The app/rootkit intercepts and delays "display" of the text for 30 seconds.
OK, but impossible, given that I have two 3rd party SMS apps, and they get root SMS capability, so one of them will display it instantly, even with your app "intercepting" them.
Send the web page you were one and the last 50 characters or you typed to a remote server with the SMS confirmation.
Ah, but I said I'm logging in to the bank site on a separate computer. So your attack will get them a mobile porn site or whatever and a code that's useless to them.
I'm pretty sure a wire transfer can be done in 30 seconds.
None of my banks will process a "wire transfer" without written authorization in person with ID. I can do a funds transfer (that isn't an actual "wire transfer") but the recipients are limited, domestic and 100% traceable.
Won't even show up on the account web page until the next business day most of the time.
A non-wire funds transfer is instant. A wire transfer is processed overnight.
You don't even know how banking works, and have the idea for the best app ever. Why don't you start working on it?
That's why homeschoolers learn "better". The parents don't end school at 3 (or whenever school ends for the day). School is 24/7. If every parent did that with their public school student, then there'd be no complaints about the quality of a public school education.
The biggest problem with public schools is the parents who assume everything the child needs to learn they learn while in class.
I don't think the abolition of a long summer break has anything to do with your delusions. It has to do with a more steady schedule is good for learning.
an app that forwards the credentials to a third party that can use this to access the system.
So if I'm sending a bank transfer, I have to log in to the bank site, usually on a separate computer. The bank sends me an SMS with a one-time-use code to put in for verification. If that code is made public, there's no use for it. It doesn't hurt me if everyone on the planet can see it. They'd need to have already hacked my bank account for it to matter. And the moment I use it, it's useless. And if they do hack my account, the texts to me that give me the confirmation code will get me to call my bank real fast.
In a practical sense, it's impossible for an app that re-sends all bank confirmation codes to a central server to be of any use to anyone.
Then they don't need "full" but there's nothing between "none" and "full" for them to pick from. "only these 3 app servers" would be sufficient, but there's no way for an app to restrict itself in permissions to 3 servers, or for the phone to enforce it. So in practice, any security hole in any app would allow the phone to be used as an open proxy, with "permissions" allowing it all.
There needs to be more granularity allowed.
I also love when I'm offline and an offline game won't start because if it can't load the adds, the offline game won't run.
Now sure, we PV/Solar Thermal over Southern California, Nevada, New Mexico, Arizona and South/Central Texas. Maybe that's enough capacity. Maybe. Plus a few trillion batteries that need to be replaced every 5-10 years.
You are just a troll. Chemical storage is one of the worst options available. It's just the only one the trolls claim when whining about it.
Come back when you have a realistic answer.
For PV, you'd need no new land. Just doing rooves with souther exposure would meet your requirements. All the wind off shore. zero dedicated land needed. That's realistic. You just don't like it.
15 years after school, I was the only one in the IT department that could do wireless. The algebra of doing a link budget was beyond everyone else, two of whom were still in college. I think it was mainly the logarithms that scared everyone off.
Why must they be clustered? One month off every 2 (2 on one off, repeat 3 times) seems to have the same, if not more time off than they have now. The difference is that there is no long summer that they spend the first 1/4 of every school year repeating for those who forgot the previous 10 years of schooling.
DD-WRT has caught back up. Last time I looked, they didn't have support for newer ones, the equivalent of ASUS RT-AC68U. But now, they do have support for that one, and the others I checked. Though, as the Asus supports being a media server and print server out of the box, as well as some advanced security features, I'm not sure what I need DD-WRT for, compared to when I first used it, in the WRT54G days.
What are you talking about? "Doable" isn't the same as "doable tomorrow, with no spending or investment". With sufficient investment (no more than we've spent on investment in oil and nuclear), we could be 100% renewable. Yes, it will take time. That doesn't mean it isn't doable.
If everyone rolled out v6 by now, we'd have no Skype, and the last ISPs that stayed v4 would have all our customers and idiots like you would be out of a job because you didn't support Skype in the most economical model.
No, I'm not going to punish my customers to appease your religion of v6. When v6 compatibility hurts the customer, the ISPs should reject it. So long as Skype doesn't do v6, v4 only is the *best* solution for performance and cost for the customer. Anything else is punishing the customer for your religion.
Router performance should ultimately go up by quite a bit.
How can it when it has to do all that for v4 as well? I found a reference to 80% of sites being v4 only (2009, so old, but not that old). So 80% of your resources are spend on v4, and you have to have a separate process for v6. I've looked and I've never seen anything anywhere, other than you, that claimed dual-stack was less resource intensive for CPE/end-user than v4 only. Everything I've seen indicated that dual-stack would have been used more extensively if it wasn't more resource intensive than v4 only.
My preference would be to do v6 only (customer and core), with NAT64 for the 20%of the Internet that's not v6, but that'll work for getting to almost everything on the planet but Skype.
There's cost in buying and managing v4 addresses, and dual-stack doesn't fix that. So v4 only is "cheaper" and easier than dual stack.
As soon as MS fixes Skype, I'll be pushing for v6 only, but if they don't put out a new version this month, I'll be forced to run v4 only and maybe eventually dual-stack for a transition period. But dual-stack indefinitely for no reason than a religious affiliation with v6 is stupid and wasteful.
I blame Skype. They are the *only* roadblock to v6 at this point. No other popular protocol/app is hard-wired to v4-only.
A fair number of them only signed those contracts because they really didn't have a choice.
And they treated their employees like shit so often they had no choice but to unionize. Going back to the first "they had no choice" it was the corporation that screwed it up. But yet you hold them blameless.
Toyota manufactures in the USA without UAW "interference", why? Because they don't treat their workers like shit.
The American people collectively have screwed their own country up with a lot of this crap.
"Their" not "our"? Where are you? What country do you claim as "home"?
The corporations screwed it up. They screwed it up so bad, formal aggressive criminal unions were the *only* reasonable response from the workers. Then, once the collevtive workers discussed with the collective owners on an almost even basis, the unions are to blame for every fault, and the management to "blame" for every success.
Right, because industry is collapsing everywhere in the US...
How are the steel mills in PA doing? All closed, but they didn't monoculture the place, so it doesn't show as much blight as Detroit?
Industry (large manufacture of end user products) is collapsing everywhere in the US. Apple, the most profitable manufacturer in the USA manufacturers in China. Dell did "final assembly" in the US, but all the parts were made overseas, and now they even do final assembly overseas as well.
The American makers made sure that if they went down, they'd take Detroit with them. It was a deliberate act of sabotage, used as political leverage when they wanted to make demands of the city or state. They won. They got everything they ever wanted, and still ran their companies into the ground. Unions were irrelevant to that incompetence.
But some insane people would rather blame unions than open their eyes to the corruption of Corporate America.
You aren't listening. v4 only reaches *everything* dual stack does. Dual stack takes more resources and complexity. Therefore, the better technical solution is single stack, v4 *only*.
But forcing the NFL to give their content away for free (i.e. abolishing the blackout rule)
Abolishing the blackout rule will do no such thing. The FCC used to enforce a private blackout rule against the NFL (at the NFL's request). Now, the NFL is free to enforce the rule themselves. This is more freedom for the NFL, not less.
It was spelled out in TFS, you didn't even need to read TFA.
Slashdot Mirror
The app/rootkit intercepts and delays "display" of the text for 30 seconds.
OK, but impossible, given that I have two 3rd party SMS apps, and they get root SMS capability, so one of them will display it instantly, even with your app "intercepting" them.
Send the web page you were one and the last 50 characters or you typed to a remote server with the SMS confirmation.
Ah, but I said I'm logging in to the bank site on a separate computer. So your attack will get them a mobile porn site or whatever and a code that's useless to them.
I'm pretty sure a wire transfer can be done in 30 seconds.
None of my banks will process a "wire transfer" without written authorization in person with ID. I can do a funds transfer (that isn't an actual "wire transfer") but the recipients are limited, domestic and 100% traceable.
Won't even show up on the account web page until the next business day most of the time.
A non-wire funds transfer is instant. A wire transfer is processed overnight.
You don't even know how banking works, and have the idea for the best app ever. Why don't you start working on it?
That's why homeschoolers learn "better". The parents don't end school at 3 (or whenever school ends for the day). School is 24/7. If every parent did that with their public school student, then there'd be no complaints about the quality of a public school education.
The biggest problem with public schools is the parents who assume everything the child needs to learn they learn while in class.
I don't think the abolition of a long summer break has anything to do with your delusions. It has to do with a more steady schedule is good for learning.
Why aren't children getting uninterrupted sleep and free activity the other 9 months?
So, did both of you quit to raise your children? Who schooled them, and what was their income over that time?
Well, wireless in practice runs well below listed speed. Also, it improves service with multiple active devices at the same time.
No account, but service not disabled. They didn't try the same with a Galaxy S5 or iPhone5.
They snooped the phone out of the box to see what was sent. Have them try that again with a Galaxy S5 and iPhone5 and see the results.
Yes, new smartphones call home. The question of "does this do it more than anyone else?" wasn't answered.
an app that forwards the credentials to a third party that can use this to access the system.
So if I'm sending a bank transfer, I have to log in to the bank site, usually on a separate computer. The bank sends me an SMS with a one-time-use code to put in for verification. If that code is made public, there's no use for it. It doesn't hurt me if everyone on the planet can see it. They'd need to have already hacked my bank account for it to matter. And the moment I use it, it's useless. And if they do hack my account, the texts to me that give me the confirmation code will get me to call my bank real fast.
In a practical sense, it's impossible for an app that re-sends all bank confirmation codes to a central server to be of any use to anyone.
Then they don't need "full" but there's nothing between "none" and "full" for them to pick from. "only these 3 app servers" would be sufficient, but there's no way for an app to restrict itself in permissions to 3 servers, or for the phone to enforce it. So in practice, any security hole in any app would allow the phone to be used as an open proxy, with "permissions" allowing it all.
There needs to be more granularity allowed.
I also love when I'm offline and an offline game won't start because if it can't load the adds, the offline game won't run.
Now sure, we PV/Solar Thermal over Southern California, Nevada, New Mexico, Arizona and South/Central Texas. Maybe that's enough capacity. Maybe. Plus a few trillion batteries that need to be replaced every 5-10 years.
You are just a troll. Chemical storage is one of the worst options available. It's just the only one the trolls claim when whining about it.
Come back when you have a realistic answer.
For PV, you'd need no new land. Just doing rooves with souther exposure would meet your requirements. All the wind off shore. zero dedicated land needed. That's realistic. You just don't like it.
15 years after school, I was the only one in the IT department that could do wireless. The algebra of doing a link budget was beyond everyone else, two of whom were still in college. I think it was mainly the logarithms that scared everyone off.
Why must they be clustered? One month off every 2 (2 on one off, repeat 3 times) seems to have the same, if not more time off than they have now. The difference is that there is no long summer that they spend the first 1/4 of every school year repeating for those who forgot the previous 10 years of schooling.
DD-WRT has caught back up. Last time I looked, they didn't have support for newer ones, the equivalent of ASUS RT-AC68U. But now, they do have support for that one, and the others I checked. Though, as the Asus supports being a media server and print server out of the box, as well as some advanced security features, I'm not sure what I need DD-WRT for, compared to when I first used it, in the WRT54G days.
What are you talking about? "Doable" isn't the same as "doable tomorrow, with no spending or investment". With sufficient investment (no more than we've spent on investment in oil and nuclear), we could be 100% renewable. Yes, it will take time. That doesn't mean it isn't doable.
If everyone rolled out v6 by now, we'd have no Skype, and the last ISPs that stayed v4 would have all our customers and idiots like you would be out of a job because you didn't support Skype in the most economical model.
No, I'm not going to punish my customers to appease your religion of v6. When v6 compatibility hurts the customer, the ISPs should reject it. So long as Skype doesn't do v6, v4 only is the *best* solution for performance and cost for the customer. Anything else is punishing the customer for your religion.
Nope. 100% renewable is perfectly doable.
Router performance should ultimately go up by quite a bit.
How can it when it has to do all that for v4 as well? I found a reference to 80% of sites being v4 only (2009, so old, but not that old). So 80% of your resources are spend on v4, and you have to have a separate process for v6. I've looked and I've never seen anything anywhere, other than you, that claimed dual-stack was less resource intensive for CPE/end-user than v4 only. Everything I've seen indicated that dual-stack would have been used more extensively if it wasn't more resource intensive than v4 only.
My preference would be to do v6 only (customer and core), with NAT64 for the 20%of the Internet that's not v6, but that'll work for getting to almost everything on the planet but Skype.
There's cost in buying and managing v4 addresses, and dual-stack doesn't fix that. So v4 only is "cheaper" and easier than dual stack.
As soon as MS fixes Skype, I'll be pushing for v6 only, but if they don't put out a new version this month, I'll be forced to run v4 only and maybe eventually dual-stack for a transition period. But dual-stack indefinitely for no reason than a religious affiliation with v6 is stupid and wasteful.
I blame Skype. They are the *only* roadblock to v6 at this point. No other popular protocol/app is hard-wired to v4-only.
A fair number of them only signed those contracts because they really didn't have a choice.
And they treated their employees like shit so often they had no choice but to unionize. Going back to the first "they had no choice" it was the corporation that screwed it up. But yet you hold them blameless.
Toyota manufactures in the USA without UAW "interference", why? Because they don't treat their workers like shit.
The American people collectively have screwed their own country up with a lot of this crap.
"Their" not "our"? Where are you? What country do you claim as "home"?
The corporations screwed it up. They screwed it up so bad, formal aggressive criminal unions were the *only* reasonable response from the workers. Then, once the collevtive workers discussed with the collective owners on an almost even basis, the unions are to blame for every fault, and the management to "blame" for every success.
Why?
Right, because industry is collapsing everywhere in the US...
How are the steel mills in PA doing? All closed, but they didn't monoculture the place, so it doesn't show as much blight as Detroit?
Industry (large manufacture of end user products) is collapsing everywhere in the US. Apple, the most profitable manufacturer in the USA manufacturers in China. Dell did "final assembly" in the US, but all the parts were made overseas, and now they even do final assembly overseas as well.
The American makers made sure that if they went down, they'd take Detroit with them. It was a deliberate act of sabotage, used as political leverage when they wanted to make demands of the city or state. They won. They got everything they ever wanted, and still ran their companies into the ground. Unions were irrelevant to that incompetence.
But some insane people would rather blame unions than open their eyes to the corruption of Corporate America.
You've said nothing to conflict with that fact.
Go study for your CCNA.
No thanks. My CCIE is sufficient.
Why do you hold the CEO's blameless for signing the contracts that doomed their companies?
Your blindness is more complete than mine. You have the suicide pact with corporations to rape and pillage.
But forcing the NFL to give their content away for free (i.e. abolishing the blackout rule)
Abolishing the blackout rule will do no such thing. The FCC used to enforce a private blackout rule against the NFL (at the NFL's request). Now, the NFL is free to enforce the rule themselves. This is more freedom for the NFL, not less.
It was spelled out in TFS, you didn't even need to read TFA.
I'm not sure how that's relevant to my post.
Okay, so long as you admit that you're irrational on the subject and simply want unions for their own sake.
I never said I wanted them. You are making up shit. Why?
If you actually think unions are utterly blameless and have a completely undeserved bad reputation then fine. Live in that fantasy world.
I never said they were blameless. Why are you lying again? It's not like people can scroll up and see that I never said what you are lying about.
anti-union = lying asshole. I couldn't even get past your second sentence without giving up from the number of lies you've told.