The kernel of truth in your criticism is that they claimed to have audited their own code over a year ago, in a highly publicized move. This raises doubts about how thorough that was, since MSBlast affects even their most recent release, Server 2003.
Clearly this is not the best advertisement!
The kernel of truth in your criticism is that they claimed to have audited their own code over a year ago, in a highly publicized move. This raises doubts about how thorough that was, since MSBlast affects even their most recent release, Server 2003.
Now I gotta know what it was renamed to...