Another thing to watch for is that when you stop drinking is not when the alcohol stops being absorbed. Little alcohol gets absorbed in the stomach and is mostly absorbed by the intestines. So not only is there time involed with it getting to the intestines, if you eat while drinking, the stomach can delay allowing it to pass into the intestines until it is ready to pass the food into it.
The cops know about that too and will often wait until the last minute possible to test you in order to secure a DUI in some areas. If you get pulled over, don't tell then you ate in the last four hours else your BAC could continye to rise while they wait to test you as the stomach opens and the trapped alcohol rushes into the intestines where it is absorbed rapidly.
Someone who is drunk at 2am will likely still have a high bac at 8am and possibly still be at or over the legal limit by noon.
I'm not talking about the casual drinker with 2 or 3 drinks. Its the heavy drinkers this can happen with. Often they feel fine or not drunk when this can happen. If i wasn't posting from my phone i could give some links. 8 hours of sleep isn't always enough- especially if you ate while drinking.
I completely disagree. Rights do not need to be granted by a God or gods just as morals can come about without them too.
As for creative interpretations, that us just completely wrong. The problem is as you twist to your enjoyment, someone else is twisting to your detriment. A constitution limiting government prevents that for a set or subset of freedoms we as a society hold dear. What made the US great for the longest of time was the fact that the government was subject to the people. Now it seems the people are subjects of the government. And when i saw subjects, i mean owned and controlled by the king or queen. We shouldn't need to beg permision to live life the way we want.
The courts have outlawed this in the past then someone said if they announce it, you are volunteering for the search by not going around it and they allowed it.
I agree with you. It isn't right and anyone wjo says drunks on the road justifies it doesn't know the facts. We are more likely dieing from slipping and falling around the house than we are from a drunk driver and no one is demanding the cops search every house or making living in one illegal.
Except that in the US, these rights are not granted by law, they exist regardless of it. The law is actually bared from violating them except in limited and specific ways. That is what is so important about a constitution and the need to change it rather than ignore it. It takes a lot more to change the constitution than it does to change a law.
So i see you are deflecting to attemped insults rather than substance. So answer a few things. What is in the bible that jehovas witnesses believe that catholics do not.
Where did the emporer get the stories, why do the jews have them, why have some of them been dated to hundreds of years before the emporer was alive (scientificaly no doubt).
Here is your problem, the lack of information does not mean the information does not exist nor does it mean something never happened. You act as if a tree fell in the woods and nobody was there to hear it, not only did it not make a sound but it also never happened. But i'm not even sure why you think you even need to change the subject let alone by using such completely flawed logic to do so. You started this my making assertion about what people who belive in jesus actually believe and now you are trying to ignore that supposition in order to claim jesus didn't exist in order to escape being wrong. And you do so while ignoring roman records about him that existed a couple hundred years before the emporer.
It would seem you still know nothing about the christian teachings. But i guess you read something on an atheist website created by someone suffering the same problem of ignorance that you do. I bet you think you are a doctor of religous studies now. Lol. You are cracking me up. Please continue to squirm.
Columbus ohio does the DUI road blocks too- not on the freeways but busy city streets. They announce the results on the news and it is always something like 3 arrests for alcohol or drug DUI and a couple for outstanding warrants (typically child support or failed to renew license related) out of 600-1000 cars stopped.
It is a complete invasion of privacy for the vast majority of people hassled by them. Of course the cops announce where the check points will be in order to get around 4th amendment issues. I don't even think they expect to catch anyone for DUI.
I don't think hypocrisy means what you think it means. I do know that nowhere ib the bible does it say you cannot kill and if it does, it is only because some idiot translation error. The originals talk about murder which is not the same.
That being said, outside of the cult groups that add to the bible, the differences in the Christian religion is mainly in dogma outside the bible and empasis differences on different verses. Like i said, context is needed to understand the words. NOBODY but outsiders who never bother with the meaning pick and chooses. The bible is just a book with the history of several covenants between man and God. We are under the last one where Jesus died for our sins. If something doesn't explicitly get covered there, then we look into the older covenants for guidence.
Btw, slavery and selling daughters was the jews not christians. It was never a teaching either outside of how to behave when doing it. You do know that Jesus was a jew right?
Thank you for illistrating my point which was that you don't know what the religion says rather just words in the bible.
Jesus might very well blow bin ladens head off with lasers. I could explain this better if i wasn't posting from my phone but jesus got violent at the temple market on the sabath. He cast demons from someone and forced them into pigs which where drowned.
Context is needed to understand that the words teach lessons not just orders. The rich man was not likely to enter heavan not because he was rich, but because he loved money more than God which in itself is against a commandment.
Whether you think it is a conspiracy or not doesn't change the very real facts that a country other than the US is why the cops are there. In fact, them not leaving sort of shows this independance from the US and lack of conspiracy. But well will never really know.
US law works much in the same way excep they extend it from with the country to entities of the country. The extension is somewhat limited to application of foreign laws.
I'll use use your example of shooting a gun across the border to illistrate. Suppose that bullet struck and kill an American on vacation in grmany. The US would claim jurisdiction and extend US law to the situation. But if Germany captures the suspect and plans on charging him, then the law of germany is looked at to determine if the justice system and penalties are comparible to US law. If so, it drops claims and allows the German process to servevas justice. If German law makes it a petty crime where the US makes it a felony(not exactly that standard but should be enough to understand the concept) then the US would claim juridiction and seek extradiction. Sometims the US even waives portions if pissible penalties like the death penalty in order to allow that to happen.
Now i said entities and not just persons. If the effect was against a US company or anything under US law, the same is true. This is why you saw Australian being extradicted for pirating software and the entire kim dot com bs.
They have had tribunals which would have given them many chances of stating their innocence or the mistakes of their captue and detainment. In fact, they had caused a number of people to habe their charges against them dropped and they had been released.
Unfortunately, there are a number of detainees who's country won't allow them back in so they are sort of stuck (unless somerhing happened i did't hear about). But we are prety confident at this stage on who was or wasn't picked up by mistake.
It dragged on not to give the troops something to do but because it wasn't a true war. It was a political war in which instead of conquoring the country, we attemped to overthrow its leaders and install ones friendly to us. Vietnam was much the same way except we tried to keep a quasi government friendly to us in power despite half the country recognizing another government (comunist).
It is a very dificult task to do and every time any nation has tried, it hasn't went well unless the other country was beaten into submission through real war tactics of conquoring it first.
Is there a difference between killing and murder? The guy lost control of his car and killed himself in the accident equating to the guy being a murderer sort of sounds silly. But hey, what do i know, i'm just a jesus freak and you seem to know more about it than i do. Can you explain to me about not supposed to be murdering in exodus where after moses got the commandments, the jews were told to kill everyone in a few of the wars they ended up in?
It is highly reasonably this is the truth. What he said was that there are no indictments yet and no warrants from the process. This is entirely likely to be the case specifically to avoid strengthening any amnesty claims and eventually allow some third party deportation eventually. Charges, if any, would likely wait until there is a chance of actually getting him. Remember, the officer only said as of now and specifically left the future open citing an unfinished grand jury process.
Australia never had fires before global warming? I must inform all the uni-professors about this as they seem to think there have been. Or you mean there haven't been as many in your life time and you are just now noticing them?
And those pesky third world countries that could have never survived this long without you caring over them. What will they ever do? I mean it isn't like Venice or Holland has any insight into this situation. It isn't like making buildings and islands is out of the question. Most worst case scenarios place the sea level rises at 2 to 5 feet over the next 90 or so years. It will be unpossible for anyone to do anything about it. Well, you can relax, most of them will be knocked off by typhoons and hurricanes that have never happened before global warming too. Or are you thinking of the Maldives who are not too poor to purchase another set of islands-
As for the Psychiatrist, I think maybe you should be the one seeking it. I see you completely ignored the part about saving money being a fallacy and instead went for the emotional arguments. That is either because you are a con artist who knows nothing purposed to fix climate change actually touches it or that you have been brainwashed into thinking anything in the name of it good. Either way, it not a sign of good mental health.
Listen, as long as the topic of global warming comes up and someone claims how they can save us all if we just raise taxes to force the majority of the population who aren't rich or privileged into the stone age with the hopes that someone will some day come up with a way to bring us back out, you can expect comments about it.
Unless the GP I was responding to is a puppet account of yours, you really do not need to bother yourself with this and can simply move along if you do not care for it. Just don't find a virgin to offer the volcanoes hoping to appease it as that doesn't work and a lot of/.ers might become overly frightened to find you looking for one.
You sure are an insightful boy. Do all your comment come with this kind of all knowing comfort?
So I thought they were talking about the volcanic activity around the arctic in the pacific and didn't realize it was on the other side of the world. DO you never make mistakes? Or do you always rush to be as insightful on your own? I mean seriously, you added nothing to the discussion, including pointing out where I was wrong. Even with me being wrong, I think/. is collectively dumber now that you posted with all your whit.
I do not think it is meant to stop anything like that. It is meant to inform users that something like that happened without running foul of the non-disclosure laws commonly associated with NSA letters and some warrants. It is mean to be a do nothing as the laws require and you are magically informed by the site owners doing nothing to inform you.
So a glass of water with ice cubes in it weighs more then a glass of water without ice?
Hmm.. do you know where I could get a scale precise enough to measure this effect on small scale so I can compare it with a larger glass of water called an Ocean?
Slashdot Mirror
Another thing to watch for is that when you stop drinking is not when the alcohol stops being absorbed. Little alcohol gets absorbed in the stomach and is mostly absorbed by the intestines. So not only is there time involed with it getting to the intestines, if you eat while drinking, the stomach can delay allowing it to pass into the intestines until it is ready to pass the food into it.
The cops know about that too and will often wait until the last minute possible to test you in order to secure a DUI in some areas. If you get pulled over, don't tell then you ate in the last four hours else your BAC could continye to rise while they wait to test you as the stomach opens and the trapped alcohol rushes into the intestines where it is absorbed rapidly.
Someone who is drunk at 2am will likely still have a high bac at 8am and possibly still be at or over the legal limit by noon.
I'm not talking about the casual drinker with 2 or 3 drinks. Its the heavy drinkers this can happen with. Often they feel fine or not drunk when this can happen. If i wasn't posting from my phone i could give some links. 8 hours of sleep isn't always enough- especially if you ate while drinking.
I completely disagree. Rights do not need to be granted by a God or gods just as morals can come about without them too.
As for creative interpretations, that us just completely wrong. The problem is as you twist to your enjoyment, someone else is twisting to your detriment. A constitution limiting government prevents that for a set or subset of freedoms we as a society hold dear. What made the US great for the longest of time was the fact that the government was subject to the people. Now it seems the people are subjects of the government. And when i saw subjects, i mean owned and controlled by the king or queen. We shouldn't need to beg permision to live life the way we want.
The courts have outlawed this in the past then someone said if they announce it, you are volunteering for the search by not going around it and they allowed it.
I agree with you. It isn't right and anyone wjo says drunks on the road justifies it doesn't know the facts. We are more likely dieing from slipping and falling around the house than we are from a drunk driver and no one is demanding the cops search every house or making living in one illegal.
Except that in the US, these rights are not granted by law, they exist regardless of it. The law is actually bared from violating them except in limited and specific ways. That is what is so important about a constitution and the need to change it rather than ignore it. It takes a lot more to change the constitution than it does to change a law.
So i see you are deflecting to attemped insults rather than substance. So answer a few things. What is in the bible that jehovas witnesses believe that catholics do not.
Where did the emporer get the stories, why do the jews have them, why have some of them been dated to hundreds of years before the emporer was alive (scientificaly no doubt).
Here is your problem, the lack of information does not mean the information does not exist nor does it mean something never happened. You act as if a tree fell in the woods and nobody was there to hear it, not only did it not make a sound but it also never happened. But i'm not even sure why you think you even need to change the subject let alone by using such completely flawed logic to do so. You started this my making assertion about what people who belive in jesus actually believe and now you are trying to ignore that supposition in order to claim jesus didn't exist in order to escape being wrong. And you do so while ignoring roman records about him that existed a couple hundred years before the emporer.
It would seem you still know nothing about the christian teachings. But i guess you read something on an atheist website created by someone suffering the same problem of ignorance that you do. I bet you think you are a doctor of religous studies now. Lol. You are cracking me up. Please continue to squirm.
Columbus ohio does the DUI road blocks too- not on the freeways but busy city streets. They announce the results on the news and it is always something like 3 arrests for alcohol or drug DUI and a couple for outstanding warrants (typically child support or failed to renew license related) out of 600-1000 cars stopped.
It is a complete invasion of privacy for the vast majority of people hassled by them. Of course the cops announce where the check points will be in order to get around 4th amendment issues. I don't even think they expect to catch anyone for DUI.
I don't think hypocrisy means what you think it means. I do know that nowhere ib the bible does it say you cannot kill and if it does, it is only because some idiot translation error. The originals talk about murder which is not the same.
That being said, outside of the cult groups that add to the bible, the differences in the Christian religion is mainly in dogma outside the bible and empasis differences on different verses. Like i said, context is needed to understand the words. NOBODY but outsiders who never bother with the meaning pick and chooses. The bible is just a book with the history of several covenants between man and God. We are under the last one where Jesus died for our sins. If something doesn't explicitly get covered there, then we look into the older covenants for guidence.
Btw, slavery and selling daughters was the jews not christians. It was never a teaching either outside of how to behave when doing it. You do know that Jesus was a jew right?
Thank you for illistrating my point which was that you don't know what the religion says rather just words in the bible.
Jesus might very well blow bin ladens head off with lasers. I could explain this better if i wasn't posting from my phone but jesus got violent at the temple market on the sabath. He cast demons from someone and forced them into pigs which where drowned.
Context is needed to understand that the words teach lessons not just orders. The rich man was not likely to enter heavan not because he was rich, but because he loved money more than God which in itself is against a commandment.
Whether you think it is a conspiracy or not doesn't change the very real facts that a country other than the US is why the cops are there. In fact, them not leaving sort of shows this independance from the US and lack of conspiracy. But well will never really know.
US law works much in the same way excep they extend it from with the country to entities of the country. The extension is somewhat limited to application of foreign laws.
I'll use use your example of shooting a gun across the border to illistrate. Suppose that bullet struck and kill an American on vacation in grmany. The US would claim jurisdiction and extend US law to the situation. But if Germany captures the suspect and plans on charging him, then the law of germany is looked at to determine if the justice system and penalties are comparible to US law. If so, it drops claims and allows the German process to servevas justice. If German law makes it a petty crime where the US makes it a felony(not exactly that standard but should be enough to understand the concept) then the US would claim juridiction and seek extradiction. Sometims the US even waives portions if pissible penalties like the death penalty in order to allow that to happen.
Now i said entities and not just persons. If the effect was against a US company or anything under US law, the same is true. This is why you saw Australian being extradicted for pirating software and the entire kim dot com bs.
They have had tribunals which would have given them many chances of stating their innocence or the mistakes of their captue and detainment. In fact, they had caused a number of people to habe their charges against them dropped and they had been released.
Unfortunately, there are a number of detainees who's country won't allow them back in so they are sort of stuck (unless somerhing happened i did't hear about). But we are prety confident at this stage on who was or wasn't picked up by mistake.
It dragged on not to give the troops something to do but because it wasn't a true war. It was a political war in which instead of conquoring the country, we attemped to overthrow its leaders and install ones friendly to us. Vietnam was much the same way except we tried to keep a quasi government friendly to us in power despite half the country recognizing another government (comunist).
It is a very dificult task to do and every time any nation has tried, it hasn't went well unless the other country was beaten into submission through real war tactics of conquoring it first.
Is there a difference between killing and murder? The guy lost control of his car and killed himself in the accident equating to the guy being a murderer sort of sounds silly. But hey, what do i know, i'm just a jesus freak and you seem to know more about it than i do. Can you explain to me about not supposed to be murdering in exodus where after moses got the commandments, the jews were told to kill everyone in a few of the wars they ended up in?
Why would they? They are not there due to the US. He is wanted for extradiction to one of the scandinavian countries over rape allegations.
It is highly reasonably this is the truth. What he said was that there are no indictments yet and no warrants from the process. This is entirely likely to be the case specifically to avoid strengthening any amnesty claims and eventually allow some third party deportation eventually. Charges, if any, would likely wait until there is a chance of actually getting him. Remember, the officer only said as of now and specifically left the future open citing an unfinished grand jury process.
Yeah, i got the poles mixed up and was thinking arctic sea ice. There are a large string of volcanoes involved in the arctic too.
Btw, thanks for pointing my mistake out without being a frothing idiot like others. Especially when i screwed up and prpbably deserved it.
You didn't find my reply humorous? Maybe you should get a funny bone.
Australia never had fires before global warming? I must inform all the uni-professors about this as they seem to think there have been. Or you mean there haven't been as many in your life time and you are just now noticing them?
And those pesky third world countries that could have never survived this long without you caring over them. What will they ever do? I mean it isn't like Venice or Holland has any insight into this situation. It isn't like making buildings and islands is out of the question. Most worst case scenarios place the sea level rises at 2 to 5 feet over the next 90 or so years. It will be unpossible for anyone to do anything about it. Well, you can relax, most of them will be knocked off by typhoons and hurricanes that have never happened before global warming too. Or are you thinking of the Maldives who are not too poor to purchase another set of islands-
As for the Psychiatrist, I think maybe you should be the one seeking it. I see you completely ignored the part about saving money being a fallacy and instead went for the emotional arguments. That is either because you are a con artist who knows nothing purposed to fix climate change actually touches it or that you have been brainwashed into thinking anything in the name of it good. Either way, it not a sign of good mental health.
Listen, as long as the topic of global warming comes up and someone claims how they can save us all if we just raise taxes to force the majority of the population who aren't rich or privileged into the stone age with the hopes that someone will some day come up with a way to bring us back out, you can expect comments about it.
Unless the GP I was responding to is a puppet account of yours, you really do not need to bother yourself with this and can simply move along if you do not care for it. Just don't find a virgin to offer the volcanoes hoping to appease it as that doesn't work and a lot of /.ers might become overly frightened to find you looking for one.
You sure are an insightful boy. Do all your comment come with this kind of all knowing comfort?
So I thought they were talking about the volcanic activity around the arctic in the pacific and didn't realize it was on the other side of the world. DO you never make mistakes? Or do you always rush to be as insightful on your own? I mean seriously, you added nothing to the discussion, including pointing out where I was wrong. Even with me being wrong, I think /. is collectively dumber now that you posted with all your whit.
forget my other reply. I completely misunderstood what you were saying.
I do not think it is meant to stop anything like that. It is meant to inform users that something like that happened without running foul of the non-disclosure laws commonly associated with NSA letters and some warrants. It is mean to be a do nothing as the laws require and you are magically informed by the site owners doing nothing to inform you.
Have no fear, superman also has a Fortress of Solitude out there. He will whip those Nazi's around like he did in the 1940's.
So a glass of water with ice cubes in it weighs more then a glass of water without ice?
Hmm.. do you know where I could get a scale precise enough to measure this effect on small scale so I can compare it with a larger glass of water called an Ocean?