FTA: "The Ministry of Public Administration and Security is set to report to ruling party lawmakers about comprehensive measures to protect personal information online, including abolishing the real-name registration system, Yonhap news agency said."
Also, this says the system was in effect since 2007:)
Creepy concidence hre. I had just finished wathing "National Geographic Explorer: 24 Hours After Asteroid Impact" documentary seconds ago when I loaded slashdot to see this story. I recommend that documentary btw; it really dwarfed all my previous imagination of what might have occured...
[It has always claimed that 'no-707' theory is false and is a booby-trap for conspiracy theorists, and a disinformation that may have been intentionally flamed up by the government to cover-up other evidence (thus when they finally prove that a 707 indeed crashed Pentagon, they would have practically discredited all the other theories by the nature of human psychology.]
Video of the Pentagon Attack: What is the Government Hiding? by Jim Hoffman
Version 0.9, May 16, 2006
Today, the DOD released two videos from Pentagon security cameras, through JudicialWatch.org. One of the videos includes the five frames leaked in 2002. The new frames, including several from a different camera, add almost nothing to the body of public evidence about the Pentagon attack on 9/11/01. Since the new videos don't show an airplane, they promise to fuel debates about what hit the Pentagon, rather than put them to rest.
The US government has for years refused to release video evidence that might undermine the popularity of no-Boeing theories. Today's release did not include video recordings from nearby businesses seized by the FBI within minutes of the attack.
Judicial Watch's Freedom of Information Act Request, filed on December 14, 2004, is similar to another request by different plaintifs, documented at Flight77.info. Both sought to obtain all of the camera recordings of the attack, including those from other Pentagon security cameras, ones seized from the Sheraton National Hotel and Nexcomm/Citgo gas station, and those managed by the Virginia Department of Transportation. The Pentagon had refused to release its recordings before today, claiming they were "part of an ongoing investigation involving Zacarias Moussaoui."
Most people who have heard of challenges to the official account (that cells of al Qaeda operatives were solely responsible for the attack) have heard of the theory that the Pentagon was not hit by a jetliner. The theory has been in circulation since early 2002, with the Hunt the Boeing website and Thierry Meyssan's Big Lie and Le Pentagate. The "no-Boeing" theories, which come in small-plane, missile, and truck bomb, variants, have flourished in the vacuum of video evidence, and served as a straw man with which to smear all challenges to the official account of the attack.
The refusal of authorities to release video evidence has been cited by supporters of Pentagon no-jetliner theories as evidence that Flight 77 wasn't there. If the government has proof that Flight 77 hit the Pentagon, why doesn't it make it public? Perhaps because it serves the cover-up to keep the sideshow debate about what hit the Pentagon going. In 2004, I suggested that the question of what hit the Pentagon was a huge distraction. Analysis of physical evidence of the crash shows that what's known of the damage and debris fits the crash of Flight 77.
Today Mike Berger was interviewed on ABCNews.com for the story New Tape Stirs Up 9/11 Conspiracy Theories. Rather than take the opportunity point out that the no-Boeing theory is a distraction, Berger stated:
Four-and-a-half years later, we still don't have definitive proof that a plane hit that building.
Mike Berger may not have grasped the implications of saying there is not proof that a plane hit the Pentagon, but it necessarily implies the following:
1. That the scores of accounts of a large plane are either faked or coerced.
2. That the damage to the Pentagon, including an approximately 100-foot-wide expanse of punctured facade walls on the first floor, were somehow produced by a means other than a plane.
3. That fires that smelled like burning jet fuel, running about 200 feet across the facade of the Pentagon, were prod
very good point! Me and my friends were using x-headers for a huge list of 'sensitive' words (including god, attack, terrorist, president, kill etc.) on every message we have sent back in the old dayz. I think since then I've owned a big special cluster within the records of the Echelon;)
Slashdot Mirror
Read it here: http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/world/2011-08/11/content_13095102.htm
:)
FTA: "The Ministry of Public Administration and Security is set to report to ruling party lawmakers about comprehensive measures to protect personal information online, including abolishing the real-name registration system, Yonhap news agency said."
Also, this says the system was in effect since 2007
Creepy concidence hre. I had just finished wathing "National Geographic Explorer: 24 Hours After Asteroid Impact" documentary seconds ago when I loaded slashdot to see this story. I recommend that documentary btw; it really dwarfed all my previous imagination of what might have occured...
perfect quote! it sounds even more perfect considered the person who has said it.
[It has always claimed that 'no-707' theory is false and is a booby-trap for conspiracy theorists, and a disinformation that may have been intentionally flamed up by the government to cover-up other evidence (thus when they finally prove that a 707 indeed crashed Pentagon, they would have practically discredited all the other theories by the nature of human psychology.]
Video of the Pentagon Attack: What is the Government Hiding?
by Jim Hoffman
Version 0.9, May 16, 2006
Today, the DOD released two videos from Pentagon security cameras, through JudicialWatch.org. One of the videos includes the five frames leaked in 2002. The new frames, including several from a different camera, add almost nothing to the body of public evidence about the Pentagon attack on 9/11/01. Since the new videos don't show an airplane, they promise to fuel debates about what hit the Pentagon, rather than put them to rest.
The US government has for years refused to release video evidence that might undermine the popularity of no-Boeing theories. Today's release did not include video recordings from nearby businesses seized by the FBI within minutes of the attack.
Judicial Watch's Freedom of Information Act Request, filed on December 14, 2004, is similar to another request by different plaintifs, documented at Flight77.info. Both sought to obtain all of the camera recordings of the attack, including those from other Pentagon security cameras, ones seized from the Sheraton National Hotel and Nexcomm/Citgo gas station, and those managed by the Virginia Department of Transportation. The Pentagon had refused to release its recordings before today, claiming they were "part of an ongoing investigation involving Zacarias Moussaoui."
Most people who have heard of challenges to the official account (that cells of al Qaeda operatives were solely responsible for the attack) have heard of the theory that the Pentagon was not hit by a jetliner. The theory has been in circulation since early 2002, with the Hunt the Boeing website and Thierry Meyssan's Big Lie and Le Pentagate. The "no-Boeing" theories, which come in small-plane, missile, and truck bomb, variants, have flourished in the vacuum of video evidence, and served as a straw man with which to smear all challenges to the official account of the attack.
The refusal of authorities to release video evidence has been cited by supporters of Pentagon no-jetliner theories as evidence that Flight 77 wasn't there. If the government has proof that Flight 77 hit the Pentagon, why doesn't it make it public? Perhaps because it serves the cover-up to keep the sideshow debate about what hit the Pentagon going. In 2004, I suggested that the question of what hit the Pentagon was a huge distraction. Analysis of physical evidence of the crash shows that what's known of the damage and debris fits the crash of Flight 77.
Today Mike Berger was interviewed on ABCNews.com for the story New Tape Stirs Up 9/11 Conspiracy Theories. Rather than take the opportunity point out that the no-Boeing theory is a distraction, Berger stated:
Four-and-a-half years later, we still don't have definitive proof that a plane hit that building.
Mike Berger may not have grasped the implications of saying there is not proof that a plane hit the Pentagon, but it necessarily implies the following:
1. That the scores of accounts of a large plane are either faked or coerced.
2. That the damage to the Pentagon, including an approximately 100-foot-wide expanse of punctured facade walls on the first floor, were somehow produced by a means other than a plane.
3. That fires that smelled like burning jet fuel, running about 200 feet across the facade of the Pentagon, were prod
Where is Stardust now?
very good point! Me and my friends were using x-headers for a huge list of 'sensitive' words (including god, attack, terrorist, president, kill etc.) on every message we have sent back in the old dayz. I think since then I've owned a big special cluster within the records of the Echelon ;)
Actually, gmail does not allow usernames smaller than 6 characters (I think it's a good move).
...and a review is here:
http://miscoranda.com/102