goes.
Quantity and sugar type are the issue. Corn syrup doesn't taste as sweet as refined sugar so more is used. It's also mostly fructose which is more fattening for the same quantity than cane sugar.
So 1 litre of Coke per day is going to make you fat but if it uses corn syrup it's going to make you fatter and work your liver much harder than if it was sucrose. That's a nasty unintended consequence especially if kids with relatively small livers are drinking it.
The attack on the messenger is amusing since I don't even drink Coke or similar and avoid sugary processed foods (bread full of sugar? WTF? It's not a cake). What inspires such stupid attacks anyway?
Which is exactly what rabid union haters think of when the word union is mentioned. They ignore all the positives.
Same with unions then. Where did you get some other idea from?
The name is all the advice of what to do with it that you need.
It took about a decade before all that you would have expected in version 1 was going. All the fun of configuration by registry hack, a fifty step bare metal recovery procedure with possible showstoppers at every step and memory leaks that meant a scheduled reboot once a week to avoid the thing freezing up.
So, to those that say "no other single thing can replace MS Exchange"? MS Exchange itself is a suite of applications so why insist on replacing many with one?
Yet a gun owners union is fine.
Even when one of the people running it had to be pardoned to be saved from execution for treason, selling weapons to the terrorists that had killed over a hundred marines less than a year earlier and embezzling money for a convertible plus house airconditioning.
So why are unions who do not do overt political manipulation devil spawn but a gun owners union in all but name is something to be praised from the rooftops? It makes no sense so I'm curious as to the answer.
Don't blame the unions for what trust-fund babies running daddies company did to the US car industry. If the guy on the shop floor could see the Japanese coming what could he do? Requisition a few hundred million for a new assembly line for a new model?
It's really funny how anti-union some Americans are when they vocally support the extremist union tactics of the NRA, which can be accurately described as a very political gun owners union.
Where on earth did you hear that from? Australia has less import tarriffs than the USA.
The US tarriffs on sugar and steel are on the other hand a case study of unintended consequences due to protectionist economics. The first has you all getting fat on expensive corn syrup instead of very cheap cane sugar from a choice of many of your southern neighbours, the second resulted in manufacturing moving offshore to where competition has driven down the steel prices.
Australia's economic problems are due to completely different reasons - such as ignoring nearly everything apart from selling dirt to countries with more money and being run by a bunch of used car salesmen.
Get it right - try instead "Something the Saudis are working hard to reverse by bringing the oil price down low enough to drive the US producers out of the market". Fracking costs more than a shallow well in a desert.
So your strategy for discussion is to attribute the opinions of people to the things they describe?
You must really hate journalists that report on murders.
The recent Mad Max is pretty well Monster Trucks plus Guns - then fullon video game action starts and barely slows down at any time until the credits. That's why the comment by epyT-R calling it "feminist" was so utterly ridiculous - but he's really just parroting some blogger that lost his kids to his ex-wife in court, blames the world, and ranted about Mad Max.
Which is something that can be forced and is pretty well the only useful bit of Network Address Translation left if you have enough IP addresses. A proxy on a bridge is another option but less trivial to set up.
I really don't get the point of all your verbiage since IPv6 can also do NAT and a firewall is far more effective at doing the other tasks described anyway. There's no real security with NAT as shown with some of the NAT traversal hacks demonstrated over the years and even featured here. Relying on hiding instead of actual blocking is not a wise action, especially when the outright blocking is trivially accomplished.
I really cannot see any advantage of IPv4 plus NAT apart from the obvious of it already being in place - an advantage that vanishes with new installations that may have to be behind multiple layers of NAT that make it hard for the things you want to make it through.
I hadn't either until I did a very quick IPv6 course.
iTunes is another offender with an incredibly large number on connections on port 80 for each user.
It doesn't take a lot of people behind an IP address for it to hit the limit of 64k connections if a single page is doing well over 500 on a one minute refresh cycle to make sure the users have up to date advertisements.
NAT is the nasty hack itself and was a pain in the neck when it came in.
As for a local IP being visible or not being orthogonal to a firewall - NO - that has always been the firewalls job and is utterly trivial to implement on a firewall. Don't want incoming connections to anything apart from host X - no problem. Want outgoing from Y and Z and replies from everything they send out - no problem.
Like Max who saves the fucking day?
I know you got this shit from some guy who thinks the entire fucking world is out to get him because he lost his kids to a court decision, so he's willing to even blame some guy half way around the fucking world making a testosterone fuelled action movie despite how utterly fucking STUPID that is - but why are you letting his shit dribble out of your mouth? You have not been hurt enough for sanity to no longer matter so why expose us to such stupidity deliberately? What agenda do you think is so fucking important that you are lying to the kiddies to push it? What is making you sink so fucking low?
How did it enter the grid.
I'll bet some loser demanded realtime monitoring and/or control from his office and MS Windows PC instead of maintaining the careful airgap specified by the people who designed the systems in place.
The main point in the past of having the "remote interface" as a telephone to the guy in the control room was so the guy on the spot could see which instructions were utterly stupid before they could be implemented.
That's what publishers want at the moment.
Agree. It's like two different books, almost two different genres.
Greg Egan suggests pencil and scratch paper to follow some of his stuff and Stevenson is getting close to that at times :)
Rock still conducts even though it doesn't do it well. So long as there was somewhere colder it's not impossible if they have enough surface area to spread it around. With vast resources I'd do it by dumping the heat into a huge underground lake in contact with a LOT of cool rock so the heat can conduct out of the water. No cool rock? Not even a bit above 30C? You die unless you can radiate it out on the surface or something.
Unless I mis-remember the sea was only at pre-impact depths for 500 years but didn't entirely vanish, hence the pingers and deep sea stuff living - so "usable" just not covering enough ground as desired for terraforming.
After what Abrams did to Trek I suppose we should not expect different with the current effort.
Replace "Wars" with "Trek" and your comment works, I'll soon see if it applies to both, preferably on a day when the cinema airconditioning will make it worth it whether the movie is worth seeing or not.
Except reality was a guy handing a script to a woman who also works in the movie industry and asking her opinion - just like what happens with many scripts only this time you somehow think the woman was pushing a feminist agenda instead of doing a job. It's no more feminist than "Dukes of Hazard" and written by a guy that grew up in the country shooting huge wild pigs as a kid and has more balls than you will ever grow. You saw all those eye-candy girls and still thought it was feminist? Or are you just parroting some family court victim that hates women who pretended a road chase movie was somehow feminist?
Deliberate pretended stupidity to push some wacky party line is something that really pisses me off, hence the rant. Please don't mislead the kiddies just to push your very petty little crusade against women in IT or whatever the fuck has got you acting like a person ten times worse than you really are.
Ahoy there! Maties I'd say foorsooth that there Pirate Bay has prior art hard to starboard.
Also software patents are of course far more stupid than even this post. Boiled down and removing "on a computer" maybe even the Enigma machine would be prior art to sending coded messages without going through a central point after being told how to send the messages by the central point.
I've been keeping up and I'm pretty sure that "IP address does not equal person" is going to be overturned after accurate logs are seized and released a few times. You may want to ignore the trend but it's happening and the MPAA just keeps on spamming the court systems of multiple countries to get their way.
It'd not about IPv6 only persistance of lawyers and the very consumer unfriendly, downright draconian laws they are trying to ram through to get access to all our "metadata".
Very long way to go with that, but in some situations yes, probably into the double digits of percentage by now. As the coal power generation units age that replacement will increase. Steel production is down (economic hassles) so coal use is down in that area where natural gas does not work because the coal is needed for a chemical reaction as well as the heat.