This is sort of a mute point anyway. Since in order for something to be a binding legal document in the United States the signees must be aged over 18.
90% of all the species that have ever existed are extinct. Basically human arrogance, once again, wants to grab nature by the short hairs and tell her what's what. So someone explain to me why it is okay to clone an extinct animal but not okay to clone something that already has a population in the billions?!
90% of all the species that have ever existed are extinct. Basically human arrogance, once again, wants to grab nature by the short hairs and tell her what's what. So someone explain to me why it is okay to clone an extinct animal but not okay to clone something that already exsists in the billions?!
Slashdot Mirror
This is sort of a mute point anyway. Since in order for something to be a binding legal document in the United States the signees must be aged over 18.
90% of all the species that have ever existed are extinct. Basically human arrogance, once again, wants to grab nature by the short hairs and tell her what's what. So someone explain to me why it is okay to clone an extinct animal but not okay to clone something that already has a population in the billions?!
90% of all the species that have ever existed are extinct. Basically human arrogance, once again, wants to grab nature by the short hairs and tell her what's what. So someone explain to me why it is okay to clone an extinct animal but not okay to clone something that already exsists in the billions?!