They're not making it clear if they are talking about 10,000 seperate and definable accesses to sites or the usual logging of multiple log entries for one page as it calls each graphic on the page. So 10,000 unique sites or 1000 graphic intensive sites?.
Looks like the old bean counters numbers game to me, give the figure without any qualifying parameters to enable establishment of a factual opinion. Easier to scaremonger and paint as bad a picture as possible to justify the "service"
configure your mailserver to exclude executable/potentially malicious file types for internal and external mail. While this won't prevent someone opening an attachment in a web based email account you don't control, it should limit the infection to a single PC rather than the whole place. Nothing will solve the user stupidity problem completely but it can be minimised at least.
Slashdot Mirror
They're not making it clear if they are talking about 10,000 seperate and definable accesses to sites or the usual logging of multiple log entries for one page as it calls each graphic on the page. So 10,000 unique sites or 1000 graphic intensive sites?. Looks like the old bean counters numbers game to me, give the figure without any qualifying parameters to enable establishment of a factual opinion. Easier to scaremonger and paint as bad a picture as possible to justify the "service"
if the actually paid what they were supposed to then perhaps, try this
yep they come up with works of genius like CAN-SPAM ... I can hardly wait to see what they manage next
configure your mailserver to exclude executable /potentially malicious file types for internal and external mail. While this won't prevent someone opening an attachment in a web based email account you don't control, it should limit the infection to a single PC rather than the whole place. Nothing will solve the user stupidity problem completely but it can be minimised at least.