I've got a Tandy TX 1000 running Dos 6.22, I don't really use it for much other than to play some old games. The oldest hardware that I actualy use is the CD-ROM that I took from an old Compaq Persario that had a Pentium 133.
It seems to me that claiming that a P2P service is responsible for copyright infringement is like claiming that a photo-copier is responsible for the same crime. While a device is capable of assisting somebody in breaking the law, the device is not what broke the law.
Slashdot Mirror
I've got a Tandy TX 1000 running Dos 6.22, I don't really use it for much other than to play some old games. The oldest hardware that I actualy use is the CD-ROM that I took from an old Compaq Persario that had a Pentium 133.
Ford's Crown Victoria had this also, I think it was a '92 that I saw it in
It seems to me that claiming that a P2P service is responsible for copyright infringement is like claiming that a photo-copier is responsible for the same crime. While a device is capable of assisting somebody in breaking the law, the device is not what broke the law.