You're snobbish hatred of a language that's really Not That Bad is indcative of the fact that you are not "A Real Programmer".
Some very powerful things have been done with visual basic, and the true test of a "Real Programmer" is doing those Powerful Things on time, underbudget, and in Good Working Condition regardless of the environment of choice for the application.
Notice my hideous but Meaning Laden usage of capitalization. While i don't believe that a capitalization scheme should be enforced by the compiler, i do appreciate having it as a tool to enforce coding standard schemes.
Better layout and design would eliminate the problem for lower-end clients and turn-around time.
Please explain this. It's just stated, but i can't see it being a true statement. Please humor me provide some reasoning behind such a statement.
Removing ECMAScript-based validation would lighten the page for the same users.
By an amount that is idiotically negligable, especially in comparison to a server round trip.
It would be less likely to break for all users as well.
Superficially true. Well written javascript degrades well though and won't impinge on usability.
Should the operation of your pages depend on javascript? No. But i'd rather have them depending on javascript then CSS unless i get to specifically target a browser.
1. The validation continues in the flow of the process.
and validation will continue in the flow of the process anyway. You use javascript to prevent a server roundtrip if possible and do the server side validation anyway.
2. It calls out specific issues explicitly, in line with the field.
Javascript can to, and server side script can fail to do this. This is a design/implementation issue.
3. The other method doesn't work with ECMAScript disabled.
Irrelevent. You're using validation on both ends. Where is this hardon against javascript you seem to have acquired come from anyway?
Hans Blix didn't say any such thing until well after the fact. At the time he seemed reather blase on the subject, additionally, he firmly and repetedly stated that Iraq was hiding things from them, and were clearly in violation of UN resolutions. The UN resolutions themselves were sufficient to go to war (again) in the first place.
Insurance Companies are still running mainframe systems to track your annuities and policies that have been under active development and support since the 1960's.
Systems like lifecomm, all writen in assembly are still worked on.
I crave a simple gui. The skins for mplayer suck. i want 1 window. 1. Does any one remember the zen of windows media player 7? 1 window, with unobtrusive and simple controls. No nasty borders, no ugly hard to use skins, no craptacular multiple window where is the widget to make it stop hunting garbage; no how the fuck to i open another file from here? confusion.
It all depends on whare you're doing with said computer. Alot of IBM computers end up in medical and labratory equipment. There is an IBM AT that has been running since 1990 or some shit like that in a Du Pont ACA III+ or something like that at the christiana medical center.
Youre half-life box might not be that important, but blood gas analyisers, sample data collectors and other things, are.
there is a chance, however small (or not-small, I can't say, I've no clue)- that Bush had something to do with the Aral Sea disappearing.
I think, that as a scientist, you can simply think for a few minutes, and you'll be able to guess with quite a lot of certainty that it's a very small chance that bush had anything at all to do with the disappearence of the aral sea.
delphi is a _well thought out__ (unlike c++) oo extention to pascal, which is basically just really really verbose c. It would follow that they would be similar.
However, it has some features distinctly different from delphi's that are very interesting, and make it unique in it's own right ant not "just another (blah blah blah)".
Creatin actually makes you work much harder, in a number of ways, but one of them is by causing water to be retained in the muscle, making each rep expend more energy, and work the muscle harder.
You will absolutely feel it in one day, especially if you work out regularly, as you're regular work out will wreck you completely.
As for your comments on the names: Their brand names and brand names never were claimed to be interesting. Penguin Computing? Does that mean it was built by flightless birds in antartica?
And he's correct about the dextros, and he provides that information with the warning you so gleefully yack off on.
The other guy who responded to me actually clarified my point.
it's multi-serial, multiple serial connections running in parallel. A datagram gets chunked at the processor, the chunks cross the parallel serial lines, and are reconstructed at the recieving end. if you're using TCP/IP, just go by packet.
I'm sorry, but that doesn't make much sense. Interactions between data lines can easily be avoided by simple spacing or shielding. Handling data on each line is trivial as well.
Up the serial speed as much as you want, and you can still up it with a parallel interconnect.
Slashdot Mirror
Yes, but you are no longer practicing XP -- Thus, your project will, infact, fail -- because you were not following The Rules.
Wheee
Uh, are you sure it wasn't tintin as in the old school mud client ( a version still exists at www.wintin.org )...
just a thought, spose i'll have to read the book to find out...
I actually registered a copy of enable Virtual Desktop, one of the best vdm's and pagers out there for any operating system as far as i'm concerned.
Wtf, is there a way for us to comment on the patent by sending all this prior art somewhere?
-T
You're snobbish hatred of a language that's really Not That Bad is indcative of the fact that you are not "A Real Programmer".
Some very powerful things have been done with visual basic, and the true test of a "Real Programmer" is doing those Powerful Things on time, underbudget, and in Good Working Condition regardless of the environment of choice for the application.
Notice my hideous but Meaning Laden usage of capitalization. While i don't believe that a capitalization scheme should be enforced by the compiler, i do appreciate having it as a tool to enforce coding standard schemes.
Smurfy,
-T
Better layout and design would eliminate the problem for lower-end clients and turn-around time.
Please explain this. It's just stated, but i can't see it being a true statement. Please humor me provide some reasoning behind such a statement.
Removing ECMAScript-based validation would lighten the page for the same users.
By an amount that is idiotically negligable, especially in comparison to a server round trip.
It would be less likely to break for all users as well.
Superficially true. Well written javascript degrades well though and won't impinge on usability.
Should the operation of your pages depend on javascript? No. But i'd rather have them depending on javascript then CSS unless i get to specifically target a browser.
-T
This isn't a 1 vs the other value proposition.
1. The validation continues in the flow of the process.
and validation will continue in the flow of the process anyway. You use javascript to prevent a server roundtrip if possible and do the server side validation anyway.
2. It calls out specific issues explicitly, in line with the field.
Javascript can to, and server side script can fail to do this. This is a design/implementation issue.
3. The other method doesn't work with ECMAScript disabled.
Irrelevent. You're using validation on both ends. Where is this hardon against javascript you seem to have acquired come from anyway?
-T
Hans Blix didn't say any such thing until well after the fact. At the time he seemed reather blase on the subject, additionally, he firmly and repetedly stated that Iraq was hiding things from them, and were clearly in violation of UN resolutions. The UN resolutions themselves were sufficient to go to war (again) in the first place.
Insurance Companies are still running mainframe systems to track your annuities and policies that have been under active development and support since the 1960's.
Systems like lifecomm, all writen in assembly are still worked on.
-L
Which is a nice set of convient theorys that back some politcal agenda you must have, except that...
Since 1991, Iraq could only trade oil for food, and were under severe econimic sanctions.
They couldn't engage in the currency transactions.. they couldn't trade oil in money.
-t
Uh, webmin is perl, not php.
what the hell are you talking about?
-L
I crave a simple gui. The skins for mplayer suck.
i want 1 window. 1. Does any one remember the zen of windows media player 7? 1 window, with unobtrusive and simple controls. No nasty borders, no ugly hard to use skins, no craptacular multiple window where is the widget to make it stop hunting garbage; no how the fuck to i open another file from here? confusion.
Sigh.
-T
Please click on the link, and READ before you spout off in such an idiotic manor.
Y is not an extension of X. It is not adding more features or more bloat to X. It is not, X.
It is not anything you list, actually.
Oh know, I've just been eaten by a troll, wow, i'm slow today.
And if his Y takes off, it can replace X withoutht causing you any problems at all at all.
I'm not really sure, in truth,how your post is relevent to what's going on, and i'm a bit put off by your sarcastic whine about gamers etc.
All to be followed by a (rather poor) backhanded attack on windows. Except this isn't about Windows with a capital w.
In short, what are you talking about, and who on earth modded you up?
Except for the top 5 or so, which read, several times, just to make sure that my bullshit meter wasn't broken or something.
It all depends on whare you're doing with said computer. Alot of IBM computers end up in medical and labratory equipment. There is an IBM AT that has been running since 1990 or some shit like that in a Du Pont ACA III+ or something like that at the christiana medical center.
Youre half-life box might not be that important, but blood gas analyisers, sample data collectors and other things, are.
there is a chance, however small (or not-small, I can't say, I've no clue)- that Bush had something to do with the Aral Sea disappearing. I think, that as a scientist, you can simply think for a few minutes, and you'll be able to guess with quite a lot of certainty that it's a very small chance that bush had anything at all to do with the disappearence of the aral sea.
wow, i'm brilliant. fucking <'s, mutter.
comment should be:
yah, but that order can be important. loops make it the most obvious, if you do
i = 0;
while( i < 3 ) {
do_stuff(i++);
}
you do_stuff() to values of i in the set [0, 1, 2 ] where as if you did
i = 0;
while( i < 3 ) {
do_stuff( ++i );
}
you only do_stuff() to values of i in the set [1, 2 ].
yah, but that order can be important. loops make it the most obvious, if you do
i = 0;
while( i do_stuff() to values of i in the set [0, 1, 2 ] where as if you did
i = 0;
while( i do_stuff() to values of i in the set [1, 2 ].
yes, execpt those are not all equivalent statements.
X++, x+=1 and x=x+1 are all "roughly" equivalent, but they have different meanings.
++x is a different creature all together.
Try changing all your for loops from stuff like
for(int i = 0; i someval; i++ ) {
to
for(int i = 0; i someval; ++i ) {
and see what kind of mess it makes all over your room.
And you might not be a troll, but then again, you say such trollish things.
Anyway, if it wouldn't scale with that little code and a "hefty server", then you did not write code with running.
I imagine someone else is writing you're ruby code for you as well and all your problems are gone because you're not creating them anymore.
delphi is a _well thought out__ (unlike c++) oo extention to pascal, which is basically just really really verbose c. It would follow that they would be similar.
However, it has some features distinctly different from delphi's that are very interesting, and make it unique in it's own right ant not "just another (blah blah blah)".
It got moderated up because it is informative.
Creatin actually makes you work much harder, in a number of ways, but one of them is by causing water to be retained in the muscle, making each rep expend more energy, and work the muscle harder.
You will absolutely feel it in one day, especially if you work out regularly, as you're regular work out will wreck you completely.
As for your comments on the names: Their brand names and brand names never were claimed to be interesting. Penguin Computing? Does that mean it was built by flightless birds in antartica?
And he's correct about the dextros, and he provides that information with the warning you so gleefully yack off on.
Go home pasty.
I think that you are a massive tard.
I had to wait 20 seconds to post this.
*twiddle*
I still think you are a tard.
The other guy who responded to me actually clarified my point.
it's multi-serial, multiple serial connections running in parallel. A datagram gets chunked at the processor, the chunks cross the parallel serial lines, and are reconstructed at the recieving end. if you're using TCP/IP, just go by packet.
I'm sorry, but that doesn't make much sense. Interactions between data lines can easily be avoided by simple spacing or shielding. Handling data on each line is trivial as well.
Up the serial speed as much as you want, and you can still up it with a parallel interconnect.