I second that. Besides, it's a lot better to run tintin++ since you can have multiple sessions, sooner or later you're going to run out of ttys to have every damn telnet on...;)
I must disagree here. ZMud has about the slowest script engine I've seen to this day. It would indeed be a lot better to pay for MUSHClient instead, at least it's very lightweight memory and processor wise. You can run it without problem on a 486, and it's still fast. Try the same thing with ZMud and you're in for a surprise. Why settle for poorly programmed software when you can get something that somebody spent a lot of time and effort developing? Besides, isn't it fun to script in PerlScript or VBScript just because you can?
Slashdot Mirror
I second that. Besides, it's a lot better to run tintin++ since you can have multiple sessions, sooner or later you're going to run out of ttys to have every damn telnet on... ;)
I must disagree here. ZMud has about the slowest script engine I've seen to this day. It would indeed be a lot better to pay for MUSHClient instead, at least it's very lightweight memory and processor wise. You can run it without problem on a 486, and it's still fast. Try the same thing with ZMud and you're in for a surprise. Why settle for poorly programmed software when you can get something that somebody spent a lot of time and effort developing? Besides, isn't it fun to script in PerlScript or VBScript just because you can?